hal_specification | HAL Specification

 by   mikekelly CSS Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | hal_specification Summary

kandi X-RAY | hal_specification Summary

hal_specification is a CSS library. hal_specification has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

HAL Specification
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              hal_specification has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 608 star(s) with 63 fork(s). There are 59 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 17 open issues and 8 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 75 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of hal_specification is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              hal_specification has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              hal_specification has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              hal_specification does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              hal_specification releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of hal_specification
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            hal_specification Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for hal_specification.

            hal_specification Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for hal_specification.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            TypeScript type that forces exactly one of the given types
            Asked 2021-Apr-05 at 17:49

            Before this is marked as a duplicate, it is not, at least not of any of the first 10+ search results. This situation adds a level of complexity that I can't quite figure out.

            tl;dr What works for exclusively specifying exactly one property of n must exist, or that a property must exist in exactly one of n spots, does not work when used on a nested property. TS Playground

            I'm doing some Saturday overengineering--like ya do. My project uses JSON HAL documents (HAL documents basically describe an entity of some sort and with a _links property, define the available behavior), however, the backend (which I did not write) does not always send the documents in the same shape. I have a normalizeRepresentation() function that takes in what the server sends me and morphs it into what it should look like.

            To produce minimal code, I've removed stuff regarding _links.

            Differences between standard HAL:

            • the entity data is on exactly one of:
              • the root document itself
              • the document property
              • the data property
              • the item property
              • the item.data property
            • there is an optional contentType property that is either placed on the root document or inside the entity data, but not both

            normalizeRepresentation() initially had the signature:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-04 at 01:16

            I think I've done it, by basically expanding all of the helper types out into one big union. This helped me see what was supposed to be happening, and also made it work better in the end. I found it important to add x?: never in many places, so that TS can properly prevent you from mixing together different variants of the data structure.

            The errors don't always occur on the same lines as your original code, but I'm not sure much can be done about that.

            I think this also still has some limitations, for example, it probably won't work if T legitimately has a data or contentType key.

            At some level of complexity, though, I would question the value of having these very strict TS types, which work best with object literals (where the compiler actually gives an error if you add unknown keys), when you said the data is coming from a server anyway, which implies that mostly only your test code will ever be working with object literals. If you're able to leverage these types on the server where the objects are being generated, though, that could be beneficial.

            TS Playground

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66936722

            QUESTION

            What are differences in many to many mapping approach
            Asked 2019-Nov-05 at 13:19

            I want many to many relation mapping with explicit join table.

            My java spring project is providing REST api in HAL format and now it has only two types of classed:

            • entities defined and
            • "empty" interfaces for repositories (annotated by @RepositoryRestResource).

            Sidenote, dependencies are circa these:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Nov-05 at 13:19

            To make many2many association work nicely with spring data rest things and provide HAL representation with correct things, you have first know a bit of JPA/Hibernate. There are two approaches (1 and 2 from question, as third is only shortcut for second one and working in Hibernate only.).

            Both approaches are shown in proof of concept repository in tags branch. I use given repository to test various set-ups of project.

            Approach 1, EmbeddedId. It does use hackish thing in FixConfig class in BackendIdConverter bean, where it uses bookRepository to get Book entity when it parses request id from url onto embedable id class.

            Approach 2, IdClass. It is using plain Integers int its IdClass and does seem to be correct solution.

            I think that first approach can be modified to work similarly as second, but I am not able to do it for now.

            I would mark as solution any answer providing some insight for "why" it is like this.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56934294

            QUESTION

            Consuming HATEOAS API from native clients, Is REST really REST?
            Asked 2019-Nov-02 at 21:57

            I'm writing Web API in ASP NET Core and I want to consume it from single page applications (e.g. using Angular, Vue, React), native desktop applications and mobile applications.

            I stumbled across concept called "HATEOAS" and I learnt that the API I'm building isn't really RESTful and I wrongly named it RESTful (https://devblast.com/b/calling-your-web-api-restful-youre-doing-it-wrong).

            And it seems like most of the people use this term badly (Roy T. Fielding - man behind REST idea about his annoyance: http://roy.gbiv.com/untangled/2008/rest-apis-must-be-hypertext-driven)

            From what I learnt the idea behind HATEOAS is thinking of your application as you think of websites, that means it exposes links to resources (like in HTML) so you don't have to hardcode the links/endpoints in your client code and your client code won't break if you change some endpoint (?).

            Another thing is that it makes your API discoverable without any documentation, i.e. API describes itself (like meta API)

            When I look at the existing "REST" clients for C# for example:

            They have "REST" in their name but none of them dig into the concept of HATEOAS. So why the heck are they named "Rest clients"?

            How HATEOAS is supposed to be used on the client-side? To my surprise there isn't much about it on the internet, there's a lot about how to implement HATEOAS on the server, but there isn't much how it's supposed to work on the client. That most often should provide navigation logic.

