cs-script | C # scripting platform | Script Programming library
kandi X-RAY | cs-script Summary
kandi X-RAY | cs-script Summary
C# scripting platform
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of cs-script
cs-script Key Features
cs-script Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on cs-script
QUESTION
I want to carry out a customized aggregation through mapping a certain field in ES doc.
I try to leverage terms aggregation script. There're hundreds of mappings so that I have to put all of them into a HashMap:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-14 at 22:23tldr you could try runtime fields if you had them, but chances are they will also not be fast. that's the unfortunate nature of scripting in Elasticsearch at this point
your best bet would be what ExplodZe says above, and do that work prior during the ingestion process, to make query time faster
QUESTION
I have a set of packages that I reuse throughout my personal projects using a similar structure.
For production purposes, they are written in TypeScript, and compiled into JavaScript via tsc
before they are published to npm so I can install them in my other projects. I also run tests on them using Jasmine.
In development, I use Webpack with its ts-loader
to compile the TypeScript in a way that lets my use it in example scripts running in a browser. I also typically use Webpack in my projects where I consume these packages, though as they were compiled before being published those projects will see them as JavaScript only and won't need to use ts-loader
.
I use ES module syntax everywhere so I can comfortably use the same syntax in each context instead of worrying about switching between CommonJS for Node and ES module syntax for browsers. To allow this in Jasmine, in my jasmine.json
configuration file I've set "jsLoader": "import"
.
I am having an issue around how to write my import
statements. In particular, how to specify file extensions in a way that will work for each use case that comes up when I'm developing these packages.
TypeScript's Node module resolution makes some useful assumptions around file extensions:
TypeScript will mimic the Node.js run-time resolution strategy in order to locate definition files for modules at compile-time. To accomplish this, TypeScript overlays the TypeScript source file extensions (.ts, .tsx, and .d.ts) over Node’s resolution logic.
This means if I use code such as import { foo } from './foo';
then TypeScript will understand to look for a file called foo.ts
.
Similarly, Webpack's resolve
configuration object allows a set of file extensions to be specified in the extensions
property to tell Webpack how to try to resolve an import with no file extension. So with my configuration of extensions: ['.js', '.ts']
it will find the same foo.ts
file as TypeScript.
However, when I attempt to run my tests in Jasmine using import
without a file extension, it's unable to resolve.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-07 at 00:11Thanks to amosq's reply to my answer to a related question, I now have an answer to this question.
Jasmine was a bit of a red herring here, the real relevance there was only the ES Module resolution it was trying to do with my setup. The core of the issue was the Webpack's module resolution is unable to reproduce the functionality of TypeScript's module resolution rules, where it treats *.js
paths as potentially pointing to *.ts
files.
Thanks to amosq's comment, I've been able to resolve this by using a Webpack resolver plugin: resolve-typescript-plugin
Its instructions only show how to use it in a CommonJS syntax, though as I mentioned in my question I'm using ES Module syntax everywhere I can. To use it in my Webpack config I've done this:
QUESTION
There is a list of conversations and every conversation has a list of messages. Every message has different fields and an action
field. We need to consider that in the first messages of the conversation there is used the action A
, after a few messages there is used action A.1
and after a while A.1.1
and so on (there is a list of chatbot intents).
Grouping the messages actions of a conversation will be something like: A > A > A > A.1 > A > A.1 > A.1.1 ...
Problem:
I need to create a report using ElasticSearch that will return the actions group
of every conversation; next, I need to group the similar actions groups
adding a count; in the end will result in a Map
as 'A > A.1 > A > A.1 > A.1.1', 3
.
Constructing the actions group
I need to eliminate every group of duplicates; Instead of A > A > A > A.1 > A > A.1 > A.1.1
I need to have A > A.1 > A > A.1 > A.1.1
.
Steps I started to do:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-12 at 15:37Using script in Terms aggregation we can create buckets on first character of "context.action". Using similar terms sub aggregation we can get all the "context.action" under parent bucket ex A-> A.1->A.1.1 ...
Query:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install cs-script
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page