purge | 512-bit block encryption algorithm , specially for x64 | Cryptography library
kandi X-RAY | purge Summary
kandi X-RAY | purge Summary
Purge - 512 bit, 30 rounds symmetric encryption algorithm, designed for x64 bit archs. Free and opensource. Free from NSA, goverments and other shit. Just only an cleaning instrument. Easy for customise, recompile, use for custom cipher systems. Here is a round some. Use PurgeEvasionUtils.h to perform cryptography operations like enc/dec/hash. See for better security integrations.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of purge
purge Key Features
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on purge
QUESTION
My bot is not responding to any commands except for the .purge command.
Here is my code.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 02:21You used the message
parameter instead of command
. Instead of message === 'xxx'
put command === 'xxx'
. Simple mistake, I think that was what you meant anyways. Of course the purge command worked because you put command === 'purge' there
QUESTION
Good day,
I am trying to create the below procedure that will update a table (annouce_form) based on a job category, plus I would like to know if it is possible to include multiple update commands in one procedure:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 07:06Well, this is wrong:
QUESTION
I installed Imagick through apt-get install
. However the version it installed was old (6.9.7) and does not have all the delegates I need built in.
So I thought I uninstalled it using apt-get remove --purge imagemagick
and reinstalled it from source.
Currently identify -version
gives me the correct version I just installed (6.9.12) however php -r "print_r(Imagick::getVersion());"
still shows v 6.9.7.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 00:46sudo apt-get purge package-name
QUESTION
I recently performed a rather large update to this web app, and for the most part it went off without a hitch... Until the app tries to send an SMS notification from staging/production.
The upgrade from laravel 7.x to 8.x was quite simple and straightforward. At the same time we also installed Laravel Horizon. Everything went according to plan, and all works fine locally.
When we deploy to staging/production however, queued SMS notifications fail with the following exception:
ReflectionException: Class Http\Adapter\Guzzle6\Client does not exist in /home/forge/dev.example.com/releases/20210609194554/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Container/Container.php:836
Looking in the stack trace we can see that Nexmo is the culprit:
#5 /home/forge/dev.example.com/releases/20210609194554/vendor/nexmo/laravel/src/NexmoServiceProvider.php(150): Illuminate\Foundation\Application->make()
However in our composer.json file we are requiring Guzzle 7 with the following:
"guzzlehttp/guzzle": "^7.3",
It is worth mentioning again at this point, I have no issues sending SMS locally, the main difference between local and staging environments is that locally I use Laravel Valet and Staging uses Laravel Envoyer.
What I've tried so far:
- Changing
"guzzlehttp/guzzle": "^7.3"
to"guzzlehttp/guzzle": "^6.5|^7.3"
- Running
php artisan horizon:purge
andphp artisan horizon:terminate
both manually and in a deployment hook. - Restarting the laravel horizon daemon on forge.
- trying
php artisan queue:restart
- running
composer dump-autoload
andcomposer dump-autoload -o
- deleting composer.lock and the vendor/ directory from current/ then running
composer install
- Restarting PHP, Nginx, and eventually the entire server :(
and more...
Any help is greatly appreciated
UPDATE Below:
Complete composer.json:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 23:40I see that the NexmoServiceProvider
is trying to use the defined http_client
in the config, so can you share what the .env
has for NEXMO_HTTP_CLIENT
? I am pretty sure you have something wrong there or even not defined.
And this is what it is defined in the config/nexmo.php
related to that config:
QUESTION
I would like to remove messages that are scheduled to be delivered to a specific queue but i'm finding the process to be unnecessarily burdensome.
Here I am sending a blank message to a queue with a delay:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 04:00In order to remove specific messages you need to know the ID which you can get via a browse of the scheduled messages. The only other option available is to use the start and stop time options in the remove operations to remove all messages inside a range.
QUESTION
@bot.command()
async def suggest(ctx,*,suggestion):
# await ctx.channel.purge(limit = 1)
emojis = ['✅','❌']
channel = bot.get_channel(xxxxxxxxxxxx)
await ctx.send('Your Suggestion has been sent, will be reviewed by admin shortly')
suggestEmbed = discord.Embed(colour=0x28da5b)
suggestEmbed=discord.Embed(title="Suggestion Bot", description="Please mark ✅ or ❌ depending on whether you want to take this suggestion or not", color=0x28da5b)
message = await channel.send(embed = suggestEmbed)
await message.add_reaction('✅')
await message.add_reaction('❌')
sendEmbed = discord.Embed(colour = 0x28da5b)
sendEmbed.add_field(name = 'New Suggestion!', value = f'{suggestion}')
try:
reaction, user = await bot.wait_for('reaction_add')
while reaction.message == message:
if str(reaction.emoji) == "✅":
await ctx.send("🚀🚀🚀 Yay! Your suggestion has been approved, We thank you for your valuable time!")
await ctx.send("Your Suggestion was: ")
message1 = await ctx.send(embed = sendEmbed)
await channel.send("The above suggestion has been approved, this post will no longer be active")
return
if str(reaction.emoji) == "❌":
await ctx.send("🙇♀️🙇♀️ Sorry! Your suggestion has not been approved, We thank you for your valuable time!")
await ctx.send("Your Suggestion was: ")
message1 = await ctx.send(embed = sendEmbed)
await channel.send("The above suggestion has not been approved, this post will no longer be active")
return
except Exception:
return
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 12:21since you haven't defined a check
, it's also taking the bot's input of reactions. defined a check function
QUESTION
I wanted to make a help command for the bot which shows the prefix of the specific guild. Here is my help.js
file :-
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 07:50The reason why you're getting undefinded
when requiring
the prefix
from your main.js
is that you're never exporting
a value
.
If you'd want to get your prefix
by using require
you have to do this:
QUESTION
I leak a credentials on a file in my feature branch. A reviewer caught the mistake, showing the hash commit, lets call it a6859b6
, when the bad info was introduced and asked me to safely remove. I edited the file, squashed all commits in my branch and forced push.
Then the PR got approved, and merged into master. My branch is deleted on remote and locally. The commit log of master doesn't show any presence of the "bad" commit a6859b6
Surprisingly, querying remote on the exact commit hash https://gitlab.com/blabla/-/commit/a6859b6 still show the offending code.
Is it by design? How do we call this kind of "orphan" commits? What does git do with these and is it possible to purge a specific orphan commit?
EDIT: GitLab answered to my support ticket
Advise to rotate the leak creds.
GitLab has a housekeeping process which prunes the loose commits on the remote repo automatically every 2 weeks
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 18:57Is it by design?
Yes, git does not instantly delete objects once they are not referenced. This may be done eventually by the GC (git gc
). Not instantly removing such references makes it easy for you to recover lost data using git reflog
(as long as you have added/committed the data previously).
How do we call this kind of "orphan" commits?
You can call them loose objects/commit. This name is also used in the docs.
What does git do with these and is it possible to purge a specific orphan commit?
Git may eventually decide to clean these up (depending on gc.auto
). This can also be done manually by running git gc --prune=now
in the repository where you want to remove it (you need shell access). If you have a long reference chain referencing the object that is not referenced any more, you may want to add --aggressive
: git gc --aggressive --prune=now
.
If you don't have direct access, you could mirror the repository, run git gc --prune=now
, delete the remote repository, recreate an empty repository and push everything from your local mirror.
Anyways, I would strongly recommend you to change/invalidate the leaked credentials as soon as possible as people could already have downloaded your commit (and the reviewer has seen those, too). When you are sure that your leaked credentials are not valid anywhere, you don't need to worry about unreferenced commits.
QUESTION
For some reason a few styles don't seem to be working in production build hosted on Netlify. This seems to only be happening on a single component. It's a wrapper located at ./layout/FormLayout.tsx
(don't know if that changes anything). Here is the wrapper:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-04 at 22:58For anyone seeing this in the future, just add any new folder to the tailwind config like this:
QUESTION
I have a cluster of Artemis in Kubernetes with 3 group of master/slave:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 01:56I've taken your simplified configured with just 2 nodes using a non-wildcard queue with redistribution-delay
of 0
, and I reproduced the behavior you're seeing on my local machine (i.e. without Kubernetes). I believe I see why the behavior is such, but in order to understand the current behavior you first must understand how redistribution works in the first place.
In a cluster every time a consumer is created the node on which the consumer is created notifies every other node in the cluster about the consumer. If other nodes in the cluster have messages in their corresponding queue but don't have any consumers then those other nodes redistribute their messages to the node with the consumer (assuming the message-load-balancing
is ON_DEMAND
and the redistribution-delay
is >= 0
).
In your case however, the node with the messages is actually down when the consumer is created on the other node so it never actually receives the notification about the consumer. Therefore, once that node restarts it doesn't know about the other consumer and does not redistribute its messages.
I see you've opened ARTEMIS-3321 to enhance the broker to deal with this situation. However, that will take time to develop and release (assuming the change is approved). My recommendation to you in the mean-time would be to configure your client reconnection which is discussed in the documentation, e.g.:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install purge
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page