newlib | Newlib for aarch64-darwin
kandi X-RAY | newlib Summary
kandi X-RAY | newlib Summary
This repository contains a Newlib port for bare metal AArch64 with Darwin ABI (aarch64-none-darwin). This is used as the standard library in PongoOS. Some patches had to be applied in order to make it compile with clang and under Darwin ABI. The current Newlib is based on version 4.1.0.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of newlib
newlib Key Features
newlib Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on newlib
QUESTION
I was trying setup enviorment to develop some program for new PICO, but only compile one time, after I haved this error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-22 at 13:50Okey, solution was erease the content from autogenerated file, save file and build again...,
After several builds error appear again, and same procedure was success :D
Thanks all that tried to helped me if knows about root issue will be great!
QUESTION
Update: Writing this out allowed me to spot where I was going wrong, but not why. I am obviously calling fgets in the wrong way, because after five calls I get to the address 0x221000 which is where the mmapped memory is - I am writing at higher addresses - but I don't know why that that is happening. Could someone explain?
This is a bit complex and I'm at a loss to see why this behaviour is seen: I don't know if I have got the basics wrong or if it's a feature of Spike/PK.
To note: the libc here is provided by newlib and the code is compiled as riscv64-unknown-elf.
Short version I have input code written in RISC-V assembly that previously ran smoothly, but since I introduced a system call to mmap it crashes the fifth time it is executed. Is the problem because I have got the wrong sequence of calls or possibly an issue with the Spike emulator and PK proxy kernel?
Long explanation
I am writing a Forth-like threaded interpreted language. It is currently targeted at the PK proxy kernel on the Spike emulator, but hopefully soon to run on 'real' hardware. The code is at https://github.com/mcmenaminadrian/riscyforth
The TIL implements an endless loop to pick up input calling, in sequence, a routine to get the filepointer for standard input and then a routine to get the input.
To get the standard input filepointer (which is stored on the stack):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-20 at 07:11By repeatedly opening the file my code was eating up more and more memory and eventually overwrote part of the memory range allocated via mmap. I solved this by storing the value of the file pointer in the .bss (inputfileptr) and only opening it once:
QUESTION
let me start by saying that this is my first time really meddling with GCC, so I apologize if this question is not very constructive or has been answered before.
I have two static libraries:
"L1.h"
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-17 at 22:25My first question is, does the order matter here?
Yes, literally from gcc documentation:
-l library
...
It makes a difference where in the command you write this option; the linker searches and processes libraries and object files in the order they are specified. Thus, ‘foo.o -lz bar.o’ searches library ‘z’ after file foo.o but before bar.o. If bar.o refers to functions in ‘z’, those functions may not be loaded.
how to tell the linker(?) that there is a strong definition of the function in another static library, or something along those lines?
Typically in modern embedded:
QUESTION
I would like to create a build of my embedded C code which specifically checks that floating point operations aren't introduced into it by accident. I've tried adding +nofp
to my [cortex-m3
] processor architecture but GCC for ARM doesn't like that (probably because the cortex-m3 doesn't have a floating point unit). I've tried specifying -mfpu=none
but that isn't a permitted option. I've tried leaving -lm
off the linker command-line but the linker seems too clever to be fooled by that and is compiling code with double
in it and resolving pow()
anyway.
This post: https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-help/2011-07/msg00093.html from 2011 hints that GCC has no such option, since no-one is interested in it, which surprises me as it seems like a common thing to want, at least from an embedded standpoint, to avoid accidental C-library bloat.
Does anyone know of a way to do this with GCC/newlib without me having to go through and manually hack stuff out of the C library file it chooses?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-02 at 19:22It is not just a library issue. Your target will use soft-fp, and the compiler will supply floating point code to implement arithmetic operators regardless of the library.
The solution I generally apply is to scan the map file for instances of the compiler supplied floating-point routines. If your code is "fp clean" there will be no such references. The math library and any other code that perform floating-point arithmetic operations will use these operator implementations, so you only need look for these operator calls and can ignore the Newlib math library functions.
The internal soft-fp routines are listed at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Soft-float-library-routines.html. It is probably feasible to manually check the mapfile for fp symbols but you might write yourself a script or tool to scan the map file for these names to check your. The cross-reference section of the map file will list all modules these symbols are used in so you can use that to identify where the floating point code is used.
The Newlib stdio functions support floating-point by default. If your formatted I/O is limited to printf()
you can use iprintf()
instead or you can rebuild Newlib with FLOATING_POINT
undefined to remove floating point support from all but scanf()
(no idea why). You can then use the map file technique again to find "banned" formatted I/O functions (although these are likely to also use the floating point operator functions in any case, so you will already have spotted them indirectly).
An alternative is to use an alternative stdio library to override the Newlib versions. There are any number of "tiny printf" implementations available you could use. If you link such a library as object code or list its library ahead of Newlib in the link command, it will override the Newlib versions.
QUESTION
I have a target (Stm32f030R8) I am using with FreeRTOS and the newlib reentrant heap implementation (http://www.nadler.com/embedded/newlibAndFreeRTOS.html). This shim defines sbrk in addition to implementing the actual FreeRTOS memory allocation shim. The project is built with GNU ARM GCC and using --specs=nosys.specs.
For the following example, FreeRTOS has not been started yet. malloc has not been called before. The mcu is fresh off boot and has only just copied initialized data from flash into ram and configured clocks and basic peripherals.
Simply having the lib in my project, I am seeing that sbrk is being called with very large increment values for seemingly small malloc calls.
The target has 8K of memory, of which I have 0x12b8 (~4KB bytes between the start of the heap and end of ram (top of the stack).
I am seeing that if I allocate 1000 bytes with str = (char*) malloc(1000);
, that sbrk gets called twice. First with an increment value of 0x07e8 and then again with an increment value of 0x0c60. the result being that the desired total increment count is 0x1448 (5192 bytes!) and of course this overflows not just the stack, but available ram.
What on earth is going on here? Why are these huge increment values being used by malloc for such a relatively small desired buffer allocation?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-30 at 11:37I think it may not possible to answer definitively, rather than just advise on debugging. The simplest solution is to step through the allocation code to determine where and why the allocation size request is being corrupted (as it appears to be). You will need to course to build the library from source or at least include mallocr.c in your code to override any static library implementation.
In Newlib Nano the call-stack to _sbrk_r
is rather simple (compared to regular Newlib). The increment is determined from the allocation size s
in nano_malloc()
in nano-mallocr.c as follows:
QUESTION
I want to get some output on a RISC-V program (assembly) running on top of pk on Spike using newlib.
I can call printf with null terminated strings eg (snippet)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-10 at 23:50You don't. You null terminate msg
I'm not quite familiar with this assembly, but you want to get it to emit a zero byte. One of these might be correct:
QUESTION
I am compiling newlib so I can continue the building of my cross-compiler, but newlib is getting confused with the 32-bit support I also included in my cross-compiler.
I already have my cross-compiler compiled and installed, but it's missing a standard library along with libgcc, so most programs will not compile, but programs not using standard functions will compile as long as the -nostdlib
argument is used
If you're asking to me: "You should use glibc instead!", I'll answer: It requires source files from Linux, but the Linux source code does not play well on Windows, because Windows thinks that some files are the same due to the case-insensitive file system.
The errors are:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-18 at 18:53I fixed it. I simply disabled multilib, because I can just simply build another compiler for 32-bit.
QUESTION
I wanted to use the cross-compiler for some testing on an or1200
design in which I used to perform some benchmarks on another machine. The other machine had the binaries of the or32-uclinux-
tool chain and I coppied those to my Ubuntu 20.04 machine.
The binaries seem to work fine, but when I tried to compile my assembly code with
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-12 at 13:01The cause for the errors is that gcc
is running the native assembler instead of the or1200 one. Turns out the executable binary of the assembler was on a big file system with 64 bit inodes and happened to get one which was outside of the 32 bit integer range. gcc uses the stat
C library function to locate the helper programs which in this case failed with EOVERFLOW
. Unfortunately, the system call succeeds so looking in strace
does not give a hint as to why the presence of the file is not detected:
QUESTION
i'm new in this type of coding and i'm trying to do some test executing bare-metal software for Cortex-A processors. I have experience with Cortex-M MCU and i compiled code with an IDE like ARM-Keil and with SDK by Nordic for some BLE jobs. Now i want to try to understand better the world of Cortex-A and i would learn coding in a bare-metal way, starting from some examples that i found online. I had some experiences with freeRTOS with Cortex-M, so i found online some git repository from some good guy that makes a porting of freeRTOS for RaspberryPI and BeableBoneBlack. From now on i will just explain my problem for the BeableBoneBlack, beacouse for the RaspberryPI it's similar.
I'm on linux, i installed gcc-arm-none-eabi compiler, so i cloned the BeagleBone Black with freeRTOS repository from this link.
I usually use VS Code to write code, so in the integrated terminal when i run the command make everything it's working and the of my BBB flashes correctly.
So now i would like to improve my code, and in order to do some tests i would like to use the rand()
function, from stdlib.h. Unhappily I find that there are some errors: undefined reference to rand
.
The last months, before doing tests with the BBB, i found other repos for RPi2 and i learn something about the linker of the arm-none-eabi compiler, that needs the addition of some parameters in order link library files during the process.
From this repo now i have two files: makedefs_ti and makefile. Opening the make file i found in line 26-27 the part of the generation of the file app, so where the linker is called. In this lines there are references to LIB_GCC
and LIB_C
, which are defined in the makedefs_ti. In lines 49-50 there are the references to the directory where the compiler is installed (I changed 4.7.3 with the correct one installed on my linux pc that is 9.2.1).
In the makefile, after -L$(LIB_C)
, if i add the linker parameters like -lc
or -lg
and try to recompile, i had error like arm-none-eabi-ld: cannot find -lc
.
With some understanding from online resources i modified the the makedefs_ti as following:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-06 at 05:05start.s
QUESTION
I am trying to write a simple "Hello, World!" firmware for Cortex-M0 CPU. The goal is to correctly initialize and shutdown C++ runtime so that global constructors are called before main() and global destructors are called after main(). So far I managed to get exactly half of it working - global ctors run correctly, but global destructors don't. I use gcc on Windows with the Newlib, which is supposed to initialize the runtime.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-21 at 23:20Ok, so for those who are interested, there are two ways for gcc to generate calls to global destructors. One way is via __cxa_atexit. The compiler will inject a piece of code into the global constructor, which uses __cxa_atexit to register the destructor of that object. This way, when exit is called, the runtime "knows" which destructors to invoke. This complexity is needed to deal with loading/unloading of shared libraries.
However, it is also possible to pass a -fno-cxa-atexit flag, and the compiler will put the calls to global destructors into .fini_array. The Newlib then uses this section to invoke the destructors. More can be found here: https://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=36728
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install newlib
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page