azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet | IdentityModel extensions for .Net

by AzureAD C# Version: 6.31.0 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet Summary

azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet is a C# library. azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

If you noticed, we bumped the release from 5.x to 6.x We were maintaining two releases from two different branches. dev - 6.x dev5x - 5.x. Internally at Microsoft we were quickly required to remove all 3rd party libraries as IdentityModel is all about securing resources. Since there were some breaking changes, given the time-line we had to maintain two releases. Both of these branches were public and moved forward mostly in lock-step. Once we finished our SignedHttpRequest functionality in the 6.x branch, we realized the delta between 5.x aqnd 6.x was too large to maintain in both branches. We decided now was the time to switch to a single release branch. Since internally the versioning was at 6.4.2, we needed to release at 6.5.0.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 931 star(s) with 357 fork(s). There are 101 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 151 open issues and 1030 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 69 days. There are 17 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet is 6.31.0

Quality

azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet releases are available to install and integrate.

azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet saves you 364 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 871 lines of code, 0 functions and 771 files.

It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet.

azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet

Too many (recovered) exceptions in Azure App Insights

How to obtain an Azure B2C bearer token for a non-interactive/daemon application and get it validated in an Azure HTTP-triggered function

QUESTION

Too many (recovered) exceptions in Azure App Insights

Asked 2021-Aug-26 at 10:51

I have a problem: Application Insights is getting too many false positive and is sending mails on exceptions that, after investigation, cause no problem to our application

Summary, TL;DR

This is a X->Y problem. Problem Y is that AAI is logging a large number of server exceptions, see detailed explanation, and sending alerts to us. Problem X is that the JWT authentication middleware is throwing exceptions about unmatched key, but is recovering all of them swithching to a different OIDC provider. With the result that the invocation succeeds.

What can I do in order to either fix or whitelist these exceptions?

Question 2: when do exceptions get logged to AAI? Only when they are unhandled or when the logger decides to?

Context

Our application receives email data from Twilio Sendgrid via authenticated webhooks. It also allows our B2C tenant users to access the application and browse data/statistics.

B2C does not allow client credentials flow, and Sendgrid does not support scopes. In the end we ended up using two OIDC providers: Azure AD B2C for interactive users, and OpenIddict in memory to authenticate the Sendgrid service to us.

Some code ...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Aug-26 at 10:51

What can I do in order to either fix or whitelist these exceptions?

Add a telemetry filter. Based on the exception telemetry you can decide to discard the telemetry.

Question 2: when do exceptions get logged to AAI? Only when they are unhandled or when the logger decides to?

When unhandled, or when instructed to do so. For example, when an exception is logged using ILogger it will be logged to AAI as well when using the AAI ILogger (see docs)

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68935580

QUESTION

How to obtain an Azure B2C bearer token for a non-interactive/daemon application and get it validated in an Azure HTTP-triggered function

Asked 2021-Feb-26 at 14:53

There is a C# application under development that is supposed to be a part of a bigger backend application to process some data. This application is supposed to obtain a token from Azure AD B2C and send it to an HTTP-triggered function where it is supposed to be validated by the following code:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Feb-26 at 14:53

Obtaining a token for the AAD B2C tenant without UI is possible in two ways and you should probably pick one depending on what exactly you want to achieve:

user token - by using Resource Owner Password Credentials flow - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/add-ropc-policy. This flow is deprecated though and mentioned usually in legacy application context
server-side application token - by using Client Cretendial flow - this on the other hand requires using requests specific for AAD but with AAD B2C tenant - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/application-types#daemonsserver-side-applications

I'm also not quite sure why should you use id_token for that. If the application needs to authorize the request to the function with the token then it should be an access token regardless of how the token is retrieved (interactive UI or not).

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66374351

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

The scenarios supported by IdentityModel extensions for .NET are described in Scenarios. The libraries are in particular used part of ASP.NET security to validate tokens in ASP.NET Web Apps and Web APIs. To learn more about token validation, and find samples, see:.

Find more information at: