WFN | Windows Firewall Notifier extends the default Windows | Firewall library
kandi X-RAY | WFN Summary
kandi X-RAY | WFN Summary
WFN started as a hobby around 2010 and is an "extension" to the embedded Windows firewall, offering real time connections monitoring, connections map, bandwidth usage monitoring... Its main feature being the Notifier alert itself, which tells you about outgoing connections attempts and allows you to allow or block them, either permanently or temporarily. It has been made open source a few years ago. Please read the documentation about the features and limitation of WFN.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of WFN
WFN Key Features
WFN Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on WFN
QUESTION
Am basically pretty new to creating custom excel formula's. I have the following custom excel formula:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-19 at 08:00You're not referencing your cells properly. Range K77:P77
is an object so must be Set
.
As you've written it I think (without Option Explicit
) it will treat K77 as a variable and P77 as an undefined function (at least that's the errors I got).
The function assumes the ranges are on the same sheet as the function is entered.
QUESTION
my neural network is split into 2 files, the class and the one that actually creates/runs it
I believe the problem lays in the class file.
The purpose of the NN is to be an OR gate ([1, 1] = 1, [1, 0] = 1, [0, 1] = 1, [0, 0] = 0)
while [1, 1],[1, 0], and [0, 1] output 1 (as they should) [0, 0] outputs .5 when I would expect something much lower
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-05 at 22:18Basic logic gates can be a pain on ass on NN.
I did not spot amnything wrong in your code, but by the nature of your problem and what you describe, I will bet the problem is in the training data. When you have a disbalance between the positives and negatives in a data, an NN can be biased towards the positive cases and generate false-posivtives. If your training data have equal numbers of each input, your negative cases are 25%.
There are two ways to correct this, one is changing your training set, putting more cases of [0,0] OR you can give more emphasis to the false-positive error, like multipling this error by an constant before use it to adjust the nodes weights.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install WFN
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page