May | An option type for .Net -
kandi X-RAY | May Summary
kandi X-RAY | May Summary
An option type for .Net
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of May
May Key Features
May Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on May
QUESTION
I have been trying to learn about functional programming, but I still struggle with thinking like a functional programmer. One such hangup is how one would implement index-heavy operations which rely strongly on loops/order-of-execution.
For example, consider the following Java code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-07 at 21:17This is not an index-heavy operation, in fact you can do this with a one-liner with scanl1 :: (a -> a -> a) -> [a] -> [a]
:
QUESTION
In earlier versions, we had Startup.cs class and we get configuration object as follows in the Startup file.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-26 at 12:26WebApplicationBuilder
returned by WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args)
exposes Configuration
and Environment
properties:
QUESTION
I have an array of positive integers. For example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-27 at 22:44This problem has a fun O(n) solution.
If you draw a graph of cumulative sum vs index, then:
The average value in the subarray between any two indexes is the slope of the line between those points on the graph.
The first highest-average-prefix will end at the point that makes the highest angle from 0. The next highest-average-prefix must then have a smaller average, and it will end at the point that makes the highest angle from the first ending. Continuing to the end of the array, we find that...
These segments of highest average are exactly the segments in the upper convex hull of the cumulative sum graph.
Find these segments using the monotone chain algorithm. Since the points are already sorted, it takes O(n) time.
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-25 at 09:59- Download Microsoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net45 from nuget.org
- Open the package as zip
- copy the files from
build\.NETFramework\v4.5\
toC:\Program Files (x86)\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework\.NETFramework\v4.5
For more details: Building a project that target .NET Framework 4.5 in Visual Studio 2022
QUESTION
Just today, whenever I run terraform apply
, I see an error something like this: Can't configure a value for "lifecycle_rule": its value will be decided automatically based on the result of applying this configuration.
It was working yesterday.
Following is the command I run: terraform init && terraform apply
Following is the list of initialized provider plugins:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-15 at 13:49Terraform AWS Provider is upgraded to version 4.0.0 which is published on 10 February 2022.
Major changes in the release include:
- Version 4.0.0 of the AWS Provider introduces significant changes to the aws_s3_bucket resource.
- Version 4.0.0 of the AWS Provider will be the last major version to support EC2-Classic resources as AWS plans to fully retire EC2-Classic Networking. See the AWS News Blog for additional details.
- Version 4.0.0 and 4.x.x versions of the AWS Provider will be the last versions compatible with Terraform 0.12-0.15.
The reason for this change by Terraform is as follows: To help distribute the management of S3 bucket settings via independent resources, various arguments and attributes in the aws_s3_bucket
resource have become read-only. Configurations dependent on these arguments should be updated to use the corresponding aws_s3_bucket_*
resource. Once updated, new aws_s3_bucket_*
resources should be imported into Terraform state.
So, I updated my code accordingly by following the guide here: Terraform AWS Provider Version 4 Upgrade Guide | S3 Bucket Refactor
The new working code looks like this:
QUESTION
I am building a Gatsby site. I upgraded Node.js to v17.0.1, and when I run a build, there is an error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-04 at 23:33Gatsby must be using an algorithm or key size which is no longer allowed by default with OpenSSL 3.0.
UPDATE ⚠️This is most likely a webpack issue - https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/14532
They have since released a fix in version 5.61.0 - https://github.com/webpack/webpack/releases/tag/v5.61.0 - so upgrading webpack should address the issue as well
A member of the webpack team has stated they do not plan to backport the fix to webpack 4, so if you are on webpack 4 you may need to look to upgrading to webpack 5 first.
From Node.js 17's announcement post:
If you hit an
ERR_OSSL_EVP_UNSUPPORTED
error in your application with Node.js 17, it’s likely that your application or a module you’re using is attempting to use an algorithm or key size which is no longer allowed by default with OpenSSL 3.0. A new command-line option,--openssl-legacy-provider
, has been added to revert to the legacy provider as a temporary workaround for these tightened restrictions.
