fractals | Julia and Mandelbrot Fractal Generator

I was making some exercise to train myself and the exercise asked me to do a program that calculates fractals, very simple, i've done in about 1-2 minutes and it work, but looking at his solution it return x multiplicated by the function itself? how does this run? I know maybe it's a stupid question but i think it might be useful.

I am doing a very simple test using the Williams Fractal indicator that I copied directly from the standard one in Tradingview "as is".

I am trying to enter the trade when downFractal is true, exit it when upFractal is true.

The results of the strategy are completely inconsistent with what they should be as for the plotting and, for the love of me, I honestly cannot understand why. Maybe I am not using boolean variables right?

I am attempting to spot a pattern of conditions (Williams Fractals, in this case).

According to rumpypumpydumpy's helpful answer/explanation here, I can use the valuewhen() function with the bar_index variable as the source, giving me the position of the occurrence!

However I must be misapplying this technique, because I can't get a shape to plot.

What I'm looking for is an alternating Fractals pattern (up/down/up); here is my current code snippet:

This is the code for generating the fractals.

I am writing code to visualize Mandelbrot sets and other fractals. Below is a snippet of the code that is being run. The code runs perfectly fine as is, but I am trying to optimize it to make higher resolution images faster. I've tried using caching on fractal(), along with @jit and @njit from Numba. Caching resulted in a crash (from memory overflow I'm assuming) and @jit just slows down the execution of my program by a factor of 6. I am also aware of the many mathematical ways there are of making my code run faster, as I've seen on the Wikipedia page, but I would like to see if I can get one of the above methods or some alternative to work.

For creating multiple images in a row (to make a zoom animation, like this one) I've implemented multiprocessing (which seems to run 9 processes at once) but I don't know how to implement the same in the creation of a single high resolution image.

Here is my code snippet:

I'm trying to create Stochastic Divergences and I don't really like the available open source scripts. The question is how do I obtain the highs and lows below 30 and above 70 lower and upper limits only? That way I could compare them to their price above and there we go with the divergences. I'm not really interested in what's between those limits because it's inaccurate. Most of the scripts are using fractals, but I want specifically the outer highs/lows. Could you please share your experience on how to find those?

I wrote this little snippet of code in Processing, that draws rectangles via a loop… each rectangle is slighty wider as the code loops through the rows… So far so good… But what I actually would like to achieve is that in the first row is 1 rectangle, in the second row 2, in the third 3 and so on… in other words, that every row has as many rectangles in it as its row number… But I am really stuck here. I thought of a nested loop. With that I can draw in X and Y axis… but how to combine that with the with? Does this have something with fractals to do?

Here ist my little snippet:

I am trying to replicate "Frequency Synthesis of Landscapes" by P. Bourke in Python. I thought it would be a simple

I'm trying to modify some existing matlab code from 2 dimensions to 3 dimensions, and running in to a conceptual block. The original script generates fractals from 2d random noise by running an ifft(3) on the product of a power spectrum and random noise. In order to define the power spectrum I have to define the frequencies in U, V and W dimensions.

I'm having a mental block of what the W dimension frequencies should look like in relation to U and V. Obviously they wouldn't just be a transpose of U or V. Included a little extra code at the beginning and end if it helps clarify things. The var powerspectrum is currently returning a 2d matrix and it should be 3d. Thanks!