Identity | NET Core Identity is the membership system | Identity Management library

The indexing operation doesn't have an identity element. The domain and range of indexing is not necessarily the same -- the domain is arrays and objects, but the range is any type of object, since array elements and object properties can hold any type. If you have an array of integers, the domain is Array, while the range is Integer, so it's not possible for there to be an identity. a[x] will always be an integer, which can never be equal to the array itself.

And even if you have an array of arrays, there's no reason to expect any of the elements to be a reference to the array itself. It's possible to create self-referential arrays like this, but most are not. And even if it is, the self-reference could be in any index, so there's no unique identity value.

I think you might be slightly overcomplicating things. Ideally, you'd just want a single key drawing method for the whole layer. However, because you're using a Stat to do the majority of calculations, this becomes hairy to implement. In my answer, I'm avoiding this.

Let's say I'd want to use a geom-only implementation of such a layer. I can make the following (simplified) class/constructor pair. Below, I haven't bothered width_scale or height_scale parameters, just for simplicity.

Imo, it's a bug in Paramiko. It does not handle correctly absence of server-sig-algs extension on the server side.

Try disabling rsa-sha2-* on Paramiko side altogether:

Try the code below (given m <- diag(5))

Such data types are called "Higher-Kinded Data" (HKD). Manipulating them is often done with Generics or Template Haskell.

There are libraries like higgledy which provide built-in functionality for HKD. I believe construct is the function you are looking for:

• On Linux, it's important that any bash deployment scripts that get run have Unix line endings (LF) and not Windows line endings (CRLF).

• Kuduscript will generate scripts with platform-appropriate line endings, but if those scripts are modified, or if you provide your own custom deployment scripts, it's important to make sure that your editor doesn't change the line endings.

• If something seems off with your deployment script, you can always use the Kudu console to delete the contents of /home/site/deployments/tools.

• This is the directory where Kudu caches kuduscript-generated deployment scripts. On the next deployment, the script will be regenerated.

• The error you're currently seeing is a Kudu issue with running node/npm for deployments.

• The easiest and fastest resolution for what you are currently seeing is to specify engines.node in your package.json.

Error: EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, open '/home/site/wwwroot/wwwroot/Identity/lib/bootstrap/LICENSE'

EISDIR stands for "Error, Is Directory". This means that NPM is trying to do something to a file but it is a directory. In your case, NPM is trying to "read" a file which is a directory. Since the operation cannot be done the error is thrown.

Three things to make sure here

1. Make sure the file exists. If it does not, you need to create it. (If NPM depends on any specific information in the file, you will need to have that information there).
2. Make sure it is in fact a file and not a directory.
3. It has the right permissions. You can change the file to have all permissions with "sudo chmod 777 FILE_NAME".

Note: You are giving Read, Write and Execute permissions to every one on that file.

This issue is caused by Azure CLI version 2.30.0 which seemed to be rolled out MS hosted agents recently.

Hence I adapted all my Python scripts running on (MS and self) hosted agents to this model:

The problem here is related to inlining. I do not understand it completly, but here is what I understand.

First we find that copy&pasting the definition of replicateM into the Submission 1 yields the same bad performance as Submission 2 (submission). However if we replace the INLINABLE pragma of replicateM with a NOINLINE pragma things work again (submission).

The INLINABLE pragma on replicateM is different from an INLINE pragma, the latter leading to more inlining than the former. Specifically here if we define replicateM in the same file Haskells heuristic for inlining decides to inline, but with replicateM from base it decides against inlining in this case even in the presence of the INLINABLE pragma.

sequenceA and traverse on the other hand both have INLINE pragmas leading to inlining. Taking a hint from the above experiment we can define a non-inlinable sequenceA and indead this makes Solution 2 work (submission).