branches | /branches of old svn repository | Identity Management library

by obspy C Version: Current License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets(3)Community Discussions(10)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | branches Summary

branches is a C library typically used in Security, Identity Management applications. branches has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This repository is not intended to be further worked on. Instead it is only intended to keep the old svn branches directory available after shutdown of the svn server. Parts of the repository including the respective history of changes can be transferred into other git repositories following the instructions in the ObsPy wiki (cloning this repository and modifying the history to exclude the unwanted parts). If you need help doing so open an issue.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

branches has a low active ecosystem.

It has 5 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are 8 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

branches has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of branches is current.

Quality

branches has no bugs reported.

Security

branches has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

branches does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

branches releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of branches

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

branches Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for branches.

branches Examples and Code Snippets

Return the number of branches up to n .

python

Lines of Code : 34

License : Permissive (MIT License)

Copy

def climb_stairs(n: int) -> int:
    """
    LeetCdoe No.70: Climbing Stairs
    Distinct ways to climb a n step staircase where
    each time you can either climb 1 or 2 steps.

    Args:
        n: number of steps of staircase

    Returns:

Given a list of branches and a set of xla .

python

Lines of Code : 13

License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)

Copy

def _make_intermediates_match_xla(branch_graphs, branch_intermediates):
  """Like _make_intermediates_match but for the XLA case."""
  new_branch_intermediates = []
  for i, branch_graph in enumerate(branch_graphs):
    other_fakeparams = _create_fak

add all branches in a given directory

javascript

Lines of Code : 3

License : Permissive (MIT License)

Copy

async function addAll(opts: { cwd: string }) {
  await git(['add', '-A'], { cwd: opts.cwd });
}

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on branches

Change the source "Branch" in Azure Static Web App

Git: Copy folder from master to the root of another branch

I rebased only a branch. Is it possible to move the others as well?

Git Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by checkout

How can I create a branch in a detached HEAD?

How to pull an upstream branch that doesn't yet exist in my forked remote origin repo?

Git confusing command to do a deploy

Git Branch and Fork Questions - Conflicts

How to force a symfony version on github actions when testing a bundle

Why doesn't `git update-ref -d` delete empty parent directories?

QUESTION

Change the source "Branch" in Azure Static Web App

Asked 2021-Jun-15 at 16:36

When setting up an Azure Static WebApp when I chose GitHub as the source provider, the UI provides an option to choose from one of the existing branches. But once the app is created I don't see any option to change the source. Whereas in Azure "App Service", you can disconnect from GitHub and establish the connection again with a different branch.

So, Is it possible to change the source branch in Azure SWA?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 16:36

You might've sorted it out by now, but this confused me as well and it turns out that you set this up on the deployment setup. In my case I'm using DevOps/Pipelines, and on the pipeline (equivalent to Github Actions) you can choose which branch to source from. Then you run the pipeline, and that will automatically change the source in the Static Web app.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67515286

QUESTION

Git: Copy folder from master to the root of another branch

Asked 2021-Jun-15 at 13:28

I have a static website which is generating an output folder to the MyBlog/output in the master branch. But I want output to be the source of my GH Pages, I am looking for a way to use output as the root of gh-pages branch.

That's my deploy.yml

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 13:28

Ok, this should work. Remove the last line - run: git push from your action. Then add the following.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67985160

QUESTION

I rebased only a branch. Is it possible to move the others as well?

Asked 2021-Jun-15 at 09:08

I was working with a repo where both origin/master and master were in the same commit. I created several branches one on top of the other. Something like

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 04:30

Yes. Depending on if the other branches have new commits:

If the other branches have new commits of their own, simply check each one out and git rebase origin/master.
If the other branches don't have new commits of their own, while on a branch you wish to duplicate, you can just re-create the others with git branch -f branchDothis, etc. for each branch. Note you could delete them and recreate them, or use the -f flag which mean "force create even if it already exists". The end result is the same.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67979921

QUESTION

Git Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by checkout

Asked 2021-Jun-15 at 08:16

I have two branches, master and feature.

feature branch is derived from master branch and has 3 more commits. It has uncommitted changes as well.

At this point, I was going to update the master with these uncommitted changes.

So I did git checkout master but it throws me an error Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by checkout.

What I can't understand is that sometimes I was able to switch the branch with uncommitted changes, and sometimes I wasn't.

Could you anyone let me know when I can and can't switch the tab with uncommitted changes ?
And in my above situation, how can I update the master branch for only those uncommitted changes?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 08:16

What I can't understand is that sometimes I was able to switch the branch with uncommitted changes, and sometimes I wasn't.

Because there are currently common files between master and features: switching branches would mean overriding the current modification on those common files, which Git actively prevents.

If there are no common files (like new private files in feature, not yet added/committed), then you can switch back and forth between branch.

Do add and commit first (or git stash), then switch branch (with git switch rather than git checkout (since Git 2.23).

If you want to update master only with the new changes (and not the previous 3 commits), I would recommend, especially if you are the only one working on feature, to do an interactive rebase of feature first, in which you reorder commits, and put the last one first:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67982153

QUESTION

How can I create a branch in a detached HEAD?

Asked 2021-Jun-15 at 04:50

While using git I have two branches. One points to the origin/master. The other one to a different branch. In between there are a series of commits.

One commit after the origin/master there is this commit:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 04:50

Is it any different? How?

It isn't really different. The problem has been that checkout is so dreadfully overloaded. So, in 2019, Git was updated with two new commands, switch and restore, that do between them, with greater clarity and predictability, much of the work that checkout used to do. They are termed "experimental" but I've been using them very happily.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67979802

QUESTION

How to pull an upstream branch that doesn't yet exist in my forked remote origin repo?

Asked 2021-Jun-14 at 21:54

Another branch was created on the upstream repo. Let's call it features/demo. Three branches now exist, Master, Develop and features/demo.

My forked repo only has Master and Develop. The forked repo is set as the origin and is my local cloned copy.

How do I pull the upstream branch into my local? Every time I try it wants to merge into Develop or Master because that's what any new branch I make is checked out from.

Edit:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 21:54

How do I pull the upstream branch into my local? Every time I try it wants to merge

That's the definition of pull as delivered (with factory-default options): fetch and merge.

You just want to fetch. At the factory default settings,

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67974782

QUESTION

Git confusing command to do a deploy

Asked 2021-Jun-14 at 07:43

I'm working on a big project that has two "main" git branches: master and develop. The first one (master) is the production branch, the second one (develop) is the staging branch.

The last days I worked on develop and today I have to do a deploy. Some colleagues told me the steps to do that:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 07:39

git pull origin develop is supposed to update your local develop branch with other commits pushed on that same branch.

I would recommend setting first:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67966363

QUESTION

Git Branch and Fork Questions - Conflicts

Asked 2021-Jun-13 at 20:51

Trying to figure out what happens in particular cases when there are multiple branches and/or a fork off of a master branch and how that might cause conflicts.

Say I have the following case where black is the master branch, red is a branch, and green is a branch:

The green branch occurs after the red branch and is merged back into main before red. When red is merged - will there be conflicts?

Now say that red is a branch but green is a fork. Red branches before green is forked. Green has makes code changes and then sends a pull request to the master, who accepts and imports changes. the red merges back into main. Will there be conflicts in that case?

Thanks in advance.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 20:51

The answer is neither yes nor no, but it depends.

A conflict occurs when two developers, regardeless of the branch in which they operate, change the same line of code, or a file is deleted by one, but changed by the other.

In this article at https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/using-branches/merge-conflicts#:~:text=Conflicts%20generally%20arise%20when%20two,automatically%20determine%20what%20is%20correct.&text=Git%20will%20mark%20the%20file,and%20halt%20the%20merging%20process. you may find a lot of information about this topic.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67962493

QUESTION

How to force a symfony version on github actions when testing a bundle

Asked 2021-Jun-13 at 16:21

I'm trying to test a bundle on different versions of Symfony with github actions. I tried to configure my job as explained in Best practices for reusable bundles

Here is my job:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 16:21

It seems that export command isn't environment-proof.

Finally, I removed these lines:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67959657

QUESTION

Why doesn't `git update-ref -d` delete empty parent directories?

Asked 2021-Jun-13 at 14:08

There are various types of refs in git, some of the most common of which are branches (stored in .git/refs/heads), remote-tracking branches (.git/refs/remotes), and tags (.git/refs/tags).

But it's also possible to create and use arbitrary non-standard refs that live elsewhere under .git/refs. This can be useful for storing custom metadata in the repository that you don't expect users will want to interact with directly. For example, GitHub uses these kinds of refs to expose references to pull request branches, and the Emacs git client Magit uses them to save uncommitted changes periodically, when the appropriate setting is enabled. Such refs would generally need to be manipulated using the so-called "plumbing" commands of git, since the user-facing "porcelain" commands don't know about or support them.

I was playing around with non-standard refs using the plumbing command git update-ref and found some odd behavior:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-May-19 at 13:49

No, it's by design. Here is a comment from the source code:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67604566

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install branches

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: