watts | Word Spotting and Recognition with Embedded Attributes | Speech library

As noted in comments, identifiers in SML (as in many other programming languages) cannot begin with digits.

Figured it out. There's a new (to me) Transform feature in IoT Central Data Export.

We used the following rule to transform the telemetry.

telemetry: .telemetry | map({ (.name|tostring): .value }) | add

Use a bipartite version of the configuration model:

• create vertex IDs for each of the two partitions
• replicate each vertex ID as many times as its degree
• shuffle the lists if IDs and match them up, creating a graph

The REGEXP_REPLACE function offers one convenient approach here:

You did not specify a top-level template in the configuration. When missing, it defaults to "%StdinReader% }{ %uname% * %theDate%". Which of these three items is still Updating...?

If it's StdinReader (which is most likely) and assuming you want data logged by XMonad to be displayed (i.e. not just the "external" items you have defined), check if the output of your XMonad instance is properly piped into xmobar. This may be either set in your .xsession (or similar) file, or from within XMonad using spawnPipe and hPutStrLn (from the XMonad.Util.Run module from the xmonad-contrib package).

For the latter, you would typically also import XMonad.Hooks.DynamicLog (also from the xmonad-contrib package) and for your logHook redefine the ppOutput field of your preferred pretty-printer (presumably xmobarPP) to direct its output to an instance of xmobar. Your xmonad.hs would then look something like this:

In the first snippet there is no reason to have a separate loop for ctr and sum. You can do it in one loop.

Your second snipped is ok. unpack is limited so this won't work for many thousand values.

You have to traverse the table anyway to get the other values so you can determin min and max in that loop too without that size limit.

local value = line:match("%d%p%d") if there are only those numbers in that file you can skip the pattern matching here.

The calculations are pretty straigt forward. I'm not sure what you're struggling with here.

You have to pre processs the data with a function

you would write a sql query like this

IIUC, do you need?

You could use: