fanout | Kernel-based publish-subscribe system
kandi X-RAY | fanout Summary
kandi X-RAY | fanout Summary
Kernel-based publish-subscribe system
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of fanout
fanout Key Features
fanout Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on fanout
QUESTION
MessageListenerContainer
with MessageListenerAdapter
implemented as
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 14:21You are not allowed to manually bind anything to the default exchange.
See the management UI - there is no "bind" option.
Nor can you bind the default exchange to another.
You need to publish to the fanout and bind the reply queue to it.
QUESTION
I was recently hired as a junior dev as my first job for a bigger company which uses NetSuite. An old dev wrote a python script which handles pictures made by designers, that uploads pictures to NetSuite when they are uploaded to a specific folder.
Since the Script uses SHA1 I need to change the TBA to SHA256 because NetSuite does not support SHA1 anymore.
I have a hard time understanding the old dev's code, and find documentation on how to change the TBA from SHA1 to SHA256..
These are snippets from the code.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-20 at 16:25There is already sha256() function in Haslib file, so you can try to add a new class SignatureMethod_HMAC_SHA256 into the oauth file which can be similar to that SHA1.
Just change parameters of hmac.new() function like this:
QUESTION
I am implementing ApiGateway-MicroService communication protocol in my app with MassTransit and RabbitMQ. That protocol is meant to replace "traditional" REST API communication between ApiGateway and Microservices (I am talking about simple request-response here and not about any kind of events, sagas, etc). So on microservice(s) side I have consumers (which respond to requests) and on ApiGateway side I have request clients. Usually microservice has let's say ~10 consumers (for example OrderingMicroservice has consumers for following requests: CreateOrder, UpdateOrder, GetOrderById, ListUserOrders etc). I am trying to figure out best topology (Masstransit + RabbitMQ) for this scenario.
Here are my goals, at least I think it should work like this:
A. Request messages (that are routed to consumer queue) should be durable for short time only (for example 20s) and then removed from the consumer queue (and request client should receive timeout error) and not routed to any other queue. So when microservice is temporary down or it is temporary too busy to receive next request from queue then request messages should be kept in the queue for 20s and then disappear.
B. Since RequestClient should timeout after ~20s, Response messages (that are routed to client "response-queue") should also be durable for short amount of time (~20s). Then they can disappear. If ApiGW is offline / too busy to receive response then response(s) should be discarded.
So basically I want to use MassTransit/RabbitMQ as a short-lived buffer between ApiGW and microservice(s).
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-06 at 20:14All the work is done by MassTransit, as you can understand from the request documentation. You can change the default request timeout from 30 seconds to 20 seconds when adding the request client to the container. There is also an .AddGenericRequestClient()
method to automatically add requests clients for whatever request type is needed.
You can also specify the request timeout for each request, and it will set the message TimeToLive to match that value. The responses should be sent with a TimeToLive as needed.
QUESTION
I have two services, one acts as a consumer, the other as a producer. Following are my configurations for each of them.
Producer config
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-25 at 14:48You should remove the explicit receive endpoint configuration, and call ConfigureEndpoints
. This will create the endpoint for the saga.
QUESTION
I have one queue-publisher and one hundred queue-subscribers. Subscribers bind to one queue. The Rabbit`s guide said that to each queue Rabbit creates single thread. I want to send all messages to subscribers through one queue and save all unsended messages in the same queue if destination subscriber is offline. I have two solutions:
- I can send all messages through one queue to all subscribers by declaring exchange type "Direct" and bind to one QueueName. But if routingKey in publishing message not equals queue name, it doesnt save in queue, if direct consumer is offline.
suscriber`s code
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-24 at 10:25Have you considered maybe a DB for users that are not online..
Queue => consumer is offline => send to DB Consumer is online => Publisher checks db for any messages that might have been missed => then directs them to Consumber
QUESTION
I am implementing application in microservices architecture. I would like to attach some kind of event store to my solution. I am new to messaging with RabbitMQ, and probably i've configured something improperly. Let's simplify my solution, so imagine i have a simple common service which has to broadcast some messages to the bus. To register broker dependencies i use the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-04 at 13:02You aren't using AddMassTransit
properly. You also don't start the bus on the consumer side.
It's all properly documented, you just need to copy-paste the example.
QUESTION
I am struggling with typeScript syntax used in the snippet below. Can someone kindly clear it out for me.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-26 at 16:21If you're looking for readability, perhaps async/await is better than .then()
?
QUESTION
I have a queue in RabbitMQ. I can't configurate this queue, I have to consume messages from it. Publisher don't use Masstransit for publishing. I am using Masstransit to consume messages from the queue.
When I am trying to configurate connection to the queue, I am receiving this error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-16 at 18:25The issue is the my_queue
exchange already exists with a direct exchange type. By default, MassTransit will create this exchange as a fanout exchange. Direct exchanges are used for routing messages via routing key. For an example of using direct exchanges with MassTransit, check out the direct sample.
You can see the broker topology configured by MassTransit for RabbitMQ.
QUESTION
I have gone through the fundamentals of RabbitMQ. One thing I figured out that a publisher does not directly publish on a queue. The exchange decides on which queue the message should be published based on routing-key
and type of exchange (code below is using default exchange). I have also found an example code of publisher.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-25 at 11:31The consumer can declare the queue and bind it to the exchange when the consumer connects to RabbitMQ. A fanout exchange then copies and routes a received message to all queues bound to it, regardless of routing keys or pattern matching as with direct and topic exchanges.
So no, the publisher does not have to be aware of all queues bound to the exchange. However, the publisher can ensure that the queue exists to ensure that the code will run smoothly, but that is of more importance for other exchange types.
QUESTION
I am new to AWS/Database.
Since i am completely beginner to this, any suggestions will be appreciated.
Currently in the project it has been planned like data from AWS database will be pushed using SNS HTTP fanout to external MySql Database.
NOTE :
1.The data will be pushed by the Client using AWS SNS
2. We have no access to the AWS account nor we are planning to have a AWS account.
3. External MySql database is a private database running on Linux Server
I have gone through the Official documentation of AWS SNS, and also some websites. This is all i found :
Use external applications like Zapier to map the data.
Develop some application to map the data.
Is it like using a Servlet application in the receiver side to update the table, or is there any other methods?
AWS DB -----> SNS -----> _________ -----> External MySql DB
Thanks
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-24 at 04:08Probably, option two would be more suited, or at least first to be considered. For that option you would have have to develop a lambda function which would receive data from SNS, re-format if needed and upload it to MySQL. So your architecture would look like:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install fanout
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page