RestClient | A facade for HttpClient | REST library

try this

1. As you have implied, those systems that show no gap at the beginning of the moving average do so by using data prior to the data displayed as part of the moving average calculation. You can accomplish the same thing by setting kwarg xlim=(min,max) in your call to mpf.plot() by setting min equal to one less than your largest moving average, and max=len(data) ... so for example given your code above, do:

Posted community wiki answer based on the topic with similar issue on the GitHub. Feel free to expand it.

The solution is to add /run/desktop/mnt/host before the /c/users///gits/resttest:

The HTTP response contains this line:

Maven is a tool that has certain opinions on where things should go; a default configuration. You don't have to follow it, but not following this default configuration has three significant downsides:

• You do have to then configure maven to tell it about the alternative choices you made. Maven does not make this easy.
• Other java programmers generally assume the defaults. If you have a good reason to deviate, go for it, but 'I do not like it' is not a good reason, as it'll be pointlessly increasing the learning curve.
• The maven developers chose this structure as default for a reason. If you think it's a dumb reason, that's certainly possible and you may even be right, but then you're using a build tool written by folks who, (judging the book by its cover a little bit), according to you, make boneheaded choices about sane defaults. That's not a great place to be.

To explain each layer:

Indicates that these are source files: Compiled and generated stuff should not be in here, and the entire src tree should be in version control. Contrast to e.g. bin or build containing build artefacts, doc containing documentation, and who knows what other directories you need for other relevant parts of a repo.

A project can consist of multiple separately buildable artefacts and 'kinds' of product. For example, most projects include a bunch of code that exists solely for testing purposes (the unit tests). They live in src/test. The core product lives in main. You can also have for example separate sources for an installer perhaps (src/installer), or a build plugin, or an annotation processor that needs to be built first and then it needs to be on classpath when compiling the main project, etcetera.

There's such a thing as split language projects, where some of it is written in language A and some of it in language B. For its worth, I think this layer is bad design; A file ending in .java gives away how one is to 'compile it', and this goes for just about every source file that needs a compiler applied to it: The extension says just as much as a folder name of java ever could. To show you a common contrast: Many projects have src/main/resources as well as src/main/java: Resources are 'compiled' simply by copying them over: Imagine your app has a text file containing a list of all US states with all zipcodes used in each state. Or png files with icon images for a GUI app. Such files are just as much part of your main application as the class files would be and should end up in the same place (inside the jar file), but to 'compile' them, you just.. copy em, you don't run javac to do this. That's what this level is about: What tool should be used to turn source files into distributable aspects?

This matches the java package structure. This is effectively a requirement applied by javac itself. The reason to use such a deeply nested package structure is simply because packages serve as namespaces: If there is a conflicting fully qualified name, all hell breaks loose: Java simply cannot handle this. Hence, java programmers ensure that such conflicts never happen by using a 'reverse domain name' structure: You'd stick your project in that package if you own the zeus.lab.co domain, thus ensuring nobody except other folks in your team who share control of that server could possibly be in conflict (and for those: They're in your team, talk to them to avoid conflict). For example, there are 3 different open source java projects all called spark. Had they all gone with package spark; (and thus, src/main/java/spark/Main.java as an example file), then for every java project you'd pick one of the 3: The other 2 you can never use in this project. Harsh, and pointless, which is why (almost) all java libraries use a reversed domain name as root package name, and then maven follows this package name in its directory structure because javac makes life extremely difficult if you don't do that.

That gets us to project_name/src/main/java.

You made that up for hyperbole. Nobody hosts a proj on zeus.lab.co.bah.org. But if they do: Talk to the management that decided to assign that whopper of a domain name to a team. It's on them, not on the author of this project.

If I see it correctly, you assert that the stream is completed:

You need to invoke a terminal operation, or use the value and continue the chain.

If you want to invoke a terminal operator you can invoke the await operation to make your code blocking and wait for the response.

If you want to merge this reactive invocation with another that is present in your client code, you can join or combine your actual Mutiny stream with the on coming from the response by using the combine method.

If you just want to use the value and do not retrieve it, you can suscribe and get the result.

If you have a multi you can call directly the method toList

Assuming that you want to have some timeouts involved and you want to get the actual Integer, you can go with the await method and a timeout.

You may need to enforce the TLS version something like this

There is a general principle for OO languages to be "lazy" and defer decisions to as late as possible. We'll use that principle to refactor your code to make the token automatically refresh itself on expiration, and/or fetch itself if it has not already done so.

There is also a group of principles known collectively as SOLID. We'll use those principles also.

The final principle I'll reference is "smaller is better", with respect to methods and modules. Combine that with the "S" (Single Responsibility) from SOLID, and you'll see the refactor contains a lot more, but much smaller methods.

Principles aside, it's not clear from the problem statement that the token is short-lived (lasts only for a "session") or long-lived (eg: lasts longer than a single session).

If the token is long-lived, then storing it into a file is okay, if the only processes using it are on the same system.

If multiple web servers will be using this code, then unless each one is to have its own token, the token should be shared across all of the systems using a data store of some kind, like Redis, MySQL, or Postgres.

Since your code is using a file, we'll assume that multiple processes on the same system might be sharing the token.

Given these principles and assumptions, here is a refactoring of your code, using a file to store the token, using "lazy" deferred, modular logic.