nic | Nic is a HTTP request client | REST library
kandi X-RAY | nic Summary
kandi X-RAY | nic Summary
Nic is a HTTP request client which has elegant, easy-to-use API.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- setFiles adds a file to the request .
- setQuery appends the query params to the request .
- set data to request
- NewResponse returns a new Response .
- setJSON encodes JV into req .
- SetEncode sets the encoding
- NewSession returns a new session
- FileFromPath creates a new F from the given path .
- File returns a pointer to a File object
- Head performs a HEAD request .
nic Key Features
nic Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on nic
QUESTION
I have a terraform tfvars.json file as like below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-01 at 07:16Your lb_rule_specs
is a list(map(string))
but you are just passing a map(string)
.
Assuming that everything else works, to address your error it should be:
QUESTION
Good day for everybody. I would need to create a powershell script that will send xml with post request as multipart/form-data and receives it back. On the official site (only available in Czech) there is only this little code of html form:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-23 at 02:16Fixed your code by comparing with powershell invoke-restmethod multipart/form-data
QUESTION
I need to create a TCP session "manually", without using the connect()
function. I have tried to use RAW sockets. But in this case, I only get copies of the incoming IP packets. The original incoming packets slip through to the kernel and it generates an ACK response packet that damages my protocol.
Next, variant 2, I can write a virtual eth interface driver (kernel module) and route incoming traffic to it using iptables. But there is a patched non-original (non vanila) kernel on the machine. Normal linking of the module with the kernel is not possible.
Variant 3. I also tried not to assign an IP address to the NIC interface. In this case, the network TCP/IP layer module in the kernel is not activated and it is possible to generate and receive arbitrary IP packets on the link (ethernet) layer using the PF_PACKET
socket domain type in the socket() function. But at this time, any other applications using the TCP/IP protocol can’t work.
How can this problem be solved in other ways?
It would be nice if it were possible to intercept packets going from the network interface to the kernel, that is, intercept the SKBuf
buffer. But I don't know how to realize it.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-21 at 10:37Apparently you are trying to create a tunnel. Instead of trying to hijack an existing interface, the proper way to create a tunnel is to create a new interface, using a kernel module or TUN/TAP. However, tunnels are normally intended to receive traffic generated on the machine which runs the tunnel software, or at least routed through it. That means you will also have to set up the kernel to route the traffic to your tunnel.
You can create a new interface as a TUN/TAP interface. It is like a virtual ethernet driver except you don't need to write a new kernel module. It is designed for tunnels (hence the name).
The difference between TUN and TAP is that a TUN interface is an IP interface that receives IP packets from the kernel's IP routing system, and a TAP interface receives Ethernet packets (which may contain IP packets) so it can alternatively be part of a bridge (a virtual Ethernet switch - which only looks at the Ethernet header, not the IP header).
I think for your scenario, you will find it easiest to create a TAP interface, then create a bridge (virtual Ethernet switch) between the TAP interface, and the interface which the other host is connected to. Neither one needs an IP address - the kernel will happily pass Ethernet-layer traffic without attempting to process the IP information in the packet. Your tunnel software can then emulate a host - or tunnel to an actual host - or whatever you want it to do.
If you want the host to also be able to talk to the machine running the tunnel software - without going through the tunnel software - then you may choose to put an IP address on the bridge.
QUESTION
I am working on a p2p application and to make testing simple, I am currently using udp broadcast for the peer discovery in my local network. Each peer binds one udp socket to port 29292 of the ip address of each local network interface (discovered via GetAdaptersInfo
) and each socket periodically sends a packet to the broadcast address of its network interface/local address. The sockets are set to allow port reuse (via setsockopt
SO_REUSEADDR
), which enables me to run multiple peers on the same local machine without any conflicts. In this case there is only a single peer on the entire network though.
This all works perfectly fine (tested with 2 peers on 1 machine and 2 peers on 2 machines) UNTIL a network interface is disconnected. When deactivacting the network adapter of either my wifi or an USB-to-LAN adapter in the windows dialog, or just plugging the usb cable of the adapter, the next call to sendto
will fail with return code 10049
. It doesn't matter if the other adapter is still connected, or was at the beginning, it will fail. The only thing that doesn't make it fail is deactivating wifi through the fancy win10 dialog through the taskbar, but that isn't really a surprise because that doesn't deactivate or remove the adapter itself.
I initially thought that this makes sense because when the nic is gone, how should the system route the packet. But: The fact that the packet can't reach its target has absolutely nothing to do with the address itsself being invalid (which is what the error means), so I suspect I am missing something here. I was looking for any information I could use to detect this case and distinguish it from simply trying to sendto
INADDR_ANY
, but I couldn't find anything. I started to log every bit of information which I suspected could have changed, but its all the same on a successfull sendto
and the one that crashes (retrieved via getsockopt
):
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-01 at 16:01This is a issue people have been facing up for a while , and people suggested to read the documentation provided by Microsoft on the following issue . "Btw , I don't know whether they are the same issues or not but the error thrown back the code are same, that's why I have attached a link for the same!!"
QUESTION
I compiled qemu-system-x86_64
on aarch64 host, and was able to run a x86_64 guest with a command like
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-24 at 04:17The problem was actually about firewall. My VM (based on Oracle Linux 8.5 on Oracle Linux VM Templates) actually had firewall rules in both iptables
and nft
. After disabling both iptables
and nft
, the port forward worked.
QUESTION
I'm trying to simply deploy a Azure Storage account with a Private Endpoint using an ARM Template using Complete Deployment.
Template is below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 16:55To achieve the above requirement First you have to register the feature AllowPrivateEndpointCustomNicName
,Once you register this you can create nic in the ARM TEMPLETE and attach it to the private endpoint customNetworkInterfaceName
. To show the feature is registered or not you can use the below cmd
QUESTION
I'm trying to set the "network_interface_ids" within "azurerm_virtual_machine" to the output of one of my modules, but am receiving the following error during the "terraform plan" and can't figure out where I'm going wrong:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-18 at 11:22Your var.nicid
is already a list. So it should be:
QUESTION
I'm pretty new to terraform and I'm trying to learn and write a TF code to automate Azure VM deployment. I'm trying to cover each parts as modules (except rg) rather than keeping it in a single main.tf file.
I'm creating a single Vnet with 3 subnets inside. Please find my code for the subnet module. Please help me with below two points.
Subnet.tf
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-14 at 22:32- Since your
azurerm_subnet.SUBNETS
is a map due to the use offor_each
:
QUESTION
When I try to attach a BPF program in XDP offload mode, I get Invalid argument
. I get the same error if attach through code or by using bpftool
. Here's how I'm attaching using netlink:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-10 at 21:09Mellanox cards support some hardware offload (e.g., flow control rules), but not the offload of BPF programs as far as I know. The only Ethernet adapters out there that support BPF offloading are Netronome's cards.
One way to check this is to grep for the XDP_SETUP_PROG_HW
BPF netdev command in the Linux source code:
QUESTION
Hey Brilliant Stack overflow community,
I encountered an interesting scenarios regarding dealing with alert like pop up user authentication box.
1: website used (a practice website): https://the-internet.herokuapp.com/
2: When I clicked in to Basic Auth, there was a alert like pop up window show up (see below).
3: What I tried so far.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-02 at 20:13The alert box is not an HTML element. It's not part of the webpage, thus you could not see it in the HTML code. The alert box is part of the browser.
Some contextWhat you are seeing is an example of the Basic access authentication. As the wiki stated, what usually would happen is that your app/browser automatically provides the username and password via a header field (the Authorization
header) in the request. In this case, your browser does not know the username and password yet so it asks for it via the browser's alert box.
I believe the cleanest and easiest way to authenticate using selenium would be providing the credential during your get method like so:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install nic
Do a HTTP request like this.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page