cores | Teensy Core Libraries for Arduino

I answer as I know things on each part, possibly disregarding a few of your assertions:

I have four questions. Suppose in spark I have 3 worker nodes. Each worker node has 3 executors and each executor has 3 cores. Each executor has 5 gb memory. (Total 6 executors, 27 cores and 15gb memory). What will happen if: >>> I would use 1 Executor, 1 Core. That is the generally accepted paradigm afaik.

• I have 30 data partitions. Each partition is of size 6 gb. Optimally, the number of partitions must be equal to number of cores, since each core executes one partition/task (One task per partition). Now in this case, how will each executor-core will process the partition since partition size is greater than the available executor memory? Note: I'm not calling cache() or persist(), it's simply that I'm applying some narrow transformations like map() and filter() on my rdd. >>> The number of partitions being the same of number of cores is not true. You can service 1000 partitions with 10 cores, processing one at a time. What if you have 100K partition and on-prem? Unlikely you will get 100K Executors. >>> Moving on and leaving Driver-side collect issues to one side: You may not have enough memory for a given operation on an Executor; Spark can spill to files to disk at the expense of speed of processing. However, the partition size should not exceed a maximum size, was beefed up some time ago. Using multi-core Executors failure can occur, i.e. OOM's, also a result of GC-issues, a difficult topic.

• Will spark automatically try to store the partitions on disk? (I'm not calling cache() or persist() but merely just transformations are happening after an action is called) >>> Not if it can avoid it, but when memory is tight, eviction / spilling to disk can and will occur, and in some cases re-computation from source or last checkpoint will occur.

• Since I have partitions (30) greater than the number of available cores (27) so at max, my cluster can process 27 partitions, what will happen to the remaining 3 partitions? Will they wait for the occupied cores to get freed? >>> They will be serviced by a free Executor at a point in time.

• If I'm calling persist() whose storage level is set to MEMORY_AND_DISK, then if partition size is greater than memory, it will spill data to the disk? On which disk this data will be stored? The worker node's external HDD? >>> Yes, and it will be spilled to the local file system. I think you can configure for HDFS via a setting, but local disks are faster.

This an insightful blog: https://medium.com/swlh/spark-oom-error-closeup-462c7a01709d

This is not necessarily the best way to do it, but the shortest in writitng time. I don't know if you are familiar with python generators, but we will have to use one. the generator will work as a work dispatcher.

You need to add scala-compiler configuration to your pom.xml. The problem is without that there is nothing to compile your SparkTrans.scala file into java classes.

Add:

You can make the entire class inherit torch.nn.Module like so:

• executor is a jvm process when you use local[*] you run Spark locally with as many worker threads as logical cores on your machine so : 1 executor and as many worker threads as logical cores. when you configure SPARK_WORKER_INSTANCES=5 in spark-env.sh and execute these commands start-master.sh and start-slave.sh spark://local:7077 to bring up a standalone spark cluster in your local machine you have one master and 5 workers, if you want to send your application to this cluster you must configure application like SparkSession.builder().appName("app").master("spark://localhost:7077") in this case you can't specify [*] or [2] for example. but when you specify master to be local[*] a jvm process is created and master and all workers will be in that jvm process and after your application finished that jvm instance will be destroyed. local[*] and spark://localhost:7077 are two separate things.
• workers do their job using tasks and each task actually is a thread i.e. task = thread. workers have memory and they assign a memory partition to each task in order to they do their job such as reading a part of a dataset into its own memory partition or do a transformation on read data. when a task such as join needs other partitions, shuffle occurs regardless weather the job is ran in cluster or local. if you were in cluster there is a possibility that two tasks were in different machines so Network transmission will be added to other stuffs such as writing the result and then reading by another task. in local if task B needs the data in the partition of the task A, task A should write it down and then task B will read it to do its job

Short answer is yes since internally GetServices* extension methods resolves IEnumerable same as in constructors that have IEnumerable as injected dependency

Your problem is that uwsgi is not being run from inside the vent. To do so run the application with:

I think the Snakefile is ok, SRR3350597_GSM2112330_RA_hip_3_Homo_sapiens_RNA-Seq_1.fastq.gz is simply missing. See the ls output of yours, that file is not in it.

The problem is that you are passing tuples with floats into the function's parameters as the points. Here is the error reproduced: