dgschwend.github.io | github pages main entry point : https : //dgschwend.github.io | REST library
kandi X-RAY | dgschwend.github.io Summary
kandi X-RAY | dgschwend.github.io Summary
github pages main entry point:
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of dgschwend.github.io
dgschwend.github.io Key Features
dgschwend.github.io Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on dgschwend.github.io
QUESTION
Lately I've been benchmarking some CNNs regarding time, # of multiply-add operations (MAC), # of parameters and model size. I have seen some similar SO questions (here and here) and in the latter, they suggest using Netscope CNN Analyzer. This tool allows me to calculate most of the things I need just by inputing my Caffe network definition.
However, the number of multiply-add operations of some architectures I've seen in papers and over the internet doesn't match what Netscope is outputting, whereas other architectures match. I'm always comparing either FLOPs or MAC with the MACC column in netscope, but there a ~10x factor that I'm forgetting at some point (check table bellow for more detail).
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-13 at 13:22I've found what was causing the discrepancy between Netscope and the information I'd found in papers. Most preset architectures in Nestcope were using a batch size of 10 (this is the case for VGG and GoogLeNet, for example), therefore the x10 factor that multiplied the number of mult-add operations.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install dgschwend.github.io
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page