slurm | SLURM : A Highly Scalable Resource Manager
kandi X-RAY | slurm Summary
kandi X-RAY | slurm Summary
SLURM: A Highly Scalable Resource Manager
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of slurm
slurm Key Features
slurm Examples and Code Snippets
def _get_slurm_var(name):
"""Gets the SLURM variable from the environment.
Args:
name: Name of the step variable
Returns:
SLURM_ from os.environ
Raises:
RuntimeError if variable is not found
"""
name = 'SLURM_' + name
try:
def _get_num_slurm_tasks():
"""Returns the number of SLURM tasks of the current job step.
Returns:
The number of tasks as an int
"""
return int(_get_slurm_var('STEP_NUM_TASKS'))
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on slurm
QUESTION
I have the following problematic and I am not sure what is happening. I'll explain briefly.
I work on a cluster with several nodes which are managed via slurm. All these nodes share the same disk memory (I think it uses NFS4). My problem is that since this disk memory is shared by a lots of users, we have a limit a mount of disk memory per user.
I use slurm to launch python scripts that runs some code and saves the output to a csv file and a folder.
Since I need more memory than assigned, what I do is I mount a remote folder via sshfs from a machine where I have plenty of disk. Then, I configure the python script to write to that folder via an environment variable, named EXPERIMENT_PATH. The script example is the following:
Python script:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-31 at 07:00I shall emphasize that all the nodes in the cluster share the same disk space so I guess that the mounted folder is visible from all machines.
This is not how it works, unfortunately. Trying to put it simply; you could say that mount point inside mount points (here SSHFS inside NFS) are "stored" in memory and not in the "parent" filesystem (here NFS) so the compute nodes have no idea there is an SSHFS mount on the login node.
For your setup to work, you should create the SSHFS mount point inside your submission script (which can create a whole lot of new problems, for instance regarding authentication, etc.)
But before you dive into that, you probably should enquiry whether the cluster has another filesystem ("scratch", "work", etc.) where there you could temporarily store larger data than what the quota allows in your home filesystem.
QUESTION
I am currently trying to write a bash script which runs my executable with some input parameters. Most of the input parameters are set inside the script, some of them are passed to the bash script and evaluated. What I need now is to generalise the script so if I want to set other inputs known by my executable then I would want to write them in the bash script input. In other words my bash script executes at the end the command:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-22 at 08:27If I understand correctly, you have 7 parameters that you handle in the script and all the others should just be given to you executable?
Try this:
QUESTION
I'm relatively new to working with bash. I've inherited this bit of code to run a command via SLURM on an HPC system:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-18 at 19:06One way to get status is to save it in a file :
QUESTION
I am trying to run many smaller SLURM job steps within one big multi-node allocation, but am struggling with how the tasks of the job steps are assigned to the different nodes. In general I would like to keep the tasks of one job step as local as possible (same node, same socket) and only spill over to the next node when not all tasks can be placed on a single node.
The following example shows a case where I allocate 2 nodes with 4 tasks each and launch a job step asking for 4 tasks:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-09 at 08:46Unfortunately, there is no other way. You have to use -N
.
Even if you use -n 1
(instead of 4) there will be a warning:
QUESTION
I have a job script called testjob.sh
which I submit as
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-07 at 09:23sbatch
runs the job in a different environment ("in the background"), therefore you can't pipe stuff into the scripts.
You can avoid this in two ways:
- use
srun
instead ofsbatch
, which doesn't disconnect the job from your session and piping works more-or-less normally. Still, this doesn't allow you to "queue" the job as with batches. - use intermediate file for saving the input, i.e., modify the batch file to read the input from
testjob.in
:
QUESTION
When trying to create a bash script (.sh file) in Java, random characters are added to the beginning of the file.
As a result, the script is rejected by SLURM when submitted using the sbatch
command.
My Code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 00:22The problem is you used a DataOutputStream
. That is unnecessary here, just write to the FileOutputStream
. The 0x05 0x01 is an object header that is meaningful only when the output is read later by a DataInputStream
.
QUESTION
I need to submit a slurm job that needs to have a core count divisible by 7 on a cluster with 64 core nodes. One solution is to run a 7 node/16 core job, which works well because the parallelization works extremely well between these 7 groups of cores (very little communication between the 7 groups).
Scheduling of this job becomes difficult however since its hard for 7 nodes to open up 16 cores at one time. Are there any ways to submit jobs in the following configurations?
Explicitly request 2 nodes, one uses 64 cores and one uses 48 cores.
Allow the job to combine the 7 node job to place multiple node allocations on a single node, allowing it to simply find 7 groups of 16 cores.
The only thing I cannot allow is the groups of 16 cores to be split over 2 nodes, as this will dramatically hurt performance.
This is running on slurm 20.11.8
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-01 at 10:29Explicitly request 2 nodes, one uses 64 cores and one uses 48 cores.
If I understood your requirement correctly, then this will satisfy your first configuration requirement:
QUESTION
I am using slurm to submit jobs to the university supercomputer. My matlab function has one parameter:
function test(variable_1)
and my slurm file is (I am not sure if it is correct. I know how to define the value of the parameter in the slurm file, but I would like to pass the value to the slurm file as I need to run the matlab function many times with different values for the parameter):
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-28 at 07:16The first argument of the Bash script is stored in an environment variable named $1
. So the last line of the script should be
QUESTION
I have a SLURM job script as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-24 at 12:06Actually, the single quotes will be striped by Bash during the assignment.
QUESTION
When submitting jobs with sbatch
, is a copy of my executable taken to the compute node? Or does it just execute the file from /home/user/
? Sometimes when I am unorganised I will submit a job, then change the source and re-compile to submit another job. This does not seem like a good idea, especially if the job is still in the queue. At the same time it seems like it should be allowed, and it would be much safer if at the moment of calling sbatch
a copy of the source was made.
I ran some tests which confirmed (unsurprisingly) that once a job is running, recompiling the source code has no effect. But when the job is in the queue, I am not sure. It is difficult to test.
edit: man sbatch
does not seem to give much insight, other than to say that the job is submitted to the Slurm controller "immediately".
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 12:38The sbatch
command creates a copy of the submission script and a snapshot of the environment and saves it in the directory listed as the StateSaveLocation
configuration parameter. It can therefore be changed after submission without effect.
But that is not the case for the files used in the submission script. If your submission script starts an executable, if will see the "version" of the executable at the time it starts.
Modifying the program before it starts will lead to the new version being run, modifying it during the run (i.e. while it has already been read from disk and saved into memory) will lead to the old version being run.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install slurm
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page