FuKo | 한국 공인인증서 암호변경 프로그램 - 한국 공인인증서의 암호를 변경하거나 확인해주는 프로그램입니다

by RyuaNerin C# Version: v1.0.0.1 License: Non-SPDX

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | FuKo Summary

FuKo is a C# library. FuKo has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However FuKo has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

한국 공인인증서의 암호를 변경하거나 확인해주는 프로그램입니다. 은행용 공인인증서만 테스트 해보았습니다.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

FuKo has a low active ecosystem.

It has 14 star(s) with 3 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

FuKo has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of FuKo is v1.0.0.1

Quality

FuKo has no bugs reported.

Security

FuKo has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

FuKo has a Non-SPDX License.

Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

Reuse

FuKo releases are available to install and integrate.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of FuKo

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

FuKo Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for FuKo.

FuKo Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for FuKo.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on FuKo

ORA-00904: "PSTATUSTYPE": invalid identifier 00904. 00000 - "%s: invalid identifier" *Cause: *Action: Error at Line: 67 Column: 11

case statements for different date columns

SQL taking time for execution

QUESTION

ORA-00904: "PSTATUSTYPE": invalid identifier 00904. 00000 - "%s: invalid identifier" *Cause: *Action: Error at Line: 67 Column: 11

Asked 2018-May-31 at 06:22

When I try to run the below SQL:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-May-31 at 06:22

"it's a parameter."

Your posted SQL is mangled so this is not a working example (for instance you have a cross join with no join conditions so it will return a Cartesian product). Anyway it shows you the sort of thing you need to do:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50617006

QUESTION

case statements for different date columns

Asked 2018-May-30 at 17:34

I'm facing issues while writing the below code in SQL developer:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-May-30 at 17:34

You can't put other conditions inside the case expression clauses.

You could either switch to simpler Boolean logic:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50610373

QUESTION

SQL taking time for execution

Asked 2018-May-09 at 06:36

Select pinv.pipeline_ref_id  Invoice_No,
 pinv.orig_company_id Company,
 pinv.orig_terminal_id Terminal,
 phwb.pipeline_ref_id HWB_No,
 ih.transport_mode Trans_Mode,
 ih.import_export_ind Business_Type,
 to_date(ms.accounting_date,'dd/mm/yy') BL_Confirm_date,
to_date(sf_get_local(pinv.pipeline_tx_status_date,pinv.status_date_tz_code),'dd/mm/yy') Inv_Void_Date,
 (pinv.pipeline_tx_status_date - ms.accounting_date) BL_Days, ih.billto_name BillTo_Name, ppi.partner_id BillTo_ID,
pinv.last_modified_by Executed_By, ih.oc_invoice_amt Invoice_Amount

From pipeline pinv

JOIN invoice_header ih ON pinv.pipeline_tx_id = ih.pipeline_tx_id
JOIN pipeline_relations prin ON pinv.pipeline_tx_id = prin.pipeline_tx_id 
JOIN pipeline phwb ON prin.rel_pipeline_tx_id = phwb.pipeline_tx_id
JOIN multisegment_status ms ON phwb.pipeline_tx_id = ms.pipeline_tx_id
JOIN pipeline_parties ppi ON ppi.partner_role = 'BT'
Where
(TRUNC(sf_get_local(pinv.pipeline_tx_status_date,pinv.status_date_tz_code)) between to_date('&1','DD-MON-YYYY:HH24:MI:SS') AND to_date('&2','DD-MON-YYYY:HH24:MI:SS'))

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-May-09 at 06:36

how exactly it is working

sf_get_local() is a function in your application, not an Oracle built-in, so you can look at its source to figure out what it does and we can't. However, I would guess it's converting a timestamp in UTC into a local timezone. The trunc() removes the time element, so 2018-05-08 15:20:01.542 would become just 2018-05-08, which seems a bit odd given the operands are expressed in date time formats to the second.

As for why "SQL is taking hours" it's hard for us to tell. Performance diagnosis requires a lot more detail. An explain plan would help. Find out more.

Obvious things to look at:

The WHERE clause probably doesn't use an index (unless you have a function-based index on pipeline(trunc(sf_get_local(pipeline_tx_status_date,status_date_tz_code)). The problem is you're filtering on a date range so it's hard for the optimizer to tell when using an index is a good thing. If the range is an hour and you are scanning five years' worth of data then an index is helpful. But not if the range spans a year and you have five years worth of data.

You're looking at an hour of data so maybe you'll get some benefit from building that function based index. Find out more.

This join is actually a CROSS JOIN:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50246248

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install FuKo

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: