Backstab | A tool to kill antimalware protected processes

 by   Yaxser C Version: v1.0.1-beta License: No License

kandi X-RAY | Backstab Summary

kandi X-RAY | Backstab Summary

Backstab is a C library. Backstab has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

Have these local admin credentials but the EDR is standing in the way? Unhooking or direct syscalls are not working against the EDR? Well, why not just kill it? Backstab is a tool capable of killing antimalware protected processes by leveraging sysinternals’ Process Explorer (ProcExp) driver, which is signed by Microsoft. ProcExp has a signed kernel driver that it loads on startup, which allows it to kill handles that cannot be killed even as an administrator. When you use the UI, you cannot kill a protected process, but you can kill it handles because ProcExp UI instructs the kernel driver to kill those handles. Backstab does the same thing but without the UI element. Here is a quick rundown of what happens. While the tool purpose is listing and killing handles, the opportunities are vast. It is possible to duplicate the handles to your own process instead of killing them. This could allow for deeper tampering where you write to files, fire events, hold mutexes. To support further research, I tried to make the code readable and split it to many methods to facilitate reuse, I also left a description on all ProcExp related methods. Feel free to reach out to me on Twitter or by Email.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              Backstab has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 1145 star(s) with 200 fork(s). There are 24 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 3 open issues and 5 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 1 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of Backstab is v1.0.1-beta

            kandi-Quality Quality

              Backstab has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              Backstab has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              Backstab code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              Backstab does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              Backstab releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Backstab
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            Backstab Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for Backstab.

            Backstab Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for Backstab.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Variable being processed before end of forEach
            Asked 2020-Oct-06 at 10:36

            Good day, Not gonna beat around the bush, I think my issue is simple. I have a function to get the total cost of a transaction. There's a forEach (for each item the user wants to buy). Here is what I have right now:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Aug-08 at 12:05

            forEach is not promise-aware. It cannot support async and await. You cannot use await in forEach.

            To wait the result we should return back to old-school “for loop”, but this time you can use modern version with for..of construction (thanks to Iteration Protocol) for better readability:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63315025

            QUESTION

            Normalize Vectors Before Performing Dot Product?
            Asked 2020-Sep-13 at 04:36

            I have a classic exercise which asks me to check if a character was attacked from the back (backstab or projectile). I know I can use the dot product for this, I was just wondering if I had to normalize the vectors first or if it didn't matter.

            My reasoning was if the vector coordinates were huge numbers, if it would cause my dot product to overflow or underflow.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Sep-13 at 00:38

            You are right that in principle, some coordinates could be so large that the dot product computation overflows.

            However, the representable range of finite 32-bit floats is enormous, with a maximum of roughly 3 × 10^38 (Wikipedia). For instance supposing your vectors are in units of centimeters, that's enough to compute dot products of vectors stretching from Pluto to the Sun (distance of about 6 × 10^14 cm) and still not get close to overflowing. By the "You aren't gonna need it" (YAGNI) principle, it is not worth writing the routine to handle inputs larger than that, unless it is specifically known that some inputs actually have interstellar magnitudes. Also, normalizing adds runtime cost, so I'd say it is preferable to not do it unless practically necessary.

            Broadly, just about any software that does arithmetic on floats or ints could have overflows in extreme cases. It would be a heavy burden if overflow error handling had to be considered around every operation. Instead, it is typical that software is developed considering inputs to stay within some reasonable range, without formally proving what the supported range is or handling out-of-range inputs, unless the application requires it.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63865318

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install Backstab

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/Yaxser/Backstab.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone Yaxser/Backstab

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:Yaxser/Backstab.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link