DocIt | generates documentation templates for functions
kandi X-RAY | DocIt Summary
kandi X-RAY | DocIt Summary
DocIt 0.91 Alpha by Kapil Ratnani. A plugin for Notepad++, which aids in documentation. It generates documentation templates for functions. Currently it supports C/CPP, Java and PHP. Don Ho for Notepad++ Creators of PCRE. -Fixed PHP doc string format. -Separate plugin for each type of language -Still statically linked pcre -Support for PHP. -First Release -Statically linked pcre -Rough code..not refractored at all -Just works.. -Support for c/cpp and java.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of DocIt
DocIt Key Features
DocIt Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on DocIt
QUESTION
What can cause loss from model.get_latest_training_loss()
increase on each epoch?
Code, used for training:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-24 at 18:22Up through gensim 3.6.0, the loss value reported may not be very sensible, only resetting the tally each call to train()
, rather than each internal epoch. There are some fixes forthcoming in this issue:
https://github.com/RaRe-Technologies/gensim/pull/2135
In the meantime, the difference between the previous value, and the latest, may be more meaningful. In that case, your data suggest the 1st epoch had a total loss of 745896, while the last had (9676936-9280568=) 396,368 – which may indicate the kind of progress hoped-for.
QUESTION
I'm training doc2vec, and using callbacks trying to see if alpha is decreasing over training time using this code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-19 at 19:28The model.alpha
property only holds the initially-configured starting-alpha
– it's not updated to the effective learning-rate through training.
So, even if the value is being decreased properly (and I expect that it is), you wouldn't see it in the logging you've added.
Separate observations about your code:
in gensim versions at least through 3.5.0, maximum training throughput is most often reached with some value for
workers
between 3 and the number of cores – but usually not the full number of cores (if it's higher than 12) or larger. Soworkers=multiprocessing.cpu_count()*4
is likely going to much slower than what you could achieve with a lower number.if your corpus is large enough to support 600-dimensional vectors, and discarding words with fewer than
min_count=10
examples, negative sampling may work faster and get better results than thehs
mode. (The pattern in published work seems to be to prefer negative-sampling with larger corpuses.)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install DocIt
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page