set_user | PostgreSQL extension allowing privilege escalation
kandi X-RAY | set_user Summary
kandi X-RAY | set_user Summary
This PostgreSQL extension allows switching users and optional privilege escalation with enhanced logging and control. It provides an additional layer of logging and control when unprivileged users must escalate themselves to superuser or object owner roles in order to perform needed maintenance tasks. Specifically, when an allowed user executes set_user(text) or set_user_u(text), several actions occur:. Only users with EXECUTE permission on set_user_u(text) may escalate to superuser. Additionally, all rules in Superuser Allowlist apply to set_user.superuser_allowlist and set_user_u(text). Postgres roles calling set_user(text) can only transition to roles listed or included in set_user.nosuperuser_target_allowlist (defaults to all roles). Additionally the logic in Nosuperuser Allowlist applies to current_user when set_user() is invoked. Additionally, with set_user('rolename','token') the token is stored for the lifetime of the session.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of set_user
set_user Key Features
set_user Examples and Code Snippets
#################################
# OS command line, terminal 1
#################################
psql -U postgres
---------------------------------
-- psql command line, terminal 1
---------------------------------
SELECT rolname FROM pg_authid WH
$> initdb -D /path/to/data/directory
$> createdb
$> vi $PGDATA/postgresql.conf
# Add set_user to any existing list
shared_preload_libraries = 'set_user'
# The following lines are only required to modify the
# blocking of each respective
$> git clone https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
$> git checkout REL9_5_STABLE
$> ./configure
$> make install -s
$> cd contrib
$> git clone https://github.com/pgaudit/set_user
$> cd set_user
$> make
$> make inst
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on set_user
QUESTION
I'm learning Vue 3 with Vuex 4 and I'm stucked with something that I'm pretty sure it's simple but I can't see.
In few words, i'm trying to set some data in state
to have it available to use it in my components but it isn't working.
Let me show you the code:
/// store.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-28 at 20:16You've to dispatch that actions inside mounted hook :
QUESTION
I created an App with some components and using the redux-saga in the following component:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 17:29To me it looks like a typo, handleGetUsers
vs handleGetUser
:)
QUESTION
Few years ago I develop aps in Rails 4 and now many things change.
I user Shire GEM in this example to upload photos:
Ok, my models:
Photo model:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 13:35Never pass the user id as plaintext through the parameters. Get it from the session instead. Its trivial for any malicous user to use the web inspector and simply fill in the hidden input and then upload a unseemly picture as ANY user.
The session cookie is encrypted and much more difficult to tamper with.
QUESTION
I don't understand how getters work in Vuex. The problem is when logging out the token in state and localStorage is becoming empty, but not in getters.
In created
I call this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-13 at 10:13Getters are meant to compute derived state
based on store state
.
You are facing this problem because you are returning the value of localStorage.getItem()
from your Getter
, which is not a value of the store state
, thus it is not reactive
nor observable
.
In your example, Vuex will not recompute the value of the Getter when you call localStorage.setItem()
.
It will recompute the Getter's value only when state.user.token
is changed.
So, if you want to have the Getter working correctly, return just the value of state.user.token
.
You can also add a created
hook in your App.vue
that would check if there is a token in the localStorage and call the SET_TOKEN
mutation, if that is what you were trying to accomplish by calling localStorage.getItem
in your Getter:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-29 at 13:24Your RestTuple
conditional type is preventing the compiler from contextually inferring the callback parameter, as it would require inference to work "backwards" through the definition of RestTuple
.
Instead, I'd be inclined to make your function generic only in that tuple type T
, like this:
QUESTION
I am trying to implement Typescript and Context API together in an application. In that case I am trying to make the Context API for the login.
This is the error what I get:
Error: Rendered more hooks than during the previous render.
I am not sure what I did wrong, here is my code:
StateProvider.tsx:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-06 at 17:06LoginUseReducer
needs to be rendered like a component and not called like a function
QUESTION
I am currently trying to access my data using the Spotify API. This works very well. Thats the function I am using to get my Data. I assume the other stuff is not important. I can post that, if you need that.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-31 at 11:08since you're using typescript with react, I believe you have added the getSpotifyUser function to your interface, now if you want to access that i think you should call it like this
props.getSpotifyUser(access_token)
and finally add it to your connect as a dispatch function that's wrapping your component
your login component should be like this one
QUESTION
I'm trying to implement protected pages with Firebase authentication. I created a typical PrivateRoute component that is supposed to only show the page if they're logged in, or redirect users to a login page if they aren't logged in.
I stored the authentication status in a global state using a useEffect hook in App.js. After a lot of reading and research, I understand that the useEffect only completes after the Child component has loaded.
Having said that, I'm at a loss on how to pass authenticated from App to PrivateRoute. With my current code, the authenticated state only registers as true after PrivateRoute has pushed users to the login page. Would appreciate any help.
App.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-27 at 14:04I can't reproduce your exact problem but I think your PrivateRoute is wrong. Try something like the example bellow.
QUESTION
I'm new to ReactJS and web-dev in general. I know this questions gets asked a lot and I've tried a number of different solutions but none of them seem to have fixed my problem. I have Firebase user authentication that creates a document under a "user" collection when someone creates an account. The document ID is identical to the UID. I'm trying to get the field values stored in the document (fname, lname). I believe the problem is that currentUser.uid isn't being retrieved by the time the component renders? Sorry if I have the terminology wrong.
Test.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-22 at 19:07The error occurs because currentUser
is undefined
when this blocks is executed, so you need to wait for auth been updated.
Add auth
as dependency in useEffect
:
QUESTION
How come my catch block is not being executed when login gives an error? This is my event handler:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-22 at 00:13Your login()
function NEVER rejects the promise it returns so therefore await login()
will never go to the catch. The login()
function sometimes does return err
, but that's just a value being returned, not a rejected promise. If you want the promise that login()
returns to be rejected, then you must throw err
instead of return err
in login()
from within your catch()
block.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install set_user
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page