glusterfs | Gluster Filesystem : Build your distributed storage in minutes | Storage library

params... as part of function-like macro is a GNU extension before C standardized ellipsis as part of arguments of function-like macros.

See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Variadic-Macros.html#Variadic-Macros

Nowadays, prefer __VA_ARGS__.

In C function declaration 'params, ...)' equal to 'params...)'?

No, they are not equal in function-like macros. The first one needs to use __VA_ARGS__ to reference variadic arguments and use __VA_OPT__ or ##__VA_ARGS__ to remove leading comma. In the params... then params is straight up replaced by all the arguments including commas.

Doing just ellipsis , ...) and using __VA_ARGS__ would be equal to , params...) and using params.

In normal functions params... as part of parameter-list is just invalid.

Real credit goes to DaveMaze in the comments... His note about service/systemctl and CMD lead me down a path that ended up working:

I eventually found out that you can mount GCS and then access blobs in it using: gcsfuse

For future references - there are equivalents in s3fs-fuse (which supports also GCS, minio, etc).

Sorry if I spammed.

In this case VM disk format is qcow2. Be default parameter GUESTFS_ADD_DRIVE_OPTS_FORMAT is "qcow", so using guestfish there arn't any errors. In C++ code you should set GUESTFS_ADD_DRIVE_OPTS_FORMAT in appropriate value.

The SCC you created currently applies to the User developer, and the group developer.

Your deployment uses a ServiceAccount runasanyuid.

You need to edit your SecurityContextConstraint, allowing that ServiceAccount:

Need to install userpace-rcu as Knud mentioned above, since I'm using Centos 7 with x86_64 architecture, I just need to install this package before installing glusterfs-server

yum install http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.9.2009/storage/x86_64/gluster-9/Packages/u/userspace-rcu-0.10.0-3.el7.x86_64.rpm

1.For stateful set services such as databases, StatefulSet controllers should be used to deploy;

2.The storage data resources should be of a shared type, rather than using local volumes as storage, which may be scheduled to other nodes when creating POD objects;

rsync does not seem to have anything specifically to handle this case, but what you can do is construct a list of files to exclude by using find beforehand. For example:

Is there a way I can skip this requirement checking in rspec?

The error reported in the RSpec test is a catalog compilation error. It is in no way specific to RSpec. Indeed, it is pointing to a bona fide weakness in zabbix::agent::userparam, and a resulting probable flaw in your class under test. This is precisely one of the reasons for writing RSpec tests!

The issue is that zabbix::agent::userparam does not stand independently. It requires Package['zabbix-agent'] to be declared, but it neither declares it itself nor declares a class that does. Your class under test inherits this weakness, though the farther you get from the the center of the issue, the more you have to lean toward calling it a bug, as opposed to simply a weakness. Your class, too, could declare the needed other class, and it probably should do.

You cannot cause the catalog builder to let a requirement on a non-existent resource pass unremarked, nor should you want to do, because this is among the kinds of things that you want your tests to reveal to you. But if you want to allow this weakness in your class to persist, then you can use an RSpec pre-condition to make RSpec declare the appropriate class for you, so that the requirement is actually satisfied.