machine.specifications | Specification framework for .NET that removes language noise

by machine C# Version: v1.1.1 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | machine.specifications Summary

machine.specifications is a C# library. machine.specifications has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

MSpec is called a "context/specification" test framework because of the "grammar" that is used in describing and coding the tests or "specs". The grammar reads roughly like this. When the system is in such a state, and a certain action occurs, it should do such-and-such or be in some end state. You should be able to see the components of the traditional Arrange-Act-Assert model in there. To support readability and remove as much "noise" as possible, MSpec eschews the traditional attribute-on-method model of test construction. Instead it uses custom delegates that you assign anonymous methods, and asks you to name them following a certain convention.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

machine.specifications has a medium active ecosystem.

It has 864 star(s) with 182 fork(s). There are 46 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 26 open issues and 291 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 592 days. There are 3 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of machine.specifications is v1.1.1

Quality

machine.specifications has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

machine.specifications has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

machine.specifications code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

machine.specifications is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

machine.specifications releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of machine.specifications

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

machine.specifications Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for machine.specifications.

machine.specifications Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for machine.specifications.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on machine.specifications

BeforeScenario and AfterScenario hooks not working in specflow

Why does my Rx.NET observable appear to produce its entire sequence twice?

Can't get OpenCover to work in fake

Nuget package that has no dependents

QUESTION

BeforeScenario and AfterScenario hooks not working in specflow

Asked 2019-Dec-31 at 11:46

I have the following code in my SeleniumSteps.cs code I am trying to get the AfterScenario to fire on debugging these tests

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Dec-31 at 11:46

First, as Sandesh noted in his answer, you are missing [Binding] attribute for your SeleniumSteps subclass. It's not enough to have [Binding] only in base class, you must apply it to every class where are your hook methods or step definitions (bindings), because that is the way how specflow is searching for hooks and bindings under the hood. It is like scope identifier. If you miss to place [Binding] attribute to class, specflow will not search for potential hook methods or bindings in that class. Link on documentation: https://specflow.org/documentation/Hooks/

This link can be useful also. Check answer given by RunOfTheShipe: Specflow test step inheritance causes "Ambiguous step definitions"

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59542346

QUESTION

Why does my Rx.NET observable appear to produce its entire sequence twice?

Asked 2018-Mar-29 at 07:09

I have a randomly failing unit test which I'm at a loss to explain. This involves an observable sequence using Rx.NET and an extension method that I made to transform the sequence. First, let me show how the test fails:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Mar-22 at 17:04

EDIT:

Here's a way to mock the problem up in LinqPad, without using the MSpec/NChrunch (?) runner:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49416593

QUESTION

Can't get OpenCover to work in fake

Asked 2017-May-16 at 14:21

EDITED to show the ignore return as pointed out by Fyodor and the resulting error

I have a .fsx file with several targets that work as expected, but I can't get a target for OpenCover to work. This is what I have for the Target code:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-May-16 at 14:21

After a lot of playing around an googling, I finally came up with the solution. The basic problem was that I didn't open the OpenCoverHelper. I made the assumption that it was included in FAKE as it is in the Api and there was no documentation saying anything else. So, here is the code I use:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43955000

QUESTION

Nuget package that has no dependents

Asked 2017-Mar-14 at 05:40

I am using mspec (machine specification) unit test framework for .NET project.

I used nuget to get all required packages.

There is a specific package, that is not part of the code. It is the "Console" application for the mspec that I used to run my unit tests from outside VS, from the command line. (It is located here): When I use Nuget to install it, Nuget doesn't add it to the normal "packages.config" file inside of the Test project. It is adding it to a "packages.config" folder that exists in ".nuget" folder.

But when my colleague open the project and build, his VS doesn't get that package.

How to change that, to force VS to get the package automatically?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Mar-14 at 05:40

Nuget doesn't add it to the normal "packages.config" file inside of the Test project. It is adding it to a "packages.config" folder that exists in ".nuget" folder.

That is because you are using NuGet 2.7 or later and have a solution that is still configured by old package restore method "MSBuild-integrated restore". This will cause builds to fail with an error stating that you have not given consent to restore packages. Visual Studio will skip automatic package restore.

How to change that, to force VS to get the package automatically?

To resolve this question, you can follow below steps:

Close Visual Studio to avoid file potential file locks and conflicts.
If using TFS: a. Remove nuget.exe and nuget.targets from the solution's .nuget folder and remove those files from the solution workspace. a. Retain nuget.config with the disableSourceControlIntegration setting as explained in Omitting packages with Team Foundation Version Control.
If not using TFS: a. Remove the .nuget folder from the solution and the solution workspace.
Edit each project file in the solution, remove the element, and remove any references to the nuget.targets file. For more detail information, you can refer to Migrating to automatic restore.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42764570

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install machine.specifications

Create a .NET Framework or .NET Core library project.
Install Nuget packages as follows:
Install the test SDK and Visual Studio runner:
Optionally, install the assert and mocking libraries: