ApiSecurity | Helpers for building secure APIs with ASP.NET Core

by nbarbettini C# Version: v1.0 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets(2)Community Discussions(6)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | ApiSecurity Summary

ApiSecurity is a C# library. ApiSecurity has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Helpers for building secure APIs with ASP.NET Core

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

ApiSecurity has a low active ecosystem.

It has 14 star(s) with 7 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

ApiSecurity has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of ApiSecurity is v1.0

Quality

ApiSecurity has no bugs reported.

Security

ApiSecurity has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

ApiSecurity is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

ApiSecurity releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ApiSecurity

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

ApiSecurity Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for ApiSecurity.

ApiSecurity Examples and Code Snippets

API security extensions,Usage,Aborting insecure connections

Lines of Code : 7

License : Permissive (MIT)

Copy

public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env)
{
    app.AbortIfNotHttps();

    if (env.IsDevelopment())
    // The rest of your pipeline...
}

API security extensions,Usage,Returning an HTTP status code for insecure requests

Lines of Code : 4

License : Permissive (MIT)

Copy

[RequireHttpsOrClose]
public class HomeController

[RequireHttpsOrClose(505)]
public class HomeController

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on ApiSecurity

Binance API error. ImportError: No module named binance.client

Can two authentication systems co-exist in ASP.NET Core Web API?

nestjsx/crud + TypeORM: patch and post results in empty request

spring security work only for highest priority order

log4j is creating log with manual.log, manual.log.1 so on

Header-based authentication for REST API in Phoenix

QUESTION

Binance API error. ImportError: No module named binance.client

Asked 2021-May-02 at 08:55

I have imported the Binance package. I don't understand why it is not working. Can someone please point out what is wrong? This is my first time using an API and importing the necessary files.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-May-02 at 08:55

Are you sure that you've installed package python-binance ?

If not try this pip install python-binance

For more securable and comfortable method is virtual environment. You should look at https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/venv.html

Setting Up Virtual Environment

open the command-line
cd
python -m venv env
source env/bin/activate (Linux or MacOS) or .\env\Scripts\activate (Windows)
install dependencies (in your case) pip install python-binance
save the dependencies pip freeze > requirements.txt
run your code! 🎉

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67354102

QUESTION

Can two authentication systems co-exist in ASP.NET Core Web API?

Asked 2021-Feb-08 at 13:42

I have an ASP.NET Core project that receives data from Sendgrid Webhook and provides authenticated APIs to business users (Azure AD).

Sendgrid is capable to be configured with OAuth 2.0 with client-credentials-flow as authentication to the webhook receiver. It doesn't support basic authentication. OAuth or none.

I had successfully configured Sendgrid's OAuth authentication to my app, leveraging OpenIddict, leaving other APIs unprotected for a while. Now I need to protect these other APIs using OAuth implicit flow before going live to production. And Sendgrid must authenticate itself to the webhook. I prefer not to deploy an additional microservice.

Question in short

Is it possible, and how, in ASP.NET Core to validate a JWT from different issuers? Examples are those application where you can login either using Facebook or Twitter or Google etc. (see note 1)

Now, to be perfectly clear to external audience, I'll be adding a ~~detailed~~ boring explanation.

My work so far

This is what I did to configure OpenIddict.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Feb-08 at 13:42

I probably found a decent workaround. Thanks to the answer to Use multiple JWT Bearer Authentication https://stackoverflow.com/a/49706390/471213

What I have done was to promote MSAL to JWT Bearer Default authentication, so that every API is by default authenticated with AAD token.

Instead, on the Sendgrid Webhook API, I used [Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = OpenIddictValidationAspNetCoreDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)] to explicitly tell ASP .NET Core that I want to use that OpenIddict scheme for that API only.

Result:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66100386

QUESTION

nestjsx/crud + TypeORM: patch and post results in empty request

Asked 2020-May-03 at 18:25

I'm trying to get into nestjs by creating a simple REST Api with TypeORM and the crud library. So far I have created a working role based authentication, but I'm running into a strange problem. I used the crud library to create a simple controller for the User entity. The GET-requests are working without any problems. But I can't POST to create a new user, neither can I use PATCH to update one. I think it might just be a very stupid mistake by me, but as I did not write much code, I can't find any differences to the examples in the doc.

When I try to patch a property, it just responds me with the original user object, no changes made (It's like I send an empty request). When I try to post a new user, the response is the following error message:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-May-03 at 18:25

As it turned out, it was the validation. Crud already has validation activated and I had this in the main.ts:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61520059

QUESTION

spring security work only for highest priority order

Asked 2019-May-14 at 21:06

I am trying to integrate spring mvc in existing spring rest project. Security for spring rest is working fine. When I tried to implement security for spring mvc with least priority order then it will only worked for rest api. If I have set priority order for spring mvc high then it will work for spring mvc but for rest api it will redirect to login page.

Here is my code snippet

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-May-14 at 21:05

Each WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter basically configures one SecurityFilterChain which by default will process all HTTP requests.

When there are multiple SecurityFilterChain , it will check each SecurityFilterChain one by one in priority order and the first that can process the request will be used.

As both SecurityFilterChain are configured to process all HTTP requests , the SecurityFilterChain with the higher priority order are always be used.

So simply change the SecurityFilterChain for the API to have a higher priority and configure it to process the URL start with the API endpoint :

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56137201

QUESTION

log4j is creating log with manual.log, manual.log.1 so on

Asked 2017-Jul-10 at 10:07

My log4j properties as follows,

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Jul-10 at 10:07

Appenders type needs to be changed from RollingFileAppender to FileAppender. So after changing it, your log4j.properties would look like:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44965087

QUESTION

Header-based authentication for REST API in Phoenix

Asked 2017-Apr-08 at 11:37

I'm implementing a rest api in Elixir. An api-key is passed to each request to authenticate a user. In a plug I have this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Apr-08 at 11:37

If the key is invalid or not present, you'd normally send the error message with a proper error status code and then call Plug.Conn.halt/1, which will stop this request from going further through the plug pipeline. If they key is valid, you'd probably want to assign some value to the conn, (e.g. user_id) which the rest of your application can use.

For example:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43293517

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network