delivery | GRPC GUI client for GRPCurl

I am using a managed RabbitMQ cluster through AWS Amazon-MQ. If the consumers finish their work quickly then everything is working fine. However, depending on few scenarios few consumers are taking more than 30 mins to complete the processing. In that scenarios, RabbitMQ deletes the consumer and makes the same messages visible again in the queue. Becasue of this another consumer picks it up and starts processing. It is happing in the loop. Therefore the same transaction is getting executed again and I am loosing the consumer as well. I am not using any AcknowledgeMode so I believe it's AUTO by default and it has 30 mins limit. Is there any way to increase the Delivery Acknowledgement Timeout for AUTO mode? Or please let me know if anyone has any other solutions for this.

I have added validator in TextField but validator is not working while submitting data. Save button saves the data with null value.

I just switched from ForkPool to gevent with concurrency (5) as the pool method for Celery workers running in Kubernetes pods. After the switch I've been getting a non recoverable erro in the worker:

amqp.exceptions.PreconditionFailed: (0, 0): (406) PRECONDITION_FAILED - delivery acknowledgement on channel 1 timed out. Timeout value used: 1800000 ms. This timeout value can be configured, see consumers doc guide to learn more

The broker logs gives basically the same message:

2021-11-01 22:26:17.251 [warning] <0.18574.1> Consumer None4 on channel 1 has timed out waiting for delivery acknowledgement. Timeout used: 1800000 ms. This timeout value can be configured, see consumers doc guide to learn more

I have the CELERY_ACK_LATE set up, but was not familiar with the necessity to set a timeout for the acknowledgement period. And that never happened before using processes. Tasks can be fairly long (60-120 seconds sometimes), but I can't find a specific setting to allow that.

I've read in another post in other forum a user who set the timeout on the broker configuration to a huge number (like 24 hours), and was also having the same problem, so that makes me think there may be something else related to the issue.

Any ideas or suggestions on how to make worker more resilient?

I have a problem using the storage to persist the user login data .

the scenario like that : after login , I clear the app and try to reopen it again , sometimes it open and sometimes it's freezes on the splash screen. this only happen in the release mode .

I tried to remove every package until I found the problem with using the storage after login. so I if I not login nothing freezes .

I used get_storage and shared_preferences and secured_storage packages but nothing changed . flutter 2.10.2.

tested on real device

also this the the used packages

I'm creating a custom dynamic form using Material UI https://mui.com/ library as the component for my React Js app.

Here is the initial state of the dynamic form component.

As we can see that the dynamic form component starts only with one delivery point form. We could add another delivery point form by clicking the "Add Delivery" button. Here is the example after clicking the "Add Delivery" button.

The problem is: the first form and the second form have the same values (if there are more than 1 form) after we gave input to one of the first or second forms as seen in the screenshot below. This is not the condition I want.

But the rest (third, fourth, and so on) forms are unique as seen in the screenshot below. This is the condition I want.

Here is the simple working code:

DeliveryPoint.jsx

I'm trying to validate huge amount of data using Laravel LazyCollection, I test the code with 15 thousands rows each contains 9 columns to be validated.

The scenario is user upload the excel file, then convert it to array, after that the validation of data begins

The Controller :

I am trying to make a simple food delivery system by using data structures. I hold the Neighborhood names in an ArrayList and I hold the Delivery Count, Food Name and it's count in GenericList. I drew the schematic and attached the photo.

I coded the program which prints the "Hood Name and it's delivery count" my code and my outputs are here:

So, I am trying to create a tick box that has this action:

1. The chkAll box , once been ticked, all other check boxes will also ticked.
2. When this action happens, a button will appear.

Then, another action I am trying to achieve is, if two or more checkboxes (not included the chkAll box is ticked, the same button will appear too. This button is like a zip file button, so, only if more than one check box is ticked, it will appear (enabled to be used).

Currently the error I am facing is, 1.the chkAll check box needs to double click only then, the button appear.

2.And when I unclicked the chkAll check box, the button does disappear, but the other chckboxes are still ticked, which they suppose to be unticked too.

3.And when more than 1 check boxes are ticked, the button does not appear.

I am new to php, jquery, so will really appreciate any guidance from you. Thank you.

We are having difficulties choosing a load balancing solution (Load Balancer, Application Gateway, Traffic Manager, Front Door) for IIS websites on Azure VMs. The simple use case when there are 2 identical sites is covered well – just use Azure Load Balancer or Application Gateway. However, in cases when we would like to update websites and test those updates, we encounter limitation of load balancing solutions.

For example, if we would like to update IIS websites on VM1 and test those updates, the strategy would be:

• Point a load balancer to VM2.
• Update IIS website on VM1
• Test the changes
• If all tests are passed then point the load balancer to VM1 only, while we update VM2.
• Point the load balancer to both VMs

We would like to know what is the best solution for directing traffic to only one VM. So far, we only see one option – removing a VM from backend address pool then returning it back and repeating the process for other VMs. Surely, there must be a better way to direct 100% of traffic to only one (or to specific VMs), right?

Update:

We ended up blocking the connection between VMs and Load Balancer by creating Network Security Group rule with Deny action on Service Tag Load Balancer. Once we want that particular VM to be accessible again we switch the NSG rule from Deny to Allow.

The downside of this approach is that it takes 1-3 minutes for the changes to take an effect. Continuous Delivery with Azure Load Balancer

If anybody can think of a faster (or instantaneous) solution for this, please let me know.