swipl-devel | SWI-Prolog Main development repository
kandi X-RAY | swipl-devel Summary
kandi X-RAY | swipl-devel Summary
Main development repository
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of swipl-devel
swipl-devel Key Features
swipl-devel Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on swipl-devel
QUESTION
I reinstalled my OS and thus re-installed SWI-Prolog.
Here are the exact commands I ran for the installation.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-28 at 12:10Did you install packages gmp
and gmp-devel
before running cmake?
The command to install it is probably (using zypper
):
QUESTION
I am following the installation instructions from SWI-Prolog's site. I am on a Linux machine.
First I git-clone the repo and cd into swipl-devel.
Next I run the commands:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-31 at 18:08There is something really going wrong.
I have never had the swipl:xsb/nonmt_tests
tests failing (whatever they are).
Is the shell variable install_under
properly set when you run the above?
For example, I always install under a directory like /usr/local/logic/swipl
, so here you would have to say
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/logic/swipl
or
export install_under=/usr/local/logic/
in your case (not sure whether the export is needed, it sets an environment variable).
QUESTION
We try this in SWI Prolog (to be precise: SWI-Prolog (threaded, 64 bits, version 8.1.19-37-gc4fb81227)
)
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-22 at 14:52I went through SWI Environment Control (Prolog flags). Good candidates are 'unknown' and 'report_error'. I was not able to get them to work. Try your luck. Otherwise, your only option is catch.
QUESTION
This question starts from Mat's answer to Algorithm improvement for enumerating binary trees which has only one input value that determines the number of all nodes for the binary tree, and the need to be able to have two input values with one being the number of unary nodes and the other being the number of binary nodes.
While I was able to derive a solution by using listing/1 and threading extra state variables:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-14 at 12:47Basic tree expression parser with counters
Assuming a compound term representation for binary-unary trees (e.g., b(t,u(b(t,t,)))
), here is a basic parser. CLP(FD) is generally recommended for reasoning over integers.
QUESTION
I am currently taking a look at the SWI Prolog git repository (cloned to my local machine).
For this, I display the commit graph using
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-May-21 at 18:12Commits in Git are connected one-way; a commit knows what its parents are and that's it. When git log
or gitk
display a graph, they have to start reading the graph at a certain point, a branch or tag or commit. And then they can only see the ancestors of that tag. By default, both gitk
and git log
work this way and start with your current commit.
But you used git log --all
. This will start at every branch head and tag and display everything reachable. It'll show you every branch and every tag and all their ancestor commits.
gitk
, in contrast, will work from the current commit backwards. You'll only see ancestors of the current commit. v7.4.1
is not an ancestor of the current commit, so it doesn't even know about it.
Compare apples to apples: gitk --all
with git log --all
and gitk
with git log
.
There is a branch that ends with the tag "V7.4.1" (red circle around commit df973c8). This branch has become stale as no further work has been done on it. Is this right?
This isn't a branch, it's a tag. Both branches and tags are just labels which point at a commit, but tags are not supposed to move. Tags are intended to mark a single commit, in this case the release of v7.4.1, so they will always be "stale". Don't delete them, they're there so you can find important commits.
The same branch was fed from the master branch a bit earlier (blue circle around commit 675a4049 coming after 2f745e6). I don't understand the back-and-forth diagonal lines at that point though. Why do they "overshoot"?
Branches in Git are literally branches. What you're seeing is Git drawing those branches. But it can't always fit it neatly on the screen, so sometimes they cross. It's like looking down on a highway overpass.
675a4049 is where 2f745e6 and something else further down merged.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install swipl-devel
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page