xWrap | Sitecore strongly-typed wrapper framework

by vhil C# Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets(2)Community Discussions(5)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | xWrap Summary

xWrap is a C# library. xWrap has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Strongly-typed wrapping framework for Sitecore CMS. xWrap is a small and light-weigh library created to improve the developer workflow when building Sitecore solutions.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

xWrap has a low active ecosystem.

It has 4 star(s) with 0 fork(s). There are 4 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

xWrap has no issues reported. There are 3 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of xWrap is current.

Quality

xWrap has no bugs reported.

Security

xWrap has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

xWrap is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

xWrap releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of xWrap

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

xWrap Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for xWrap.

xWrap Examples and Code Snippets

XWrap a wrapper function to wrap the provided function

javascript

Lines of Code : 3

License : Permissive (MIT License)

Copy

function XWrap(fn) {
    this.f = fn;
  }

XWrap the wrapped function to wrap a function

javascript

Lines of Code : 3

License : Permissive (MIT License)

Copy

function XWrap(fn) {
  this.f = fn;
}

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on xWrap

Allowing JavaScript closure to inherit variables from the parent's scope

R.cond Cannot read property 'length' of undefined

How to forward (well-known) symbols in a type wrapper (mapped type)?

Am I using the wrong Ramda function, R.reduce doesn't appear to be working

Typescript wrapping function with generic type

QUESTION

Allowing JavaScript closure to inherit variables from the parent's scope

Asked 2020-Feb-13 at 23:12

I am able to pass a variable from the parents scope to an anonymous function as follows:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Mar-09 at 23:25

You can already access variables from the enclosing scope:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49203624

QUESTION

R.cond Cannot read property 'length' of undefined

Asked 2019-Jul-22 at 14:42

  const getStats = response => R.reduce(
    R.cond([
      (accum, val) => isCompleted(val), someIrrelevantFn,
      (accum, val) => isOngoing(val), someOtherIrrelevantFn
    ]),
    { planned: R.path(['data', 'length'], response), ongoing: 0, completed: 0 },
    response.data
  )

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jul-22 at 14:42

It looks like you're calling cond incorrectly. The input is an array of arrays, the inner ones looking like [testFn, consequentFn].

I think this would fix it:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57146717

QUESTION

How to forward (well-known) symbols in a type wrapper (mapped type)?

Asked 2019-Jul-18 at 19:32

Following the documentation on mapped types, it should be possible to have a wrapper like this in TypeScript:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jul-18 at 19:32

The problem is that well-known symbols are not included as part of keyof, and thus you can't map over them. That issue is confusingly marked as "fixed" but I think that's a mistake or misleading; its also marked as "fix available" which is true: this pull request should address the problem if it ever gets merged. The activity here looks recent enough (June 2019) that there's some reasonable chance of seeing it in the language in the not-too-distant future, but you might want to go over to those issues and give them or describe your use cases if you think they are particularly compelling.

I don't have a great workaround for you since it's currently hard to detect these well-known symbol keys. If you do any special-casing it will probably have to be of the types that have these symbols as keys, and not of the keys themselves. Oh well. EDIT: @NailAchmedzhanov's answer looks like a plausible workaround to me.

Anyway, hope that helps; good luck!

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57100616

QUESTION

Am I using the wrong Ramda function, R.reduce doesn't appear to be working

Asked 2019-Feb-28 at 19:37

Given an initial message string (which in effect is acting like a format string), and contains place holders that are subsequently to be populated.

For example our initial message is:

"GREETINGS-{year}-{mm-month}-{dd-day} - HELLO WORLD"

where there are 3 place holders, {year}, {mm-month}, {dd-day}

and I'd like to translate this into:

"GREETINGS-2016-06-23 - HELLO WORLD"

Given that we have an array of objects as follows:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Feb-28 at 16:35

You're very close, you just transposed the two arguments in your reducer function. Instead of this:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54929984

QUESTION

Typescript wrapping function with generic type

Asked 2018-Nov-05 at 14:24

How can I wrap a function without changing its generic type in Typescript?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Nov-05 at 14:24

The wrapper function is expected to take in a function and return a function of the exact same type signature.

Typescript has no way of knowing how many arguments the passed function takes or what it returns and your function implicitly assumes that it takes 0 arguments (except this) and returns void.

There isn't a nice way to save function signatures in typescript at the moment. However there is a new proposal for later versions that may fix this: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/5453

For now you can make a generic wrapper that looks something like this.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45020874

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install xWrap

This section covers the basic framework functionality.
Wrapping fields
Wrapping items
View rendering with strongly-typed fields
View rendering with strongly-typed datasource
View rendering with strongly-typed datasource and rendering parameters
Controller rendering with strongly-typed fields
Controller rendering with strongly-typed datasource
Controller rendering with strongly-typed datasource and rendering parameters

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: