lwt | Lightweight terminal | Command Line Interface library
kandi X-RAY | lwt Summary
kandi X-RAY | lwt Summary
lwt is a lightweight terminal emulator based on the VTE and GTK libraries.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of lwt
lwt Key Features
lwt Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on lwt
QUESTION
What are your preferred techniques for combining a table with a plot in one image using R? I remember using tableGrob() and either patchwork or cowplot months ago but cannot remember the details.
This example uses the ggstatsplot package. I would like to add the correlation coefficients to the correlogram (correlation plot).
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 18:49The key elemnent is tableGrob()
from gridExtra
package!
We could use grid.arrange()
.
For the table use tableGrob()
to create a table like the plot of a data frame. Then you can use it with grid.arrange()
function.
QUESTION
I have a windows service that is uploading a multipart data form in C#. It is uploading a csv with authentication variables in the form: a key, a context, and a uuid. The variables are set in a custom Token class. Each time I try to upload, I get a 403 error.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-25 at 19:37I went the route of using Postman to create my request, then got the generated code for C# with the RestSharp NuGet Package.
QUESTION
I am trying to use Flow-Type in a react native project by using npm package flow-bin. but when I try to run flow, it gives an error Unix.Unix_error(Unix.ENOTSOCK, "select", "")
. I have been looking for a solution but no luck so far. Following are the details of the error. Plus; I have tried to completely uninstall nodejs and installed it again but still the same result.
Any help would be highly appreciated!!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-24 at 14:52Found this reason.
It turned out somehow Astril VPN was causing flow server to crash. even though it was only installed and not running. After uninstalling Astril flow works like a charm.
If someone encounters a similar problem, then they should try to uninstall their VPN/Proxy software. I am not sure if other VPN software can cause this issue because I have only used Astril.
QUESTION
In my LAN there are several MQTT-enabled devices (Tasmota) and I am writing an MQTT client (Javascript, through mosquitto websocket and PAHO client library).
Which is the best way to discover all online devices in the LAN and their corresponding device name? I thought using the LWT message that every device sends, but I don't know how to subscribe to all LWT message from unknown devices.
The LWT "Online" messages are coming through with this path: tele//LWT
, but I don't want to subscribe to ALL "tele" messages, as they are too many.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-31 at 17:19You can use single level wildcard topics.
e.g.
QUESTION
I have a function called after wifi is connected to setup my mqtt connection. But for some reason it panics when my reconnect timer should be setup.
The arguments to alarm
are correct ?!
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-04 at 09:25This is a known bug that will be fixed with PR #3263. We will merge it in the next hours or days.
QUESTION
Thank you for taking a crack at my question! I am implementing a conditional logistic regression in Stata. I have choice data in long format where every choice consists of two available options and the decision-maker can only pick one. I have implemented it using the Stata clogit
command, which in my understanding creates fixed effects for every choice in the data and partials them out before regressing the dependent variable on remaining explanatory variables in the logistic regression. To convince myself that clogit
does what I think it does, I tried to reproduce the results I got using the logit
command and adding the fixed effects manually. FWIW that is not straightforward with large data sets given Stata's limit on the number of explanatory variables, but the problem persists in the following smaller MWE:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-21 at 04:13The difference in estimates that you're observing is the bias due to the incidental parameters problem from estimating logit
in a finite panel.
See Greene (2004) for a discussion of this bias, and note that the bias is (1) away from zero, and (2) as high as 100% when T=2.
In your case T is not time, but the number of individuals in the pair (i.e. 2), thus you should expect the bias to be in the neighbourhood of 100%.
If you reread the pdf documentation for clogit
, in particular the second paragraph of the Fixed-effects logit section under Remarks and examples you'll see how clogit
avoids this problem.
Since the bias from using logit
as you do is 100% relative to clogit
the relationship you document between estimated coefficients is the expected behaviour (or really misbehaviour in the logit
case) of the two estimators.
QUESTION
When a client is connected to the MQTT broker, the broker checks to make sure that the client is still connected.
If the client suddenly disconnects and reconnects relatively quickly, it may connect before the previous client disconnects. The new client connects with the same client ID as the previous client.
When this happens, it is my understanding that the previous client's connection is evicted from the broker. Does this eviction trigger an LWT being sent? If so, is there a way to prevent the LWT for the first client from being sent to any other client subscribed to the topic?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-07 at 18:08No, the LWT is not sent (at least not with mosquitto) and wouldn't be because the keepalive has not expired.
This can be tested easily with mosquitto
and the mosquitto_sub
- start
mosquitto
on port 1889 withmosquitto -p 1889
- start first
mosquitto_sub
instance withmosquitto_sub -p 1889 -i foo -v -t '#' --will-topic bar --will-payload "testing"
- start second
mosquitto_sub
(to listen for the LWT) withmosquitto_sub -p 1889 -v -t '#'
- start third
mosquitto_sub
with same client id usingmosquitto_sub -p 1889 -i foo -v -t '#'
You should see the 1st & 3rd clients kicking each other off the broker in the mosquitto log (as written to stdout) and the 2nd shouldn't show any LWT messages being published.
QUESTION
We have a 3-node Cassandra cluster (single DC), and a table that get accessed (for read/writes) by applications running on separate nodes.
Under heavy load, when both instances of the application are attempting to update the same user entry (E.g. add attribute) we observe that update from app1
(running on node1
succeeded - i.e. ResultSet#wasApplied
returns true
). However, when app2
(on node2
reads the data, it is getting stale data before app1
updated it).
I'd like to know why this is happening because LTW with serial consistency should prevent this type of inconsistencies. Any help is much appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
Example: (based on application logs)
- Initially the user has attribute
A
with value1
- Both
app1
andapp2
are adding new attributes;app1
addingB:2
andapp2
addingC:3
app1
read the correct data into memory, added new attributeB
and wrote to Cassandra successfully. The logs show the final attribute list havingA:1
andB:2
tuples.app2
reads the data, but only seeA:1
(the difference in time between the logs fromapp1
andapp2
is only 2ms; therefore could have happened in any order).- Once
app2
's write is completed, the end state only hasA:1
andC:2
, which is incorrect.
More Information
The (prepared statements that perform) reads and writes to the table have the following characteristics:
- Write is a LWT (on IF EXISTS userid)
- Writes on the table are performed with a consistency level of LOCAL_QUORUM
- Reads on the table are performed with a consistency level of LOCAL_SERIAL
The table looks like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-07 at 08:19Because the read/writes were happening on 2 different nodes, we weren't synchronising the operations at the application level.
app2
was doing the read
before app1
was started the write. Therefore, app1
got the stale data (not stale data). The update
operation set the entire map instead of add/removing the elements to/from the map.
We've changed the logic, so the add/remove operations are now doing an add (and remove respectively) instead of doing a "read and then set".
The new prepared statement looks something like:
QUESTION
I need, if possible, to remove, in place, duplicate lines in a path with multiple text files, in powershell.
I've found a way to get the list of lines:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-16 at 22:40Your explanation from Edit #3 makes even less sense I think. What is this task actually for?
QUESTION
I'm trying to understand this line:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-25 at 04:16Lwt.return_unit
is a ready-made value of type unit Lwt.t
, in other words, a promise which does absolutely nothing. Both Icmpv4_socket.connect
and disconnect
are defined to evaluate to this do-nothing value, which means they are explicitly doing nothing.
Where the value that is filled is a function with paremeter
stack
Actually, the value that is filled is stack
itself. The reason the code is written like this:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install lwt
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page