queue.h | Samples on using the Unix API for simple data structures
kandi X-RAY | queue.h Summary
kandi X-RAY | queue.h Summary
Samples on using the Unix API for simple data structures
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of queue.h
queue.h Key Features
queue.h Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on queue.h
QUESTION
In C++ do you need to lock a mutex before assigning to an atomic? I tried implementing the thread pool as shown here https://stackoverflow.com/a/32593825/2793618. In doing so, I created a thread safe queue and used atomics. In particular, in the shutdown
method (or in my code the waitForCompletion
) requires the thread pool loop function while loop variable to be set to true so that the thread can finish its work and join. But since atomics are thread safe, I didn't lock the mutex before assigning true to it in the shutdown method as shown below. This ended up causing a deadlock. Why is that the case?
ThreadPool.hpp:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-25 at 15:45You probably want to check m_workComplete after the wait() returns in workLoop(), otherwise you might be calling pop() on an empty queue, which is bad.
QUESTION
I'm having hard time digesting this particular code block from java.util.PriorityQueue#initElementsFromCollection method.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-23 at 09:15The constructor (or rather its author) does not trust the incoming collection. The collection’s toArray
method could violate the contract and return a shared array rather than creating a new one. This way, the caller could get hands on the internally used array of the constructed PriorityQueue
instance.
So, the constructor makes another defensive copy, except when the incoming collection is an ArrayList
exactly, i.e. not even a subclass of it. In other words, it trusts the ArrayList
’s toArray
implementation to adhere to the contract, to skip the additional copying step in this specific case. That’s why not even a subclass of ArrayList
will be accepted, as a subclass could have overridden the toArray
method.
A similar mistrust has been displayed in the default implementation of Stream.toList()
as discussed in this question and the comment section beneath that question.
The default implementation has been specified as
QUESTION
I need simple example of function mq_close in C programming language.
mq_close() closes the message queue descriptor mqdes.
On success mq_close() returns 0; on error, -1 is returned, with errno set to indicate the error.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-18 at 00:23As per the man page https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/mq_open.3.html you need to
Link with -lrt.
ie
QUESTION
When I run bundle install
on my rails 5 project, I am getting a number of errors on gems that appear to have native extensions. Here is the top of the output for one of those gems:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-17 at 22:28It turns out the problem was that in the Gemfile.lock file, it was locked to using an older version of bundler
. We simply deleted the Gemfile.lock, and re-ran bundle
to regenerate Gemfile.lock. That solved it. It now says this at the bottom of the Gemfile.lock file, so it liked this version of bundler:
QUESTION
I tried to allow decimal value in the result but however it still shows 0, what am i missing in the following codes?
I have declared the weight variable as a float value, but it won't convert as i input decimal in my graph.AddEdge(). Is there any error in my variable passing parameters?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 04:21You're using a vector
instead of using a vector
for distance
. You need to use vector
so that the elements are stored as float
as shown below:
QUESTION
I've got the following makefile
:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-20 at 12:27Your recipes are cluttered with files that don't belong there. Given the very limited amount of information you've provided, the most direct solution is to just slam out the recipes directly.
QUESTION
Essentially I have defined a class to handle my callbacks, with the declarations and definitions split between a header and source file. However I am having troubles compiling a file which then uses said callback (despite me attempted to link the object file of the callback), specifically I get a linker error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-10 at 17:25Your message types are wrong. When setting up the subscriber you're giving it a type of sdr_ros::TravelInfo
, however the callback definition takes in sdr_ros::TravelInfoConstPtr
as a parameter. Instead in your callback you want the ConstPtr generated by the message so change the signature to
QUESTION
I have a process which is using boost
message queue. When it is being blocked in either send
or receive
due to queue size limit has been reached, if I send a signal, it seemed the function call remained blocking. I expected the call to cancel or raise an exception but it didn't behave that way. How can I interrupt the send
or receive
function call ?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-04 at 00:16The way is to use the timed interfaces:
QUESTION
If my library structure is
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-03 at 21:23If Queue.h
includes LinkedList.h
, all tanslation units including Queue.h
need access to LinkedList.h
or they won't compile. (Ignoring preprocessor shenanigans here.) If you cannot get rid of the include you cannot accomplish your goal.
Depending on the uses of the contents of LinkedList.h
, you may be able to remove the include:
- If you're using only references or pointers to types defined in
LinkedList.h
, you could get away with adding forward declarations to those types toLinkedList.h
- If you're currently using types from
LinkedList.h
in ways other than reference or pointer, the pimpl idiom may allow you to get rid of this kind of usage.
If this is not an option, you may "hide away" those headers in a subdirectory with a name that indicated the headers are not meant to be included directly. I've seen private
and impl
being used.
Example:
QUESTION
I trying to write custom data structure: something close to permanent forward autofree list. Here is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-29 at 05:43When use std::priority_queue::top()
it doesn't check if size() > 0
, so std::priority_queue::top()
use dealocated memory to use shared_ptr
methods on, so cause bad things
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install queue.h
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page