cppzmq | Header-only C++ binding for libzmq | Natural Language Processing library
kandi X-RAY | cppzmq Summary
kandi X-RAY | cppzmq Summary
cppzmq is a C binding for libzmq. It has the following design goals: - cppzmq maps the libzmq C API to C concepts. In particular: - it is type-safe (the libzmq C API exposes various class-like concepts as void*) - it provides exception-based error handling (the libzmq C API provides errno-based error handling) - it provides RAII-style classes that automate resource management (the libzmq C API requires the user to take care to free resources explicitly) - cppzmq is a light-weight, header-only binding. You only need to include the header file zmq.hpp (and maybe zmq_addon.hpp) to use it. - zmq.hpp is meant to contain direct mappings of the abstractions provided by the libzmq C API, while zmq_addon.hpp provides additional higher-level abstractions. There are other C bindings for ZeroMQ with different design goals. In particular, none of the following bindings are header-only: - [zmqpp] is a high-level binding to libzmq. - [czmqpp] is a binding based on the high-level czmq API. - [fbzmq] is a binding that integrates with Apache Thrift and provides higher-level abstractions in addition. It requires C14.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of cppzmq
cppzmq Key Features
cppzmq Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on cppzmq
QUESTION
I want to make a builder project that checks out sub-modules and builds them as a group, and I would like to build them in a single pass.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-09 at 00:17find_package() doesn't actually look at the global targets list, it has its own targets list that only prevents other find calls from refetching
instead of creating an alias target call find_package_handle_standard_args in a Find<>.cmake module for each class
so for this case a Findcppzmq.cmake
QUESTION
I am currently struggling to find the python headers on my system and can't include them therefore into a C++ application
this is my cmake file -->
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-24 at 09:32It seems to me that the first problem is with the order of these lines:
QUESTION
I have come to the stackoverflow gurus for a better understanding and possibly a better solution to what is going on. So I'm typically pretty good with Makefiles but there is a critical piece that I am missing with my Makefile. So I typically have a one Makefile fits all for my projects and it works pretty well. Or it did until I found out that I wasn't linking the libraries properly. Since I discovered that my Makefile has been incorrect and I have been having trouble figuring out a way to solve this / have a better solution.
What I want to do
Let's say I have some .cpp files (ignore the awful naming)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-05 at 03:05Your Makefile defines:
QUESTION
I've got some existing code that uses template class poller_t
from cppzmq. It's actually instantiated with t
being int
, not that it matters.
In libzmq, there is a method zmq_poller_add_fd(void *, int, void *, short)
that would allow me to wait on a regular file descriptor as well as the zmq::socket_t objects that are already being used.
I need to add a regular file descriptor to the wait_all
of the poller_t object, but unfortunately, I can't see an equivalent feature (equivalent to zmq_poller_add_fd
) in cppzmq.
What approaches have people used to get around this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-10 at 07:21The answer is that it can't be done using cppzmq facilities, but you can write your own implementation of the poller_t class, because it's FOSS, and just extend it with the additional features that you need. It works a charm.
The starting point is to copy your version of the implementation of the poller_t
template class into a new header file, and then just add the following in the appropriate locations. You may need to make slight modifications to suit, depending on how the cppzmq library evolves. Use using
declarations to bring the necessary types into your namespace.
QUESTION
I've been trying to find out how to stream images with zeromq (i'm using the cppzmq wrapper, but raw API answers are fine). Naively, I set up
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 16:40Use zmq_msg_init_data
http://api.zeromq.org/master:zmq-msg-init-data
You can provide the memory pointer/size of your already allocated memory and zeromq will take ownership (skipping the extra allocation). Once its been processed and is no longer needed it will call the associated free function where your own code can clean up.
I have used this approach in the past with a memory pool/ circular buffer and it worked well.
QUESTION
I'm building a yocto project which uses cppzmq
(http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/123508/)
The strange thing is that when I build it directly
bitbake cppzmq
it builds successfully.
But when I include it in my image
IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " cppzmq"
there is an error:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-09 at 08:43It is important to distinguish between the recipe name cppzmq
and the provided packages of the recipe. A single recipe can provide several packages (,
-dev
, -staticdev
etc.).
With IMAGE_INSTALL
you define which packages are included in the image.
Looking at the cppzmq recipe you can see that it only provides PACKAGES = "${PN}-dev"
.
Hence you should use IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " cppzmq-dev"
QUESTION
I've put together this minimal example in order to send a message from a Router socket to a specific DEALER socker (That has it's identity set). When running these two programs it appears to hang on the ROUTER waiting from the reply from the DEALER, and the DEALER hangs waiting for the request from the ROUTER. So it appears that the message that the ROUTER is sending is never making it to the DEALER.
Router.cpp
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-24 at 23:35The main idea about ROUTER/DEALER pattern is that it is an asynchronous generalisation of REPLY/REQUEST. Yet you are trying to reverse the sockets in your pattern, discovering it doesn't fit and contorting the code to try and make it fit. Don't do that.
What you need to do is "go with the flow". In the simple method, for which examples exist, the DEALER should send the first message. The ROUTER then responds to that.
The next level is for the DEALER to identify itself in its startup message. The ROUTER can then give a specific response to that DEALER.
At the next level you can go truly asynchronous. The ROUTER can take a copy of each DEALER's identification message, and use the message copies to send asynchronous messages to any DEALER at any time. One copy of the identification message would have the "PEER2" frame appended to it and sent to the DEALER. This works because the copies of the messages include the routing frames. Ideally, you would also strip the 'message' frames, to leave only the routing frames in the copy.
Caveat - I don't use cppzmq, I use CZMQ. I can say that using CZMQ this sort of frame manipulation is very easy.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install cppzmq
Build [libzmq](https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq) via cmake. This does an out of source build and installs the build files download and unzip the lib, cd to directory mkdir build cd build cmake .. sudo make -j4 install
Build cppzmq via cmake. This does an out of source build and installs the build files download and unzip the lib, cd to directory mkdir build cd build cmake .. sudo make -j4 install
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page