libubootenv | Generic library and tools to access and modify U

by sbabic C Version: v0.3.3 License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | libubootenv Summary

libubootenv is a C library typically used in Embedded System, Visual Studio Code applications. libubootenv has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

[Coverity Scan Build Status] libubootenv is a library that provides a hardware independent way to access to U-Boot environment. U-Boot has its default environment compiled board-dependently and this means that tools to access the environment are also board specific, too.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

libubootenv has a low active ecosystem.

It has 46 star(s) with 32 fork(s). There are 6 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 1 open issues and 9 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 17 days. There are 2 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of libubootenv is v0.3.3

Quality

libubootenv has no bugs reported.

Security

libubootenv has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

libubootenv does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

libubootenv releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of libubootenv

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

libubootenv Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for libubootenv.

libubootenv Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for libubootenv.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on libubootenv

Yocto Dunfell error 'No recipes available for' with multiple machines in single custom meta layer

Configuring the bootloader with `fw_env.config` and `CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET`

QUESTION

Yocto Dunfell error 'No recipes available for' with multiple machines in single custom meta layer

Asked 2021-May-09 at 14:42

I maintain a custom Yocto meta layer compatible with Dunfell. It supports a Microchip SAMA5D27 processor based board. I have several bbappend files in this layer that apply only to file from the meta-atmel and other Microchip specific packages.

Now, I want to re-use many parts of this custom meta layer and support a new processor from a different vendor. I have created my own new image recipe in my layer that does not include these bbappend files that are only relevant to Microchip.

The problem is that Yocto throws as error 'No recipes available for' regarding my bbappend files. The error seems to happen during parsing and does not consider whether I use the recipe or not in the current target.

I have searched extensively for a solution, but so far have come up empty. How can I use 1 meta-layer and maintain different bbappend files, while being able to switch MACHINE variables for different target builds? Thanks!

Bitbake Version:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-May-08 at 10:23

You cannot append to a recipe that does not exist in the first place.

If the recipes exist:

at91bootstrap_3.10.0.bb
dt-overlay-at91_git.bb
...

make sure that their layer is added to bblayers.conf.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67439753

QUESTION

Configuring the bootloader with `fw_env.config` and `CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET`

Asked 2020-Nov-25 at 14:58

I have a previously built image where the content of fw_env.config is (using u-boot):

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Nov-25 at 14:58

Thanks to the lively community support over at the yocto IRC channel I was provided with the following answer:

The two definitions (fw_env.config and CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET[_REDUND]) have to match. On top of that CONFIG_ENV_SIZE should be defined. The parameters can be configured as they represent addresses in the storage medium. Thus, they are not strictly predictated by the bsp.

Credits go to qschulz. Thanks a lot!

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65006727

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network