shed | .NET runtime inspector | Reverse Engineering library

In a project, I have a C-API which uses C-style function pointers as callbacks. In one of those callbacks, I need to access a private function of an object Foo. Note that the API-call is done within a function of my class. Because of not shown code, I have a handle to my object as a void* accessible to me.

Things aside that the construct is prone to errors, by passing a lambda as callback I am able to access the private function of my object. This is somewhat unexpected but welcome to me. I haven't found anything regarding this behavior, so I would kindly ask if somebody could shed some light why this is actual working. I am not aware that the lambda is catching something, but it appears that is has something to do with the actual scoping. I am using C++17 and gcc 10.2.

Here's a sample block of code:

I am curious why this XSLT :

Got this:

Got this command: cd /some/dir; /usr/local/bin/git log --diff-filter=A --follow --format=%aI -- /some/dir/file | tail -1

I want to get the output from it.

Tried this:

my $proc2 = run 'cd', $dirname, ';', '/usr/local/bin/git', 'log', '--diff-filter=A', '--follow', '--format=%aI', '--', $output_file, '|', 'tail', '-1', :out, :err;

Nothing output.

Tried this:

my $proc2 = run , $dirname, , $output_file, <| tail -1>, :out, :err;

Git throws an error:

fatal: --follow requires exactly one pathspec

The same git command runs fine when run directly from the command line.

I've confirmed both $dirname and $output_file are correct.

git log --help didn't shed any light on this for me. Command runs fine straight from command line.

UPDATE: So if I take off the | tail -1 bit, I get output from the command in raku (a date). I also discovered if I take the pipe out when running on the command line, the output gets piped into more. I'm not knowledgeable enough about bash and how it might interact with raku's run command to know for sure what's going on.

I've read a few books on Haskell but haven't coded in it all that much, and I'm a little confused as to what Haskell is doing in a certain case. Let's say I'm using getLine so the user can push a key to continue, but I don't really want to interpret that person's input in any meaningful way. I believe this is a valid way of doing this:

I have a dockerfile that currently only installs pip-tools

I am sorry but I am really confused and leery now, so I am resorting to SO to get some clarity.

I am running Android Studio Bumblebee and saw a notification about a major new release wit the following text:

I'm completely new to trying to implement GitLab's CI/CD pipelines, but it's been going quite well. In fact, for my ASP.NET project, if I specify a Publish Profile in the msbuild command that uses Web Deploy, it actually deploys the code successfully to the web server.

However, I'm now wanting to have the "build" job create artifacts which are uploaded to GitLab that I can then subsequently deploy. We're using a self-hosted instance of GitLab, for which I'm not an admin, but I can speak to the admin if I know what I'm asking for!

So I've configured my gitlab-ci.yml file like this:

I stumbled over the following piece of code. The "DerivedFoo" case produces different results on MSVC than on clang or gcc. Namely, clang 13 and gcc 11.2 call the copy constructor of Foo while MSVC v19.29 calls the templated constructor. I am using C++17.

Considering the non-derived case ("Foo") where all compilers agree to call the templated constructor, I think that this is a bug in clang and gcc and that MSVC is correct? Or am I interpreting things wrong and clang/gcc are correct? Can anyone shed some light on what might be going on?

Code (https://godbolt.org/z/bbjasrraj):