concoct | 🧪 An imperative, dynamically-typed, interpreted, general-purpose programming language | Interpreter library

The Remove-Item cmdlet expects to bind its property "Path" by either PropertyName or Value. This means that the object you pass in must either be an object that has a Path property or a string that is the full path to the file.

You'll want to replace the property 'Name' with 'FullName'

Here is the help for the Path parameter on Remove-Item

You can type cast the T.self as MetadataProvidingCodable.Type like that:

I would suggest the following steps so that you can avoid dynamic column selection altogether.

1. Convert the wide table (reference date as columns) to a long table (reference date as rows)
2. Compute the difference in months between time of the call TIME and reference date
3. Select only those with difference >= 0 and difference < 3
4. Format the output table (add a running number, pivot it) according to your requirements

Try assign the index back

I think this is what you want:

Are you sure that you get a stack overflow with the first version? How are you calling it? A call like factorial(5, Result) should fail, i.e., result in an answer like false or no.

Prolog doesn't "evaluate expressions" like other programming languages. A term like N - 1 is just data: A term with the functor - and two arguments N and 1. Even if N is bound to some number, say 5, the term is still just 5 - 1 and not 4. It is only mapped to 4 if you specifically ask the is predicate or one of the arithmetic comparison predicates (>, =<, =:=, etc.) to evaluate it.

So if you call your first factorial predicate as factorial(5, Result), the following things happen:

• the goal factorial(5, Result) does not unify with factorial(0, 1), this clause is skipped
• the goal factorial(5, Result) unifies with factorial(N, Result) with unifier N = 5, the body of this clause is executed with this binding
  • the goal 5 > 0 succeeds
  • the call factorial(5 - 1, Interim) is executed:
    • the goal factorial(5 - 1, Interim) does not unify with factorial(0, 1), this clause is skipped
    • the goal factorial(5 - 1, Interim) unifies with factorial(N, Result) with unifier N = 5 - 1 and Interim = Result, the body of this clause is executed with this binding
      • the goal 5 - 1 > 0 succeeds
      • the call factorial((5 - 1) - 1, Interim) is executed:
        • ...

This ends up calling factorial with ever larger terms 5, 5 - 1, (5 - 1) - 1, ((5 - 1) - 1) - 1, and so on. Since none of these terms ever unifies with 0, the computation can never succeed. Since each of these terms unifies with a fresh copy of N, the second clause always matches, but eventually you reach a term containing enough - 1 steps so that the goal N > 0 will fail, and the query factorial(5, Result) will fail.

Assuming you do not want accessors for "slot_1" and "slot_2", and if I understand the question correctly, this would be my implementation. I wouldn't call it a Test class, as that would interfere with the Test class that is used for testing.

Alright, I think we are able to achieve this if we re-order the analyzer a bit based on my current understanding. If we postpone generating the Edge Ngrams until after tokenization, we can ensure that we are only tokenizing terms that we are interested in auto-completing.

Columbia SC will transform into: ["Columbia", "South", "Carolina"] (before edge-ngramming). SC will never make it into the inverted index, only the fully qualified terms, even though SC is still searchable.

Here is your updated analyzer:

You could do this via aws ec2 but why not just use Trusted Advisor which already checks for bad security groups.

You can also access its checks via the CLI using the describe-trusted-advisor-check-summaries command.

These checks are free for all accounts.