            Besides of that all, there are many API client generators (parsing OpenAPI specification) like AutoRest (nothing about hyperlinks and HATEOAS, to my surprise), or NSwag

            I was googling for few hours to learn about HATEOAS, but most often people talk about it without describing how to use it (there are almost none client libraries supporting it).

            There are many standards for it like HAL, Ion etc. But there are almost none rest client libraries implementing those standards. There's also json:api. All these standards are very similar.

            So my question is:

            • Is HATEOAS applicable for applications like SPAs, mobile and desktop clients?

            • What's the real use case for HATEOAS, if I can as well hardcode my endpoints, or generate new API client from OpenAPI (Swagger) specification as it changes?

            • Is it even worth to bother with it?

            There are almost none practical examples of interacting with HATEOAS or Hypermedia APIs, or am I missing something here and they're not supposed to be used by my client code?

            To me it seems like implementing it on both client and the server is a lot of boilerplate code, so why aren't there many libraries supporting it out of the box (using one of the standard). It seems like json:api has many implementations http://jsonapi.org/implementations/#client-libraries-net

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Apr-19 at 14:11

            REST is a paradigm that applies more broadly than just the HTTP protocol and so-called "web APIs". A RESTful Web API, is one that simply applies principles from the REST paradigm to client-server communication over HTTP. As such, it doesn't necessary follow everything in REST and doesn't necessarily need to.

            While HATEOAS is a nice concept, there's no HTTP client that actually implements it out of the box (at least that I'm aware of). You can feel free to make your API implement it, but that doesn't mean it will actually be used, and while your API may be "RESTful", it doesn't mean every client will be. Part of the foundation of the HTTP protocol is adaptive communication. In other words, a client need not support all the features of a server and vice versa. The client and server, instead, work with what they share in common in terms of functionality.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49916779

            QUESTION

            Deserialize hal+json to complex model
            Asked 2019-Jan-15 at 09:40

            I have the following HAL+JSON sample:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Jan-14 at 14:08

            The company object will be under Embedded _embedded object.

            like

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54129403

            QUESTION

            How do you add multiple links of the same type to a resource using Spring HATEOAS?
            Asked 2019-Jan-06 at 03:51

            The HAL spec that I am working with says that you can have multiple links of the same type on a resource like this:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Jan-06 at 03:51

            If you call ResourceSupport::add() twice (or more) with the same withRel value, it creates an array ref with that name containing each of the items.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54058356

            QUESTION

            Deserialize Root Object in ServiceStack Explicit Response DTO
            Asked 2018-Feb-21 at 11:14

            I'm consuming a third party WebApi using ServiceStack. Imagine this API has the following route.

            https://api.example.com/v1/people/{id} returns the person with the specified ID.

            JSON:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Feb-20 at 08:03

            The purpose of DTOs (Data Transfer Objects) is to define the Service Contract with a Typed Schema that matches the shape of the Wire Format so they can be used with a generic serializer to automatically Serialize/Deserialize payloads without manual custom logic boilerplate.

            So I'm not following why you're trying to hide the public schema of the DTO and why the Types contain embedded logic, both of which are anti-patterns for DTOs which should be benign impl-free data structures.

            My first recommendation is to change your Types so they are DTOs where their public schema matches the shape of the data it's trying to deserialize into.

            Failing that, given your Types aren't DTOs and you want to use it to hydrate a data model I'd look at creating a separate Typed DTO and use an AutoMapping library (or a custom Type mapper extension method) to copy the data from the Typed DTO into your ideal Data Model.

            If you don't want to maintain a separate Typed Data DTO from your Data Model you can use a generic JSON parser which will deserialize arbitrary data structures into a loose-typed generic .NET Data Structures like Dictionary.

            If you're just looking to avoid public properties and are happy to have public fields instead you can specify ServiceStack.Text's serializer to populate public fields with:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48880042

            QUESTION

            How do I export data in accordance to HAL spec?
            Asked 2018-Jan-22 at 09:46

            According to this specification, applications exposing data in hal+json format should provide embedded links in the _links json field. However, if I declare my REST Repository in spring-data 1.5.9 like this:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Jan-22 at 04:37

            I don't believe Spring HATEOAS does HAL out of the box. You can enabled it by adding the following to your configuration:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48374404

            QUESTION

            HAL - is it a violation to the HAL format/standard if links are in the main body?
            Asked 2017-Jun-26 at 21:53

            According to the HAL standard (see here and here) the links to other resources should be placed in a specific embedded section.

            So for instance this is not valid HAL, is my understanding correct?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Jun-23 at 07:55

            As observable in the specs you posted, you can have links and/or embedded resources:

            A resource's links should sit as a property of that resource:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44703189

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install hal_specification

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            If you think some part of the spec needs changing, just fork this repo and raise a pull request with your changes.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/mikekelly/hal_specification.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone mikekelly/hal_specification

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:mikekelly/hal_specification.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link