tagtest | use Go 's build constraints | Transpiler library

Is this expected behavior?

Yes, it is.

And, is there a way to tag a role (as well as a task - include_role) in a playbook to only filter whether that role itself is executed or not based on that tag passed in at execution?

Since Ansible version 2.4 there are three ways of using roles:

• roles declaration at play level,
• import_role module, and
• include_role module.

With import_role and roles declaration, Ansible concatenates the tags specified in the declaration and executes the tasks.

include_role works like a stand-alone task, i.e. it itself observes the tags.

^Notes

^{- The same rule applies to when conditions.}

^{- Before Ansible 2.4 include_role worked like import_role now.}

^{- Reference Differences Between Static and Dynamic}

If I'm understanding your question correctly, you want to be able to pass any T value to the function (based on the example function call that you showed). To do this, you need to add an additional parameter:

You need to call the CreateIndependentTag method from the Execute method. The Execute method is what is actually called by Revit, and currently yours is only throwing an exception.

Additionally, the CreateIndependentTag method expects a wall, as well as the document as parameters. The document can be obtained from ExternalCommandData.
The wall can either be obtained by prompting the user to select a wall, or by taking a pre-selected wall. In this case, we will prompt the user to select the wall and validate the selection afterwards.

Finally, you need to wrap the call to CreateIndependentTag in a Transaction, as you are making changes to the document.

Putting it all together looks like this:

Remove

This is not MySQL way to achieve what you wanted. I have a JS way to achieve what you need.

To my eyes, this looks like a very akward way of doing bitpacking.

What Field_1() does is provide a way to access all values of the various fields (which have been carefully crafted to fit in 64 bits, hence the comments) packed into a single int64_t.

The code abuses the fact that the memory layout of the packed fields allows it to just reinterpret the data stored at that location in memory instead of having to manually create the value by combining the various fields.

It's actually functionally equivalent to this (if I'm reading it right):

This query is possible if the first returns a scalar value (that is a single row). So, what you want to do is not possible using just IN. One Postres'y way to handle this uses arrays

You can simply check with exists: