Autofac.Extras.Moq | Moq auto mocking integration for Autofac IoC | Dependency Injection library
kandi X-RAY | Autofac.Extras.Moq Summary
kandi X-RAY | Autofac.Extras.Moq Summary
Moq auto mocking integration for Autofac IoC. Please file issues and pull requests for this package in this repository rather than in the Autofac core repo.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Autofac.Extras.Moq
Autofac.Extras.Moq Key Features
Autofac.Extras.Moq Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Autofac.Extras.Moq
QUESTION
I'm in the process of upgrading our Autofac.Extras.Moq library to the latest version (6.0.0) within our Unit Test project. After upgrading, I noticed tests using: var mock = AutoMock.GetLoose()
, no longer supported the "Provide" method. So I started digging into the documentation for some sort of workaround.
After taking a look at the Getting Started docs (https://autofaccn.readthedocs.io/en/v5.2.0/integration/moq.html#getting-started) I've noticed there is a new way of registering mocks and dependent services using AutoMock.GetLoose(cfg => cfg.RegisterMock(mockA))
. However, some of our tests require more than one Mock injected, and it's not clear to me how to do this.
Take for example:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-23 at 14:15Have you tried putting both registrations in the GetLoose
lambda?
QUESTION
Consider the following class:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-25 at 21:59only constructor injection is supported by Autofac.Extras.Moq
Actually you are right, but the AutoMock.GetLoose
has an overload in which you can inject to the mock a fully functioned IContainer
by passing a delegate of ContainerBuilder
with all the regular autofac features:
QUESTION
I'm using Flurl Http to make http requests. In the unit tests, I'm trying to verify that the expected content was passed to the sender. I'm trying it like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-16 at 17:37In most cases (see edit below), Flurl has captured it, you just have to access it differently.
In your example, w.Request
is a "raw" HttpRequestMessage, from the HttpClient
stack, that Flurl exposes so you can get under the hood if you need to. HttpRequestMessage.Content
is a read-once, forward-only stream that has already been read and disposed by the time you're accessing it.
To assert the captured string body, you would typically just do this instead:
QUESTION
Following my question about conditional-dependency-resolver-on-run-time
I built a BooService
that has a injected array of IFooService[]
, And a FooFactory
method that return one of the foo services based on a given key on run time.
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-05 at 04:56_mock.Mock()
QUESTION
I'm on .NET 4.6.2 and using the following versions of the assemblies via Nuget:
Service
Autofac - 4.8.1
Autofac.Extras.AggregateService - 4.1.0
Autofac.Wcf - 4.1.0
Castle.Core - 4.3.1
Tests
Autofac.Extras.Moq - 4.3.0
Moq - 4.10.1
The setup I'm using for the host container is exactly like the "Getting Started" example from the Docs and you end up with a proxy generated from DynamicProxy
, and this works well by eliminating the constructor overloads.
When it comes to unit testing the services that use this type of injection I seem to be stumbling on how to mock it out properly.
I've spent a few hours trying various approaches and none of them have panned out. Here's basically what I have:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-30 at 23:51"How do I properly mock an aggregate service, and provide behaviors for it during unit testing?"
Try to do smth like this (it is not using automoq just a moq :))
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Autofac.Extras.Moq
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page