mapstruct.org | Web site of the MapStruct project
kandi X-RAY | mapstruct.org Summary
kandi X-RAY | mapstruct.org Summary
Web site of the MapStruct project
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of mapstruct.org
mapstruct.org Key Features
mapstruct.org Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on mapstruct.org
QUESTION
MapStruct generates code at compile-time and it should not require any runtime dependencies:
How is MapStruct different from other bean mapping tools?
Unlike most other bean mapping tools, MapStruct doesn’t work at runtime but is a compile-time code generator.
Generating mapping code at build time has many advantages:
- Excellent performance, as no reflection or byte code generation at runtime is needed; the generated code contains plain method invocations, just as if the mapper was hand-written
- No runtime dependencies, making MapStruct a great solution for Android applications
Which dependency scope should be used in a Maven project? Should MapStruct be included as a provided dependency?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-12 at 08:23The org.mapstruct:mapstruct
dependency contains the needed annotations to signal the org.mapstruct:mapstruct-processor
what to do.
It also contains the Mappers
factory that is used when using the default component model. Therefore, the scope of org.mapstruct:mapstruct
depends on the component model that you are using:
If you are using this component model then you need org.mapstruct:mapstruct
during runtime if you are using Mappers
or if you have dependencies between different mappers.
In theory you can use the default component model and instantiate your own mappers. However, dependencies between mappers are still going to use Mappers
, unless you have instantiated your mapper in MyMapper.INSTANCE
somehow already, then MapStruct will use MyMapper.INSTANCE
to get the instance of the MyMapper
. This would mean that you can still use the same scope as the other component models (see below for more information)
In this case you do not need org.mapstruct:mapstruct
during runtime and you can use true
with provided
.
With Gradle this would be compileOnly
dependency.
Note: Be careful when using Spring Boot and provided
the Spring Boot maven plugin will still include the org.mapstruct:mapstruct
dependency in the final provided jar. You'll need to ignore it by configuring the Spring Boot Maven plugin.
QUESTION
How can I use MapStruct to create a mapper that maps from Model entity that includes one list of objects and one another object to Domain entity, consists of only list of nested objects.
My Model entity list object = SourceObject-A;
My Model entity second object = SourceObject-B;
My Doamin entity list object = TargetObject-AB;
My source classes looks like this:
SourceObject-A:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-09 at 07:51You could do something like this in your mapper:
QUESTION
I have Inventory
class and InventoryResponse
class.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-02 at 06:36In order to reuse configuration like this you need to use MapperConfig
.
So in your use case you can do something like:
QUESTION
I am learning to use MapStruct.
I have the following custom mapping configuration that maps a List
comes from JPA entity to DTO String
that way:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 13:58Keep in mind that MapStruct is an annotation processor, and the expression written in expression
will be written one to one in the generated Java class. Therefore, doing a refactoring will lead to a compile error.
Having said that there is an alternative solution for this.
QUESTION
I'm currently setting up a MapStruct mapper with the Spring componentModel and so far everything works fine, the individual sub-mappers can be autowired and are injected as expected. However, using decorated mappers leads to the following failure when loading the ApplicationContext:
Error creating bean with name 'exampleMapperImpl': Unsatisfied dependency expressed through constructor parameter 0; nested exception is org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No qualifying bean of type '...ExampleMapper' available: expected at least 1 bean which qualifies as autowire candidate. Dependency annotations: {@org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Qualifier(value="delegate")}
I exactly followed the MapStruct documentation to decorate my mapper, which is why I'm confused as to why the setup is not working.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 10:06I finally managed to solve the problem. For decorated mappers, additionally to ExampleMapperImpl
, an additional class ExampleMapperImpl_
is generated which has to be included in the SpringBootTest annotation as well.
QUESTION
Here is my sample setup:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 05:38Figured out, as well raised a bug with the MapStruct team on GitHub.
To get it working, the following must meet:
- mapper method must be
static
qualifiedByName
attribute is certainly required, even if I change the generic signature to be& EnumMessage>
So my modified code looks like this:
QUESTION
I have a Java class having 10 attributes, I want to convert this into 3 maps(Breaking it into 5,3,2 fields resepectively). I did some research and found that Jackson's ObjectMapper can be used by doing something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-04 at 07:26You can create methods to get required maps.
QUESTION
How to resolve the following warning from the quarkus maven plugin?
Found unrecommended usage of private members (use package-private instead) in application beans
My code looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-09 at 22:11Switching to constructor injection strategy will resolve the warning. It’s also recommended by MapStruct:
QUESTION
I have following structures
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-05 at 12:31If you want to use expressions then you have to use Mapping#expression
. Whatever you define in the expression it will be set one to one in the generated code.
e.g.
QUESTION
I've got project, where I often map dto -> db model. Almost all my db models have some additional fields, like version, which are never mapped from dto.
Is there any possibility or elegant workaround to ignore target fields globally only by theirs names?
For now I have to use @Mapping(target = "version", ignore = true)
. Cannot use @Mapper(unmappedTargetPolicy = ReportingPolicy.IGNORE)
, because I'd like to get warns or errors when I accidentally omit any important property. I control default behavior with '-Amapstruct.unmappedTargetPolicy=WARN'
, which I change for ERROR during developing new functions.
Some people may say that these are just warnings, but when there are many of them, it makes it harder to spot mistakes.
Mapstruct 1.3.1.Final, probably will move to 1.4.1.Final in nearest future. Searched through the docs, but couldn't find anything useful.
Thanks in advance for your answers :)
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-19 at 15:12Some people may say that these are just warnings, but when there are many of them, it makes it harder to spot mistakes.
First of all, I am glad you don't ignore warnings.
As of MapStruct 1.4 you can create an annotation that is composed of multiple mappings. Read more at the documentation of MapStruct 1.4.1. 3.2. Mapping Composition (experimental). This configuration can also be shared (11.3. Shared configurations).
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install mapstruct.org
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page