Exploitation | Windows Software Exploitation | Hacking library
kandi X-RAY | Exploitation Summary
kandi X-RAY | Exploitation Summary
This repository will hold the exploits for the kernel and user mode vulnerabilities. ![HackSys Team] "HackSys Team").
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Exploitation
Exploitation Key Features
Exploitation Examples and Code Snippets
$ pip install bayesian-optimization
$ conda install -c conda-forge bayesian-optimization
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Exploitation
QUESTION
I am currently learning about binary exploitation. Now i am working with a binary (Linux) that is vulnerable to a stack buffer overflow (ASLR and NX are enabled, and binary is interacted with through network), and i have developed a 2 stage exploit, the first stage leaks the address of the puts
function in libc (from the GOT and leak by calling puts
to send address), and the 2nd stage uses the leaked address to calculate the address of a few ROP gadgets and the execve
function, which is used to gain Remote Code Execution.
The problem is:
I debug the binary in IDA and find the address of puts
and execve
so then i can calculate the offset of execve
from puts
. Lets say this offset is x
. Then when using the exploit, stage 1 leaks address of puts
and then address of execve
is found by puts + x
. This exploit works fine on my installation of Linux, but i have noticed that in other flavours of linux, the offset x
of puts -> execve in libc is different (Assuming because its a different build of libc). So my question is, how can one find the address of another function using a leaked libc address, for a different Linux flavour which has an unknown offset.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-11 at 16:37This exploit works fine on my installation of Linux, but i have noticed that in other flavours of linux, the offset x of puts -> execve in libc is different (Assuming because its a different build of libc).
Correct: the address will change depending on exact GLIBC source, exact version of compiler and linker used, compilation flags, etc.
In short, you can know this offset for a specific version of libc6
package in a specific Linux distribution, but there are probably a 100 different variants in common use on any given day.
So my question is, how can one find the address of another function using a leaked libc address, for a different Linux flavour which has an unknown offset.
You can't.
The only things you could do are
- download common versions of GLIBC for common distributions, compute the offset on each one, and try them all one by one, or
- guess that the offset isn't very different between the systems (you can confirm whether this is in fact true by doing above step), and just try all values between
[x - N, x + N]
(whereN
is the guest maximum of the possible deviations).
QUESTION
I need to convert a string such as 5555555547aa
into a string of characters (that one would be �GUUUU
). I have a function working in python2 which is posted below, but I can't get anything to work right in python3. How would I do this?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-27 at 20:39You just need to combine 2 steps: convert from hex to a bytestring with bytes.fromhex
, and to print a bytestring to stdout using sys.stdout.buffer.write
. Putting it all together:
QUESTION
I am trying to reproduce an example given in the book "The Art of Exploitation" by Jon Erickson. The procedure is actually pretty simple: I want to give commandline-arguments to my program and examine their memory addresses using lldb. The C class looks something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-15 at 21:08The book looks to be written for 32-bit code, but your system is 64-bit. So the pointers are 64 bits each. Try x/3xg arg_list
, where the g
is for "giant", gdb's size letter for an 8-byte object. This should give you three 64-bit values starting with 0x00007ffeefbffbb8
and then you can x/s 0x00007ffeefbffbb8
.
(You may want to find a different book that matches your system better, or set up a 32-bit Linux VM for following along with it.)
QUESTION
I am reading the book Hacking: The Art of Exploitation, 2nd Edition and in the simple C program
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-07 at 19:40sub esp,0x10
allocated 16 bytes (four registers worth) of space on the stack for variables and other stuff.
mov DWORD PTR [ebp-0xc],0x0
appears to be the first reference to slot ebp-0xc
, and it's being initialized to zero. After looking at cmp DWORD PTR [ebp-0xc],0x9
at main+60
I'm certain this is i = 0
from the initialization section of the for
loop.
The compiler can put variables where it will, and while deterministic it changes with patch versions of the compiler.
QUESTION
Web-scraping with PowerShell Issue: My code won't pull in the needed information. Why?
My code up to this point will pull the correct information. the info it shows is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-01 at 02:06Replace:
QUESTION
I am going through the book Hacking : The Art of Exploitation which uses 32bit assembly, and my machine is 64 bit. Now I understand that's not a great thing, but this is the question.
As I debug this program,
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-08 at 02:20Probably easiest to just build 32-bit executables so you can follow the book more closely, with gcc -m32
. Don't try to port a tutorial to another OS or ISA while you're learning from it, that rarely goes well. (e.g. different calling conventions, not just different sizes.)
And in GDB, use set disassembly-flavor intel
to get GAS .intel_syntax noprefix
disassembly like your book shows, instead of the default AT&T syntax. For objdump, use objdump -drwC -Mintel
. See also How to remove "noise" from GCC/clang assembly output? for more about looking at GCC ouptut.
(See https://stackoverflow.com/tags/att/info vs. https://stackoverflow.com/tags/intel_syntax/info).
Both instructions are a dword store of an immediate 0, to an offset of -4 relative to where the frame pointer is pointing. (This is how it implements i=0
because you compiled with optimization disabled.)
QUESTION
I have a Node class
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-06 at 16:49You can use the sort()
method of the Array
.
QUESTION
I am trying to develop shellcode to do a binary exploitation exercise. One of the instructions that I need to print out to a file is a NOP (0x90). For whatever reason, my Python environment (running on Ubuntu 20.04) hangs whenever I try to print out this character. In other words, I cannot run any other line of Python code unless I Ctrl-D out of the environment and use the python command again. This does not happen with other unprintable characters. To show you want I mean, here is an example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-13 at 20:30Open the file in binary mode and use write
rather than print
.
Put a b
in front of the '\x90' to make it a byte string.
QUESTION
I am examining this code snippet from Ericksons Hacking: The Art of Exploitation:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-13 at 20:09The instruction push rbp
accomplishes the same as sub rsp, 8; mov QWORD PTR[rsp], rbp;
. It first moves the stack pointer (rsp
) up 8 bytes (this is because the size of a register in x86-64 is 8 bytes i.e. 64 bits), then moves the value of the register at the memory location pointed by it. Therefore, the value of rsp
, which was 0x7fffffffdfc8
, becomes 0x7fffffffdfc0
, which is 8 less than before.
QUESTION
I’m trying to parse a page and I’m having some issue with special characters such as é è à, etc.
According to the Firefox page information tool, the page is encoded in UTF - 8
My code is the following :
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-14 at 20:14The requests library takes a strict approach to the decoding of web pages. On the other hand, BeautifulSoup has powerful tools for determining the encoding of text. So it's better to pass the raw response from the request to BeautifulSoup, and let BeautifulSoup try to determine the encoding.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Exploitation
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page