Running this on the terminal might look like:
QUESTION
Given a string S of length N, return a string that is the result of replacing each '?'
in the string S with an 'a'
or a 'b'
character and does not contain three identical consecutive letters (in other words, neither 'aaa'
not 'bbb'
may occur in the processed string).
Examples:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-24 at 13:55I quickly tried out the solution I proposed in the comments:
QUESTION
I have a vector of random positive integers. I would like to select only those elements of the vector whose sum will be exactly equal to a certain predetermined value.
Let's take an example like this.
x=1:5
, I am looking for elements whose sum is equal to 14
. The solution is of course the vector c(2, 3, 4, 5)
.
Of course, there may be several solutions.
Example 2.
x=1:5
, I'm looking for elements whose sum is equal to 7
.
Here, of course, should be the following three solutions:
1.c(2, 5)
,
2.c(3, 4)
,
3.c(1, 2, 4)
.
There may also be a situation where there will be no solutions at all.
Example 3.
x=c(1, 2, 7)
, I'm looking for elements whose sum equals 5
.
Of course, there are no correct solutions here.
Everything seems trivially simple if we have vectors of several elements. Here, I even came up with a few alternative solutions. However, the problem becomes when the size of the vector increases.
My vector looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-17 at 22:02This task sounds like a 1 dimensional bin packing problem or knapsack problem, in which case there are many resources available online to help guide you.
One potential solution is to use the gbp package, e.g.
QUESTION
In short:
I have implemented a simple (multi-key) hash table with buckets (containing several elements) that exactly fit a cacheline. Inserting into a cacheline bucket is very simple, and the critical part of the main loop.
I have implemented three versions that produce the same outcome and should behave the same.
The mystery
However, I'm seeing wild performance differences by a surprisingly large factor 3, despite all versions having the exact same cacheline access pattern and resulting in identical hash table data.
The best implementation insert_ok
suffers around a factor 3 slow down compared to insert_bad
& insert_alt
on my CPU (i7-7700HQ).
One variant insert_bad is a simple modification of insert_ok
that adds an extra unnecessary linear search within the cacheline to find the position to write to (which it already knows) and does not suffer this x3 slow down.
The exact same executable shows insert_ok
a factor 1.6 faster compared to insert_bad
& insert_alt
on other CPUs (AMD 5950X (Zen 3), Intel i7-11800H (Tiger Lake)).
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-25 at 22:53The TLDR is that loads which miss all levels of the TLB (and so require a page walk) and which are separated by address unknown stores can't execute in parallel, i.e., the loads are serialized and the memory level parallelism (MLP) factor is capped at 1. Effectively, the stores fence the loads, much as lfence
would.
The slow version of your insert function results in this scenario, while the other two don't (the store address is known). For large region sizes the memory access pattern dominates, and the performance is almost directly related to the MLP: the fast versions can overlap load misses and get an MLP of about 3, resulting in a 3x speedup (and the narrower reproduction case we discuss below can show more than a 10x difference on Skylake).
The underlying reason seems to be that the Skylake processor tries to maintain page-table coherence, which is not required by the specification but can work around bugs in software.
The DetailsFor those who are interested, we'll dig into the details of what's going on.
I could reproduce the problem immediately on my Skylake i7-6700HQ machine, and by stripping out extraneous parts we can reduce the original hash insert benchmark to this simple loop, which exhibits the same issue:
QUESTION
I am aware that Let's Encrypt made changes that may impact older clients because a root certificate would expire. See DST Root CA X3 Expiration (September 2021).
However, I didn't think this could impact me because my development machine is up-to-date.
But since today I get the message while doing a git pull
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-17 at 13:39I was facing a similar issue with DevOps build agents. But I can access the DevOps server web interface without any issue.
To solve this,
- I updated my Let's Encrypt client (I'm using Certify The Web)
- I have renewed my certificate
After that, the DevOps agent is able to do a Git pull.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install May
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page