sam | An updated version of the sam text editor | Data Manipulation library

If you have string you could use Series.str.strip in order to remove ']' or '[' and then use Series.str.split to convert all rows to list ,after that we could use .str accesor

I've found some kind of a rationale in a comment in KT-7770:

... treating all the applicable interfaces as SAM might be too unexpected/implicit: one having a SAM-applicable interface may not assume that it will be used for SAM-conversions. Thus, adding another method to the interface becomes more painful since it might require changing syntax on the call sites (e.g. transforming callable reference to object literal).

Because of it, current vision is adding some kind of modifier for interfaces that when being applied:

• Adds a check that the interface is a valid SAM
• Allows SAM-conversions on call sites for it

Something like this:

You can change to old console, set lambda trigger, it's worked. Then you can change to new console again.

Edit :

If I understand correctly, you want to reproduce the deployment on the SAM app. If that's the case, there is an AWS sample that covers the same approach.

It seems you are using either CodeStar/CodeCommit/CodePipeline/CodeDeploy/Code... etc. from AWS to deploy your SAM application on example1.

At deploy time, these resources under infrastructure are created by the "Code" services family in order to authorize, instantiate, build, validate, store, and deploy your application to CloudFormation.

On the other hand, on example2, whenever you build your project in your local machine, both instantiation, build, validation, storage (of the upload-able built artifacts) are leveraged by your own device, hence not needed be provisioned by AWS.

To shortly answer your question: No. Your can't recreate these infrastructure resources on your own. But again, you wouldn't need to do so while deploying outside of AWS' code services.

Use:

You can define the functions inside the Delegator as extension function, this way the receiver is passed as this to the lambda.

The fields of a union all share the same starting memory address. This means that writing to one member will overwrite the contents of another.

When you write one member and then read a different member, the representation of the written member (i.e. how it is laid out in memory) is reinterpreted as the representation of the read member. Integers and floating point types have very different representations, so it makes sense that reading a float as though it were an int can vary greatly.

Things become even more complicated if the two types are not the same size. If a smaller field is written and a larger field is read, the excess bytes might not have event been initialized.

In your example, you first write the value 10 to the int member. Then you write the value 5.99 to the float member. Assuming int and float are both 4 bytes in length, all of the bytes used by the int member are overwritten by the float member.

When you then change the char member, this only changes the first byte. Assuming a float is represented in little-endian IEEE754, this changes just the low-order byte of the mantissa, so only the digits furthest to the right are affected.

With a Little Research, I found the below function which would remove the duplicates within the same cell.

Ok, I have solved the problem with a great help of this github thread False positive Error - TS6133 error (declared but its value is never read) report.

I have changed "noUnusedLocals" setting in the tsconfig.json file from the default true to false, so the file becomes: