AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios | broken patterns in ASP.NET Core applications

by davidfowl C# Version: Current License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios Summary

AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios is a C# library. AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

# ASP.NET Core Diagnostic Scenarios. The goal of this repository is to show problematic application patterns for ASP.NET Core applications and a walk through on how to solve those issues. It shall serve as a collection of knowledge from real life application issues our customers have encountered.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 6471 star(s) with 626 fork(s). There are 448 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 23 open issues and 16 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 55 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios is current.

Quality

AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios saves you 25 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 70 lines of code, 0 functions and 22 files.

It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios.

AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios

To use Task.WhenAll, or not to use Task.WhenAll

Process stream data using producer-consumers with 1 synchronous producer

Assigning result of async method to a variable

QUESTION

To use Task.WhenAll, or not to use Task.WhenAll

Asked 2021-May-14 at 11:58

I am reviewing some code and trying to come up with a technical reason why you should or should not use Task.WhenAll(Tasks[]) for essentially making Http calls in parallel. The Http calls call a different microservice and I guess one of the calls may or may not take some time to execute... (I guess I am not really interested in that). I'm using BenchmarkDotNet to give me an idea of there is any more memory consumed, or if execution time is wildly different. Here is an over-simplified example of the Benchmarks:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-May-12 at 15:51

My question really is, is there a technical reason why you should or not use Task.WhenAll()?

The behavior is just slightly different in the case of exceptions when both calls fail. If they're awaited one at a time, the second failure will never be observed; the exception from the first failure is propagated immediately. If using Task.WhenAll, both failures are observed; one exception is propagated after both tasks fail.

Is it just a preference?

It's mostly just preference. I tend to prefer WhenAll because the code is more explicit, but I don't have a problem with awaiting one at a time.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67506865

QUESTION

Process stream data using producer-consumers with 1 synchronous producer

Asked 2020-Jan-03 at 21:49

I have an application with the following workflow.

Users upload row-based json file(each line is a record) using minio
Then they send the application request to process it.

The application then starts downloading data as a stream using this method with the following signature

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Jan-03 at 21:49

As @Hans Passant pointed out in the comments, there is a BlockingCollection which solves the problem.

It has a limit of items inside and when the limit is reached, it blocks the producer until the number of items decreases.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59571022

QUESTION

Assigning result of async method to a variable

Asked 2018-Dec-17 at 10:52

I'm looking at the "good" example in this scenario, specifically assigning the result of an async method to a variable. (In this case it's a discard variable but it works the same if I just do var x =).

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Dec-17 at 10:52

With the _ keyword its assigning the output of DoAsyncPing() to _ as a Task. In that case there is no execution yet its just a task.

Without the _= then the function is called and the compiler is warning you that the call is not awaited. So the first method is assignment and the second is execution

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53813344

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: