Single-Responsibility-Principle | Sample implementation of Single Responsibility Principle

by medalinouira C# Version: Current License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets(1)Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | Single-Responsibility-Principle Summary

Single-Responsibility-Principle is a C# library. Single-Responsibility-Principle has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Sample implementation of Single Responsibility Principle.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

Single-Responsibility-Principle has a low active ecosystem.

It has 4 star(s) with 1 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

Single-Responsibility-Principle has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of Single-Responsibility-Principle is current.

Quality

Single-Responsibility-Principle has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

Single-Responsibility-Principle has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

Single-Responsibility-Principle code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

Single-Responsibility-Principle does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

Single-Responsibility-Principle releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Single-Responsibility-Principle

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

Single-Responsibility-Principle Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for Single-Responsibility-Principle.

Single-Responsibility-Principle Examples and Code Snippets

Explanation

Java

Lines of Code : 72

License : No License

Copy

public interface Troll {
  void attack();
  int getAttackPower();
  void fleeBattle();
}

@Slf4j
public class SimpleTroll implements Troll {

  @Override
  public void attack() {
    LOGGER.info("The troll tries to grab you!");
  }

  @Override
  pub

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on Single-Responsibility-Principle

How to initialize a factory?

how to split classes correctly(OOP)?

How to avoid repeating a parameter in every controller?

MVVM Validation in UWP

QUESTION

How to initialize a factory?

Asked 2019-Apr-23 at 00:47

I have a factory to build cars... it a basic factory, it accepts name of a car, looks for all classes that implement ICar, chooses the correct type based on car name and initializes the car using reflection.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Oct-29 at 07:10

It is better to inject dependencies (constructor, property, method) into your types. And it is best to avoid creating dependencies using new-operator.

To make it even better you should define an interface for you CarFactory (ICarFactory) and change your service to depend on that type.

In tests you could mock ICarFactory and provide special implementations for your test cases.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53040265

QUESTION

how to split classes correctly(OOP)?

Asked 2018-Aug-17 at 16:04

Well i have got an Class that reads a Excel-file as template.

The class converts the Excel File to a Java Object
Adds Information to the template
rewrites the Template with the added Informations

i was reading some stuff about the single-responsibility-principle and decided that i need to refactor my class, because its doing more than one thing.

iam just not sure if iam doing to much here ?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Aug-17 at 11:08

From a first glance, this looks quite good to me.

The point is to have a meaningful amount of "responsibility" within a class/method. Just by reading the name of the class, and looking at the public methods it should be clear what that class can do for you, and how you interact with the class to actually get to these results.

Beyond that, methods should do something that is easy to test with unit tests.

Taking all the above ideas into account: yes, this looks good.

Where: I assume that your public static utility methods are used in more than one class, only then they should go into a distinct class. The only thing worth thinking about: do all the methods and classes need to be pubic? An external user of the overall solution (invoking it from a different package), does that client code really need all these public methods? Meaning: only make public what external client code is supposed to be using!

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51893901

QUESTION

How to avoid repeating a parameter in every controller?

Asked 2017-Jul-28 at 23:16

I am wondering whether there is a way to avoid repeating myself in passing Request.Headers into every service method?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Jul-28 at 23:16

One possibility would be to create a service to extract the current Request.

If hosting it in IIS, then the ASP pipeline stores the Web API message object on the current HttpContext.

Once that exists, you can access it via

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45339916

QUESTION

MVVM Validation in UWP

Asked 2017-Apr-09 at 00:11

In the last week I've been trying to apply MVVM Pattern to Universal Windows Plataform, in the most elegant possible way, that means apply SOLID principles and some popular design patterns.

I've been trying to reproduce this exercise from this link: http://www.sullinger.us/blog/2014/7/4/custom-object-validation-in-winrt

Also the link is for Windows 8 apps it also applies to Windows 10 apps according to MSDN answer at this forum: https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsapps/en-US/05690519-1937-4e3b-aa12-c6ca89e57266/uwp-what-is-the-recommended-approach-for-data-validation-in-uwp-windows-10?forum=wpdevelop

Let me show you my classes, this is my view my final view:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Apr-09 at 00:11

Ok Finally I was able to make this code work, it has some fixes but I was able to understand it and also solve it on my own, before I publish my answer because i have two answers for this problem, I'll like to apologize to the community, I didnt want to ask for help so that you could do it for me, it wasnt my intention, if it looked like that, I'm sorry, i'll try to sound less needy.

Well down to the solution:

the main issue of the code I've published is in the abstract method Validate, since you gotta write your own validation for each field and also this is where you control the adding and removal of error messages, so I wrote a Validate Method like this one:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43268648

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install Single-Responsibility-Principle

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: