uREPL | In-game powerful REPL environment for Unity3D

by hecomi C# Version: v0.7.0 License: Non-SPDX

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | uREPL Summary

uREPL is a C# library typically used in Programming Style, Unity applications. uREPL has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However uREPL has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

uREPL is an in-game powerful REPL environment for Unity3D that supports following functions:.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

uREPL has a low active ecosystem.

It has 427 star(s) with 44 fork(s). There are 30 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 5 open issues and 17 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 113 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of uREPL is v0.7.0

Quality

uREPL has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

uREPL has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

uREPL code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

uREPL has a Non-SPDX License.

Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

Reuse

uREPL releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

uREPL saves you 535 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 1254 lines of code, 0 functions and 46 files.

It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of uREPL

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

uREPL Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for uREPL.

uREPL Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for uREPL.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on uREPL

kafka with multiple zookeeper config

QUESTION

kafka with multiple zookeeper config

Asked 2018-Aug-21 at 18:52

A bit confused about clustering setup:

Zookeeper could be setup as a cluster by configuring myid (1,2,3...) in the file and having for example zookeeper1:2888:3888, zookeeper2:2889:3889 in the zoo.cfg file
For Kafka, in the server.properties file, is it must to specify the full list of zookeeper server for parameter zookeeper.connect, or just 1 is enough? Is there any differences? I've seen practices of specifying the full list of zookeeper server even when creating a topic, e.g. /opt/kafka/bin/kafka-topics.sh --create --zookeeper x.x.x.x:2181,x.x.x.x:2181,x.x.x.x:2181 --replication-factor 1 --partitions 1 --topic sample_test

---Production and DR setup (large latency is expected between production and dr)---

Let's say, having 1 Kafka (kafka1) and 1 zookeeper server (zookeeper1) in production, 1 kafka (kafka2) and 1 zookeeper server (zookeeper2) in DR, and form those 2 zookeepers into a cluster;
running uReplicator to replicate data in production to DR; from uReplicator example, it seems the configuration is like: kafka1 (in production) is connecting to "zookeeper1:2181/cluster1", and kafka2 (in DR) is connecting to "zookeeper1:2181/cluster2", what's the meaning of "/cluster1", "/cluster2"? what's the right config for this scenario, what's the idea of having kafka2 in DR connects to zookeeper1 in prod?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Aug-21 at 18:52

is it must to specify the full list of zookeeper server for parameter zookeeper.connect

It is good practice to put at least 3 or 5. If you only put one, and that goes down, Kafka will likely not work as expected, or fail out.

in DR, and form those 2 zookeepers into a cluster

It's not generally encouraged to share Zookeepers clusters between Kafka clusters, as Kafka puts a reasonable amount of load on Zookeeper for high volume Kafka clusters.

Though, as you point out

connecting to "zookeeper1:2181/cluster1", and kafka2 (in DR) is connecting to "zookeeper1:2181/cluster2", what's the meaning of "/cluster1", "/cluster2"?

This is called a Chroot in Zookeeper. Think of it like a directory, or namespace for each unique Kafka cluster within the Zookeeper cluster.

what's the idea of having kafka2 in DR connects to zookeeper1 in prod?

Well, you wouldn't. If Kafka2 has its own unique topic data that is not being replicated to Kafka1, then pointing at the Zookeeper data that says those topics existed on Kafka2, but not Kafka1 will only result in confusion and error.

Also, I am unaware of how uReplicator works other than MirrorMaker, but you'll also want to prepare a DR strategy for Zookeeper, not only Kafka

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51940453

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install uREPL

Please download the latest uREPL.unitypackage from the [release page](https://github.com/hecomi/uREPL/releases).

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: