MemDump | Dump android memory tool
kandi X-RAY | MemDump Summary
kandi X-RAY | MemDump Summary
Dump android memory tool
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of MemDump
MemDump Key Features
MemDump Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on MemDump
QUESTION
I wrote a very simple program , out of curiosity , to read the first 1000 bytes ahead and behind a single-element array , just to see what values I'd get, and what to make of them.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-10 at 12:31The printf()
-specifier %lld
expects a long long
as argument. If you provide a shorter variable, like you do, you only set a part of this argument and cause UB, in addition to the UB you cause with accessing an array out of bounds (yes i know UB is UB and there is not a different form of UB, but i want to explain why you get the values you get). On AMD64 the upper 32 bit of the value is probably the same as some random part of the program set the used register before and the char
argument only changes the lower 32 bit part. Every value outside of the range of an int
is because of this error.
The mem[i]
is a char, which is then promoted to an int
. Because of that you will normally not get a value in the range of int
but not in the range of char
this way.
If you want to make that experiment use the right format specifier and i would suggest you use a hexadecimal format specifier. Using a unsigned char
would also be smarter. It would still be UB, since it accesses memory out of bounds, but you will more likely print what is actually stored in the memory.
You can use negative values for the []
operator and this is well defined when you have a pointer that points in the middle or end of an array and the negative value is still inside the array. It is not in your case, since it is no longer inside the array but it still works. You can combine both loops to a single one.
QUESTION
I'm writing a memdump application in C and the goal is to print a real piece of the application memory of a specific address. The code I already have is this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Mar-07 at 17:41How about this:
QUESTION
I'm setting up a prototype for a DAQ system for Zynq FPGAs. I receive data from a server through ethernet, write it to a FIFO using the DMA and viceversa using two different pthreads. However, the send operation hangs, and after some iterations, it performs correctly then hangs again, meanwhile the recv
operations succeedes and fills the FIFO.
Sometimes the threads worked as expected only if some printf where present or not, so I'm temporarily printing to stderr.
Sorry for the shameful code, but I tried replacing almost every line by now to spot the problem.
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-13 at 12:37In the sender
function, you have code like this (much shortened)
QUESTION
I am working on a QT project with subdirs, it works just fine on linux (ubuntu) but when I tried to run on windows I get undefinded reference to `moduleInterface::...´ in which ... refers to all the methods on my subdir. The Qt version I am using (5.11.2) is the same in both linux and windows. The subdirs configurations are the following:
main.pro
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-03 at 11:41It looks like a compiling order problem. Probably the linker can't find some symbols because they belong to one of the other sub-projects, but they have not been processed yet.
Try to change your subdirs .pro file as follows:
QUESTION
Im using Python Celery , and using memdump() I get the dump printed. However I was trying to dump the memory into a variable for printing later for instance, or even in logging. Is that possible ?
Thanks !
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-24 at 06:33Yes, if you take a look at the source for celery.utils.debug.memdump
, it takes a file
parameter. This file
parameter is pretty much any data type that can be passed as the file
parameter to print
, including our handy friend io.StringIO
:
QUESTION
TL;DR How can I get the Base::Choose
to accept Derived::CustomUserFunction
as an argument?
The error I'm getting, and I do understand why I get it, but I don't know how to resolve it is:
Argument of type "Derived::* (...)" is incompatible with parameter of type "Base::* (...)"
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Nov-07 at 21:22One way to resolve the problem is define virtual
member functions in UserEvents
and use them in building the map.
Example:
QUESTION
I have a Gradle-based Kotlin project with some Spek tests, which are based on JUnit and should be compatible with Idea.
But I don't see a "Run" menu item in the context menu.
Why? What do I need to do in order to be able to run Spek tests in Idea like other JUnit tests?
Here's my build.gradle
:
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jan-31 at 10:04Have you installed the Spek plugin for IntelliJ?
Just search for spek
in the IntelliJ plugin settings.
QUESTION
For debugging purposes I want to count the number of keys in our memcache server, so I did some research and ended up using the memdump
utility, which seems to come with libmemcached.
In the description of the command it says:
memdump dumps a list of “keys” from all servers that it is told to fetch from. Because memcached does not guarentee to provide all keys it is not possible to get a complete “dump”.
Also on another website (Memcached Cheat Sheet) I read:
[…] The memcache protocol provides commands to peek into the data that is organized by slabs (categories of data of a given size range). There are some significant limitations though:
You can only dump keys per slab class (keys with roughly the same content size)
You can only dump one page per slab class (1MB of data)
This is an unofficial feature that might be removed anytime.
[…]
So what does You can only dump one page per slab class (1MB of data)
mean in practice? One megabyte of data is what? If a slab contains more than 1 MB of data (including keys?) then the remaining data will not be fetched and i might miss some keys?
As an exmaple, I have 3 keys A with 500 KB of data, B with another 600 KB of data and C with 300 KB of data, they all go to the same slab. Then when dumping the keys, only A and B will be dumped with the data (which might then also be cut off?)
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jan-04 at 08:06memdump
utility employs memcache protocol undocumented command stats cachedump
to obtain list of keys by slab id. You can look in stats cachedump
implementation in memcached source code items.c:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install MemDump
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page