sysbench | Scriptable database and system performance benchmark
kandi X-RAY | sysbench Summary
kandi X-RAY | sysbench Summary
sysbench is a scriptable multi-threaded benchmark tool based on LuaJIT. It is most frequently used for database benchmarks, but can also be used to create arbitrarily complex workloads that do not involve a database server.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of sysbench
sysbench Key Features
sysbench Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on sysbench
QUESTION
I want the following code, which is related to the Sysbench tool (https://github.com/akopytov/sysbench), to change from the following code to the next code, but I get an error with just this small change (Segmentation fault (core dumped)).
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-18 at 17:07In order to emulate argv
from main
the strings pointed to by argv[n]
to must be writable, which is not the case in your code where argv[n]
point to string literals which cannot be written to.
Writing into a string literal is formally undefined behaviour in C, but on modern desktop platforms it typically triggers a seg fault.
And *tmp = '\0';
is actually writing into a string.
This should do the job, although I'm not entirely sure because I can't check it here easily.
QUESTION
I have this Dockerfile:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-11 at 18:23There is a reported bug about sysbench on aarch, ( which is the target arm processor that rpi uses). Try to follow the suggestion in: https://github.com/akopytov/sysbench/issues/298
QUESTION
I'm trying to make a job that runs sysbench on a pod. First I make the job with the next yaml:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-05 at 21:32You're trying to run a linux/amd64 image on an ARM-based system: essentially, the error is saying that doesn't understand how to run instructions since binary and processor are speaking different languages.
You have to find a compatible Docker image for your architecture.
QUESTION
- I want to test the performance of my NDB cluster.
- I am thinking of using sysbench.
- Are there any particular configuration changes required to make it work with the NDB cluster?
- Is there any flag that I need to use during runtime to mention the Storage engine explicitly.
Need some help on this.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-09 at 11:58I have a set of scripts that I use to automate benchmarking with NDB Cluster. They are available from the MySQL website and contains both the scripts to automate Sysbench execution and a sysbench version integrated with those scripts.
This blog provides a manual into how to use those scripts. http://mikaelronstrom.blogspot.com/2018/08/manual-for-benchmark-toolset-dbt2.html
The script run_oltp.sh contains the setup of the execution of the sysbench program if you want to use sysbench on your own.
QUESTION
When I use sysbench to test mysql, I use iotop
to monitor io and I find only have DiSH WRITE
speed, the DISK READ
speed is always 0. Then I use free -h
and I find that buffer/cache increase, does it mean that sysbench's test data is not write in disk but in buffer and no auto update into disk?
Thank you so much!
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-01 at 05:46where is the mysql running ?? I dont know about iotop and what its measuring but even tiny sysbench runs generate enormous IO. it could be a user issue maybe, perhaps mysql is generating io under a different user and not getting picked up.
QUESTION
The following minimal benchmark rebuilds single-threaded code with -O3 -march=native
on each machine, multiplying matrices that are either square or highly non-square (one dimension = 2).
ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-19 at 09:13As suggested by Peter Cordes in his comment, it seems to boil down to memory throughput.
Results of mbw 1000
show it:
i5-6600
:
QUESTION
I'm benchmarking comparable (2vCPU, 2G RAM) server (Ubuntu 18.04) from DigitalOcean (DO) and AWS EC2 (t3a.small).
The disk benchmark (fio) goes inline with the results of https://dzone.com/articles/iops-benchmarking-disk-io-aws-vs-digitalocean
In summary:
DO --
READ: bw=218MiB/s (229MB/s), 218MiB/s-218MiB/s (229MB/s-229MB/s), io=3070MiB (3219MB), run=14060-14060msec
WRITE: bw=72.0MiB/s (76.5MB/s), 72.0MiB/s-72.0MiB/s (76.5MB/s-76.5MB/s), io=1026MiB (1076MB), run=14060-14060msec
EC2 --
READ: bw=9015KiB/s (9232kB/s), 9015KiB/s-9015KiB/s (9232kB/s-9232kB/s), io=3070MiB (3219MB), run=348703-348703msec
WRITE: bw=3013KiB/s (3085kB/s), 3013KiB/s-3013KiB/s (3085kB/s-3085kB/s), io=1026MiB (1076MB), run=348703-348703msec
which shows DO disk more than 10 times faster than the EBS of EC2
However, sysbench following https://severalnines.com/database-blog/how-benchmark-postgresql-performance-using-sysbench is showing DO slower than EC2 (using Postgres 11 default configuration, read-write test on oltp_legacy/oltp.lua )
DO --
transactions: 14704 (243.87 per sec.)
Latency (ms):
min: 9.06
avg: 261.77
max: 2114.04
95th percentile: 383.33
EC2 --
transactions: 20298 (336.91 per sec.)
Latency (ms):
min: 5.85
avg: 189.47
max: 961.27
95th percentile: 215.44
What could be the explanation?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-06 at 16:12Sequential bandwidth and latency / iops are independent parameters.
Some workloads (like DBs) depend on latency for lots of small IOs. Or throughput for lots of small IO operations, iops (IOs per second).
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install sysbench
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page