ShouldBe | unit test C # that integrates with existing NUnit tools
kandi X-RAY | ShouldBe Summary
kandi X-RAY | ShouldBe Summary
A cleaner *faster* way to unit test C# that integrates with existing NUnit tools like ReSharper.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ShouldBe
ShouldBe Key Features
ShouldBe Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ShouldBe
QUESTION
I have a CRUD functionality that works perfectly, what I need to do is to enable adding menu items with the CRUD function.
The new item, created with CRUD, shouldbe diplayed here: Image example
I have tried to find solution in the following question: Xamarin Forms Dynamically add shell items, and many others.. But these articles DO NOT answer my question.
As mentionned I understand your logic but I cannot implement it to my project.. AND I am quite new in this so I'll share some code and hope that someone can help.
This is my AppShell.xaml
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-13 at 09:41About your CRUD operation,you could call Items.Add()
method and Items.Remove()
method before you operator the database.
like in add the menuitem in AddUrl.xaml.cs:
QUESTION
I have a very simply project.
build.sbt:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-11 at 10:41The best practice is to place application.conf
into src/main/resources/
for regular use and into src/test/resources/
for testing. You'll have 2 conf files with different values in test. If you don't need to change config for test you can simply keep one conf file in main
.
You don't have to override the file explicitly with -Dconfig.resource
or -Dconfig.file
for your tests because loading resources from class path will work as you expect out of the box and your test config will be used. -D
option is mostly used at runtime to provide external configuration or in some complex build scenarios.
If you use -Dconfig.resource
or -Dconfig.file
pay attention to the path. config.resource
is just a filename, i.e. application.conf
which will be loaded as resource while config.file
is an absolute or relative file path.
If you are making a library you can get fancy with reference.conf
file having default values and application.conf
overriding them. This could also work in your scenario but would be more confusing because that's not the purpose or reference file.
For the purposes of testing just use 2 application.conf
files.
Additionally, here are some options to override config at runtime:
Overriding multiple config values in Typesafe config when using an uberjar to deploy.
Overriding configuration with environment variables in typesafe config
Scala environment ${USER} in application.conf
More info here: https://github.com/lightbend/config#standard-behavior
QUESTION
I want to unit-test a function that returns a complex nested data structure, but I'm only interested in certain fields of that structure. For example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-02 at 15:43A simple approach:
QUESTION
I wrote this function
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-19 at 10:50I changed hackage regex-pcre-builtin to light-pcre. And it works !
I haved to encode my strings into ut8 bytestring then add utf8 compile-time flag
QUESTION
I'm toying around with a small ktor webapp where I want to split functionality in multiple modules. I have a root module where I install the features I want to use throughout the whole application
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-18 at 07:55Yes, this is a proper way to test an application because modules don't depend on each other and are bound via configuration. Also, instead of adding one more extension method for Application
, you can introduce the following helper function just for testing:
QUESTION
I was trying to find an anonymous type from a collection of assemblies by AssemblyQualifiedName, but though the anonymous type is present in the scanned assembly it's not found. GetTypes() seems to return types with other AssemblyQualifiedNames.
Why are the AssemblyQualifiedNames different, and what can I do to find the correct type in the given assemblies?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-04 at 15:37The problem is that code like
QUESTION
I'm using the following regex to only replace lines that are not empty (lines with whitespaces do not count as empty).
^(.+)$
with the multiline option.
According to regex101 this should work: https://regex101.com/r/S5Fcqw/1
But it seems that C#s implementation of regex is a bit different. Can I make this work with replace or do I need to look at match?
This is the call: Regex.Replace(text, @"^(.+)$", " $1", RegexOptions.Multiline);
Language is C# 7.2 and net472 as target framework.
So I have now found the offending combination:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-26 at 15:06So the fix was to not rely on $
to match the newline but to do it manually.
I use now: @"([^\r\n]+\r?\n?)"
with RegexOptions.SingleLine
(not sure if necessary) and it works fine for my use-cases.
QUESTION
I currently have this configuration for JaCoCo in my pom.xml:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-23 at 15:50JaCoCo analyzes .class
files, not source files. The Scala compiler may produce multiple .class
files from a single source file. Your SayHello.scala
class most likely contains a companion object
. An object
is always compiled to a class of the same name with $
at the end, which implements the companion object singleton at the bytecode level. If you go to your target/classes
directory, you'll most likely see those two files there - SayHello.class
and SayHello$.class
.
Two records in the JaCoCo report correspond to those two class files. The dot at the end instead of a $
is most likely a jacoco report rendering issue.
To skip the companion object class from analyzing, just add it to your exclusion list:
QUESTION
I want to create some tests with varying values, using hspec. I wrote the following code which does not compile but give an idea of what I am aiming at:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-06 at 22:50Assuming you're getting the error:
QUESTION
I have to implement compareRationals as something like
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-07 at 19:19I think this is all you need.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ShouldBe
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page