lvgl | Embedded graphics library to create beautiful UIs
kandi X-RAY | lvgl Summary
kandi X-RAY | lvgl Summary
Powerful and easy-to-use embedded GUI library with many widgets, advanced visual effects (opacity, antialiasing, animations) and low memory requirements (16K RAM, 64K Flash).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of lvgl
lvgl Key Features
lvgl Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on lvgl
QUESTION
I'm implementing a sample application on SeeedStudio's Wio Terminal with LVGL. I followed the LVGL's porting tutorial and came up with the following:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-13 at 22:36Arduino Studio IDE has a flaw regarding compilation: only files in src
subfolder of the sketch gets copied to the tmp folder and compiled. So all non-standard libraries should be placed in src
subfolder in sketch folder.
QUESTION
I have a problem with memory allocation in C and LVGL. The first part is the definitions.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-30 at 17:08Here's what is not working
QUESTION
I have Makefile below that should build all new *.c files I will place in current folder. But this not happens. I have created new file with name mouse_cursor_icon.c
and place in the same folder together with main_btn.c
. I was expecting make command will build and generate mouse_cursor_icon.o
file. But this not happened. How to solve that?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-27 at 00:07Normal make does not have any (good) way of saying "build all of the .c files in a directory." GNU make has extensions that allow this sort of thing: it defines a wildcard
function that can be used to get all the (source) files that match some pattern. For example, you might add to your Makefile:
QUESTION
I have Makefile
below that treats $(CC)
varaible as cc
. Variable $(BB)
is treated gcc
as expected. Why $(CC)
is treated as cc
and not gcc
?
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-19 at 12:04BB ?= gcc
CC ?= gcc
all:
echo $(CC)
echo $(BB)
QUESTION
There is a fork of micropython, which incorporates lvgl
(a gui).
Nearly all lvgl
-related code is separate from the micropython code beside some few overlapps.
These overlapps are related to certain (sub-)directories.
Using the lvgl-fork
as "ours
" and the Git repo of micropython as "theirs
", I could merge theirs
into ours
with overwrite (-X
) ... and loose the overlapping parts.
Or I could merge without using -X
resulting in "thousands" :) of conflicts, which are no real conflicts but updates since the great majority of code of micropython wasn't touched by lvgl
.
Since this is a firmware, which is difficult to debug and flashing as such isn't THAT healthy for a flash memory, I don't want to experiment that much... :)
Is there a way to do a kind of a "git merge with forced overwrite except for the following directories, in which I want to get conflicts if there are any" ?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-07 at 07:23That does not seem trivial to do, but you might consider:
- a first merge (-X): you get one commit, but with the overlapping part overriden
- a second merge between dedicate branches, each one representing the few subfolders you need to pay attention to during said merge.
The idea regarding the latter point is that you can isolate a folder in its own branch using git substree split
Extract a new, synthetic project history from the history of the
subtree.
The new history includes only the commits (including merges) that affected, and each of those commits now has the contents of at the root of the project instead of in a subdirectory.
Thus, the newly created history is suitable for export as a separate git repository.
You can see that approach used in "How do I merge a sub directory in Git?", where you have two branches, but want to merge only the history of dir-1
from branch-a
into branch-b
.
That is what you want to do in the second step I mention above.
QUESTION
I have a problem I have previously never encountered in my life.
CONTEXTI have a C program which I cross compile for an ARM device. I use the LVGL library which is a graphics lib for embedded/light systems.
I have organized my project in a MVC like manner - all the views are in a folder called "screens", which has, like all other folders in the src folder of my project, its own Makefile, called by the main Makefile.
Specifically, the screens folder mostly contains files called "image_x.c", "screen_x.c" - the "image" file being a C file generated by an online converted, putting an image in an array, and the "screen" file being the source code I require to declare a screen, load an image, attach it to this screen and display that screen. This is a structure that functions, as I have used it until now, pretty much copying and pasting files and changing things in them according to my needs.
PROBLEMFor some reason, this time, one file is simply ignored by the makefile, despite being in it AND being in the folder.
I get the following error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-12 at 12:22The line appends to a variable called CRSCS
, while it should be CSRCS
. Two characters got swapped.
QUESTION
I have a project which contains a git sub-module, both are hosted on GitHub.
The sub-module sources are built as part of the project, and changes in the sub-module could affect the containing project.
My goal is to make sure the sub-module does not break the containing project.
For that purpose I'm trying to create a GitHub action on the submodule repo that does the following upon push/pull:
- Clone the containing project
- Check out the submodule with the specific push/PR SHA
- Build the project with the submodule
The standard Checkout v2 action does not support such workflow.
Instead, I'm cloning and checking out the submodule according to $GITHUB_SHA
, like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-10 at 23:36I found the answer here:
https://frontside.com/blog/2020-05-26-github-actions-pull_request/#how-does-pull_request-affect-actionscheckout
Apparently, in case of PR, github.sha
(or $GITHUB_SHA
) represents the SHA of the resulting commit that was created from merging the base to the head, and not the SHA of the base change commit itself.
To obtain it, I needed to fetch refs/pull/*/merge
instead of refs/pull/*/head
.
Now this run step makes more sense:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install lvgl
Check the Online demos to see LVGL in action (3 minutes)
Read the Introduction page of the documentation (5 minutes)
Get familiar with the basics on the Quick overview page (15 minutes)
Set up a Simulator (10 minutes)
Try out some Examples
Port LVGL to a board. See the Porting guide or check the ready to use Projects
Read the Overview page to get a better understanding of the library (2-3 hours)
Check the documentation of the Widgets to see their features and usage
If you have questions go to the Forum
Read the Contributing guide to see how you can help to improve LVGL (15 minutes)
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page