ResourceManagement | resource management application

C++ traditional (non-modules) compiler compiles .cpp files into .o files, then the linker takes .o files and links them into a binary. The exact extension of these files is not fixed (you can convince a compiler to consume .foo source files and produce .bob object files).

You may note that .h files are not mentioned here.

Header files are consumed by the C/C++ preprocessor when compiling a source file. They are textually included -- their contents are literally copued and pasted into the compiler's version of thr source file when the #include occurs.

A header file that isn't included is a text file. What more, it may not be valid to compile that test file seperately from a cpp file at all.

In other languages that don't use the textual include model, their interface declaration files can be and are compiled "stand alone". In C++ a compiler doing that is making up something that doesn't really happen.

A decent thing to do is to make stub cpp files that do nothing but include each of your header files. This ensures each of your header files in turn includes its dependencies, and should fix your intellisense problem.

It seems that your code pretty works....

just pip install xlwt

In preparation for cross-platform we extracted WCF to an isolated package Moryx.Runtime.Wcf. That also contains the container extension.

Yes. If you use this way, the siteConfig will always return null. It is by design. If you want to get the related information, you can use the following method:

A complete list can be found here

• Microsoft.Authorization/*/Delete
• Microsoft.Authorization/*/Write
• Microsoft.Authorization/elevateAccess/Action
• Microsoft.Blueprint/blueprintAssignments/write
• Microsoft.Blueprint/blueprintAssignments/delete and * for all access

According to my test, we can use ResourceManagementClient in the SDKMicrosoft.Azure.Management.ResourceManager.Fluent to list all resources in one resource group. The detailed steps are as below

1. Use Azure CLI to create a service pricipal

To fix this issue I have inserted one below line of code in startWeblogic.cmd file.

set JAVA_OPTIONS=%JAVA_OPTIONS% -Dweblogic.configuration.schemaValidationEnabled=false

You have not set the classpath correctly. As mentioned in https://stackoverflow.com/a/2396759/286934 your classpath can contain two entry types:

So, classpaths contain:

• JAR files, and
• Paths to the top of package hierarchies.

In your case you have reference ONLY the following .jar files :

• /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-12.0.2.jdk/Contents/Home
• /Applications/jade/lib/jade.jar
• /Applications/jade/lib/jadeExamples.jar

Notice that your working path /Applications/jade/src/examples/hello/ is not in the classpath. This means that your custom jade classes are not visible/accessable.

To solve your problem you have to add the additional paths you want to use in your classpaths. Usually you use the directory . to indicate that you want the "current directory" in your classpath.

Keep in mind that you have the JAR file jadeExamples.jar in your classpath. When you have a .class file for your changed HelloWorldAgent class it might not be clear which class the JVM is loading, the one from the JAR file or the .class file from the file system. Do not provide the same class with the same package in your classpath twice or even change the jadeExamples.jar file with a new changed JAR file (this might be even more confusing). Instead, create a new agent in YOUR package/namespace/directory and load it -agents foobar:your.package.and.ClassName, but ensure that the classpath is set correctly .

You shouldn't mix AZ and ARM cmdlets. I would recommend you to use the new AZ cmdlets only. If you use Managed Identity within your Azure Function, you don't even have to manually connect to your Azure Account since this is already done for you in the profile.ps1: