JWTS | Json Web Token Secure | Authentication library
kandi X-RAY | JWTS Summary
kandi X-RAY | JWTS Summary
If you have landed here, so you are already interested in taking your application’s security to its next level and most probably you are already a loyal consumer of the “Json Web Token” as known as JWT. This article will introduce you to a brand new approach regarding the usage of JWT, which is the combination of the two very famous security mechanisms JWT and TOTP for the first time in their digital lives.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of JWTS
JWTS Key Features
JWTS Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 22
License : No License
Copyvar jwt = require('jsonwebtoken');
var token = jwt.sign({ foo: 'bar' }, 'shhhhh');
// sign with RSA SHA256
var privateKey = fs.readFileSync('private.key');
var token = jwt.sign({ foo: 'bar' }, privateKey, { algorithm: 'RS256' });
jwt.sign({ foo: public String createToken(Authentication authentication, Boolean rememberMe) {
String authorities = authentication.getAuthorities().stream()
.map(GrantedAuthority::getAuthority)
.collect(Collectors.joining(","));
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on JWTS
QUESTION
I recently performed a rather large update to this web app, and for the most part it went off without a hitch... Until the app tries to send an SMS notification from staging/production.
The upgrade from laravel 7.x to 8.x was quite simple and straightforward. At the same time we also installed Laravel Horizon. Everything went according to plan, and all works fine locally.
When we deploy to staging/production however, queued SMS notifications fail with the following exception:
ReflectionException: Class Http\Adapter\Guzzle6\Client does not exist in /home/forge/dev.example.com/releases/20210609194554/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Container/Container.php:836
Looking in the stack trace we can see that Nexmo is the culprit:
#5 /home/forge/dev.example.com/releases/20210609194554/vendor/nexmo/laravel/src/NexmoServiceProvider.php(150): Illuminate\Foundation\Application->make()
However in our composer.json file we are requiring Guzzle 7 with the following:
"guzzlehttp/guzzle": "^7.3",
It is worth mentioning again at this point, I have no issues sending SMS locally, the main difference between local and staging environments is that locally I use Laravel Valet and Staging uses Laravel Envoyer.
What I've tried so far:
- Changing
"guzzlehttp/guzzle": "^7.3"to"guzzlehttp/guzzle": "^6.5|^7.3" - Running
php artisan horizon:purgeandphp artisan horizon:terminateboth manually and in a deployment hook. - Restarting the laravel horizon daemon on forge.
- trying
php artisan queue:restart - running
composer dump-autoloadandcomposer dump-autoload -o - deleting composer.lock and the vendor/ directory from current/ then running
composer install - Restarting PHP, Nginx, and eventually the entire server :(
and more...
Any help is greatly appreciated
UPDATE Below:
Complete composer.json:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 23:40I see that the NexmoServiceProvider is trying to use the defined http_client in the config, so can you share what the .env has for NEXMO_HTTP_CLIENT ? I am pretty sure you have something wrong there or even not defined.
And this is what it is defined in the config/nexmo.php related to that config:
QUESTION
I have a Google VM running my dockerized application and i also have my Firebase front end application.
I want my Firebase application to trigger my microservice. The thing is, i want to be security conscious and i want the Firebase app to be the only actor who can trigger the microservice.
What is the best option for such a task? The only thing i have found are json web tokens (jwts). Is this good enough for the job? Is there something better?
If jwts are what is needed, then what is the logic that the code should have? Should the server create a key and send it to the microservice, then the microservice should decode it and only if it matches a value it should proceed with the job?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 18:51firebaser here
The new Firebase App Check feature was made for this sort of thing, but how to access such app tokens from your own server-side code isn't decided yet.
So App Check currently allows specific Firebase services to only allow traffic from apps that are registered in the project. You are looking for the other side of that: only allow traffic from those apps to your services, which is not supported yet.
Also see https://groups.google.com/g/firebase-talk/c/rU0fEozdMyc/m/AYUa6PpLCAAJ
QUESTION
When I get some claims from a JWT Token to validate user authentication I get the following error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-18 at 22:23What you are decoding isn't the token, you're trying to decode the entire header value. Bearer isn't part of the token, it's the authentication scheme.
More generally, you're writing your own security infrastructure, which is almost always a very bad idea. Spring Security JWT handles all of this for you automatically; use it instead.
QUESTION
Hi Im trying to use JWT in Spring boot
My code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 21:01for me worked just this way
QUESTION
I'm using OpenID Connect to control access to my REST API. One of the things I need to do when servicing a request is get the OIDC UserInfo based on the access token in request's Authorization: Bearer ... header.
To this point I've been working with JWTs and this works fine. I'm looking at expanding this to work with opaque tokens as well.
My strategy has been based on my understanding of the OpenID Connect Discovery spec, section 4:
- Extract the
issfrom the access token. - Discover the userinfo endpoint by getting
${iss}/.well-known/openid-configurationand querying the JSON foruserinfo_endpoint. - HTTP GET the
userinfo_endpoint, passing the access token as anAuthorization: Bearer ...header.
This works fine for opaque tokens... except for step 1. Currently, I have to know who the issuer is via an out-of-band mechanism because I don't know how to get the issuer from the opaque token (which, to be honest, makes sense given that it's opaque). I see a few possibilities:
- Maybe I'm just supposed to know who issued it and my question is misguided.
- Maybe the best thing to do is try a list of known issuers and see if one of them works.
- Maybe there's a mechanism for discovering the issuer of the opaque token. (The spec refers to WebFinger, but that doesn't seem like it fits my use case.)
- Maybe there's something I haven't considered...
Thanks all for any help.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-27 at 17:32The standard mechanism for dealing with opaque tokens is via introspection. Also the preferred option is for there to only be a single type of access token - issued by your Authorization Server (AS), which sits alongside your APIs.
The introspection result can be a claims payload or a JWT. It is common to plug in an API gateway, as in this article, so that the gateway makes the actual introspection call. The gateway should then cache results for subsequent calls made with the same access token.
An opaque token is typically a GUID or something similar, and the issuer value is not stored in the token - it is instead stored in the issuing Authorization Server's back end state. The only way to determine the issuer is to try to introspect the token.
FOREIGN ACCESS TOKENS
Aim to avoid using foreign access tokens in your APIs as in the following examples. This can make it difficult to control data added to tokens and token lifetimes:
- User signs in with Google - then API uses Google access tokens
- User signs in with Microsoft - then API uses Microsoft access tokens
It is preferred instead to use 'federated login capabilities' of your Authorization Server, leading to the following cleaner result, and fewer issues:
- User signs in with Google - then API uses your AS access tokens
- User signs in with Microsoft - then API uses your AS access tokens
QUESTION
I'd like to make people who hold the JWT can access all APIs but people can only access on EXCLUDE PATH now. what should I set up for that?
This is my WebConfig.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 05:52You should use WebSecurity instead of interceptors.
Something like this for configuring which paths can be accessed and which cannot
QUESTION
I'm new to Springboot and i hope you can help me. I'm doing a back application in SpringBoot for a react native app and i'm stuck. I want to secure my app with a jwt but when i try to launch my application i have this message andi don't understand why i got this.
...
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 15:14In which package is your application class? (annotated with @SpringBootApplication)?
Spring boot will normally only search for @Component in the same package or any of its sub-packages.
QUESTION
i want to create a JWT in a scala application for talking to the Apple's AppStore Connect api. i'm following the guide here
i'm getting an invalid signature on jwt.io when creating a JWT with the below code. a request to appstore connect results in a 401
i can verify that the JWT encodes the header and payload correctly on http://jwt.io
looking at this library, i think i'm selecting the correct curve algorithm:
After creating the token, one must sign it with an Apple-provided private key, using the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) with the P-256 curve and the SHA-256 hash algorithm, or ES256.
i'm not sure what is wrong - maybe i'm not generating the S value correctly?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 12:23I can suggest two things to try out:
JwtBuilder signWith(SignatureAlgorithm var1, Key var2)is deprecated. Can you try usingJwtBuilder signWith(Key var1, SignatureAlgorithm var2), and see if that succeeds?- If not, you can try using bountycastle , which does work for me. Following is the code snippet for getting the private key.
QUESTION
I'm trying to debug my application, but debugger not hitting this code block. Here is my custom gateway filter.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-10 at 15:48Hey i was manage to solve this problem by creating a RouteLocator @Bean like below. Now when i make a request in debugger mode i can hit the apply method in AuthorizationHeaderFilter
QUESTION
I've built a REST API in Spring Boot which works perfectly when ran from main and tested with Postman. Now I'm going about implementing automated tests for the controllers using JUnit 5, for these tests I don't want to mock dependencies, I want to use the actual repositories, interact with a real test (h2) database etc so I'm trying to load the full application context using the @SpringBootTest annotation. Here is the first test file as it stands.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-08 at 17:28I guess the problem is about application.properties. Spring tries to find it in test resources folder but fails. Try to add one
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install JWTS
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
