bridge | handy CloneHero library management tool

In my opinion, the CORE_VM_DOCKER_HOSTCONFIG_NETWORKMODE setting seems to be wrong.
you can check docker-compose.yaml or core.yaml

• I will explain fabric-samples/test-network as targeting according to your current situation.
• You can check in CORE_VM_DOCKER_HOSTCONFIG_NETWORKMODE in docker-compose.yaml
• Perhaps in your case(fabric-samples/test-network), the value of ${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME} was not set properly, so it was set to _test.
• Make sure the value is set correctly and change it to your network name.

You are using scalatest version 2.2.6:

A reasonable solution is an enum with associated values because the type can be determined by the productype key. The init method first decodes the productype with a CodingKey then in a switch it decodes (from a singleValueContainer) and associates the proper type/value to the corresponding case.

The first thing to know about jQuery .clone() is that it creates new DOM elements from some existing ones.

That implies the same rules as any other dynamically created elements:

• Do not use ids
• Delegate event handlers

Additionnally, the cloned set of elements cannot be appended multiple places... So, to use it as a templating trick, you have to clone twice. Once on page load (to save them before any change occurs) and once again when appending somewhere.

I fixed it by myself. The management interface itself was missing a route to the VLAN2 net. Works now :)

help(f) displays:

I know that generic type information is stripped prior to final compilation

This is not quite true, as erasure is a part of the compilation process itself, not something that happens prior to compilation. i.e. erasure is not a transformation that happens on source code.

As such, there is no way (that I know of) to programmatically get a transformed version of the source code, but we can figure out what happens for simple examples like this by following the rules in JLS 4.6:

Type erasure is a mapping from types (possibly including parameterized types and type variables) to types (that are never parameterized types or type variables). We write |T| for the erasure of type T. The erasure mapping is defined as follows:

• The erasure of a parameterized type (§4.5) G is |G|.

• The erasure of a nested type T.C is |T|.C.

• The erasure of an array type T[] is |T|[].

• The erasure of a type variable (§4.4) is the erasure of its leftmost bound.

• The erasure of every other type is the type itself.

Type erasure also maps the signature (§8.4.2) of a constructor or method to a signature that has no parameterized types or type variables. The erasure of a constructor or method signature s is a signature consisting of the same name as s and the erasures of all the formal parameter types given in s.

The return type of a method (§8.4.5) and the type parameters of a generic method or constructor (§8.4.4, §8.8.4) also undergo erasure if the method or constructor's signature is erased.

The erasure of the signature of a generic method has no type parameters.

For your code snippet we get (ignoring trivial erasures):

I'm not familiar with Memory Mapped File but if the two process share same memory, I believe it has same physical address, if this is true then you could probably use Cheat Engine with kernel mode.

Just keep in mind that it can cause system instability or crash so make sure to save all your works before proceeding. You can follow this steps:

1. First open one of the program, make sure that "shared memory" is created before proceeding into the next step.
2. Open Cheat Engine, make sure to enable kernel mode for OpenProcess in Settings -> Extra and enable kernel debugger in Settings -> Debugger Options (otherwise you won't be able to observe the instructions that access the memory)
3. Open the process in Cheat Engine, select the program that you launched in the first step
4. Now scan the memory inside cheat engine, since you mentioned that you able to view the memory, take out some chunk of bytes that you wish to monitor, change value type to array of byte and scan for those bytes
5. Scan result will appear in the left pane, you might found multiple result, there's only one correct address most of the time and the rest is accidentally match with the value you scan for, right click and select Browse this memory region, make sure that surrounding data match with what you expect
6. Back to main window, double click the correct ones and it will appear on the bottom pane, right click it and select "DBVM Find out what writes or access this address", a dialog will appear (or your system might crash), the most important part is ensure that the physical address there instead appearing at textbox
7. Select access type, you could watch only writes or both read and writes and hit "Start watch" button
8. Every time any process make an attempt to access or write into that memory region, new instruction will appear in the list.

In my opinion, this topic is close to reverse engineering. Since you're open to suggestion, here's my other two cents: if you had a plan to re-create the existing program which emit the data via shared memory and you're developing the client too, why not remake both of them from scratch so you don't have to deal with this?

It seems to be declared in JitsiMeet+Private.h - this looks like a Objective-C pattern where you would like to have something like 'protected' methods, and you do that by making a header file which exposes methods to friendly classes.