VersaTile | simple 3D model editor based on simple quads | 3D Printing library

Well I have continued using nopython=False, and it seems that this causes a bit more compilations. Its not very scientific analysis, but it seems that my function is sometimes recompiled when I change various parameters, whereas with nopython=True it never got recompiled once it was compiled. So that seems to be a potential difference

The problem is with this line

First of all, the join index that the paper speaks of, can best be imagined as a table that implements a many-to-many relationship between two tables. A record in this join index table consists of two foreign keys: one referencing the primary key in the R table, and another referencing the primary key in the S table.

I didn't get the S.C notation used in the cheat sheet. But it is clear you'll somehow need to specify which join index to use, and more specifically, which B+Tree (clustering) you want to use on it (in case two of them are defined), and finally, which value (r.c, the key of r) you want to find in it.

The role of the B+tree is to provide an ordered hash table, i.e. where you can search a key efficiently, and can easily walk from that point to the subsequent entries in order. In this particular use for a join index, this allows you to efficiently find all pairs (r₁, s) for a given r₁. The first of those would be found by drilling down from the root of the B+tree to the first leaf having r₁. Then a walk forward across the bottom layer of the B+tree would find all the other tuples with r₁, until a tuple is encountered that no longer has this r₁ value.

Note that you still need an index on the original tables as well, in order to find the complete record for a given key. In practice that could also be done with a B+Tree, but in JavaScript, a simple dictionary (plain object) would suffice.

So in JavaScript syntax we could imagine something like this:

The following regex can capture the Code[...] value of areas not having 'TableRelation'.

No matter what code you put on the frontend, if an endpoint is visible to the client (for example, if it exists in the source code), it'll be possible for any client to send any information they want to that endpoint. Setting up client-side JavaScript validation is useful to improve the UI, but it doesn't improve the security of what's allowed to be submitted at all.

A good rule of thumb is: nothing that runs on the client is really secure, because the client can run any JavaScript code they want (and perhaps with a bot).

If you want to stop certain messages, you'll have to put the logic that tests for the submission's validity on the back-end, not only on the front-end - then only insert into the database if the back-end test passes.

You can set the css directly

If I'm understanding the context right, the actual goal is to take a path that contains some uppercase characters in its last element, and create a version with the last element lowercased. For example, /SoMe/PaTh/FiLeNaMe would be converted to /SoMe/PaTh/filename. If that's the case, rather than using string substitution, use dirname and basename to split it into components, uppercase the last, then reassemble it:

You can use ggtext::geom_textbox() to display annotations, and turn off the actual box part. Note that you need to know your x-limits in advance to calculate the correct width of the box in normalised parental coordinates (npc units). In this case* if you want from 0 to 40 on a scale of 1-100, you need to calculate (40-0)/((100 - 1) * 1.1). The 1.1 is the default scale expansion factor (5% on both sides). Added some vertical lines to show that text is inside those bounds.

On Workaround To access the Storage account using the SAS Token you need to pass the Account Name along with the SAS Token and Blob Name if you trying to upload and You need give the permission for your SAS Token .

Microsoft recommends using Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) to authorize requests against blob and queue data if possible, instead of Shared Key. Azure AD provides superior security and ease of use over Shared Key. For more information about authorizing access to data with Azure AD, see Authorize access to Azure blobs and queues using Azure Active Directory..

Note: Based on my testes you need to pass the Storage Account Name And SAS Token and the Container Name And Blob name

Example: I tried with uploading file to container using container level SAS Token . able to upload the file successfully.