cass | Cassandra client for Go

After i kept digging, i found the solution. the Or() statement needs to be in brackets.

I was able to fix this by increasing the memory to 12Gi

In your form:

Assume your case with ID set to "3"

Try below

To do this you need to create a migration file that copies the data from the old through table to the new one.

First create an empty migration file that will be populated with our migration operations

One of the easiest ways to create a shift-reduce conflict is to introduce a new non-terminal representing an optional instance:

Your code tries to get "registration_date" on that UserProfile instance and it gets that UserProfile instance using "request.user", i.e. the logged in user. If the user isn't logged in, that will return an empty QuerySet and if you take the first element, it'll return None.

You can't call "registration_date" on None.

Maybe check if you are logged in? Or if it's a profile linked to a user check out how to extend the user model:

https://simpleisbetterthancomplex.com/tutorial/2016/07/22/how-to-extend-django-user-model.html

Unfortunately, according to the Codex entry for WP_User_Query()` , under the return values sections is following:

If ‘fields‘ is set to ‘all’ (default), or ‘all_with_meta’, it will return an array of WP_User objects (does not include related user meta fields even with ‘all_with_meta’ set).

There's also a note in the Parameters section above:

*’all_with_meta’ currently returns the same fields as ‘all’ which does not include user fields stored in wp_usermeta. You must create a second query to get the user meta fields by ID or use the __get PHP magic method to get the values of these fields.

What that means, is that currently (as of this Q/A, with WordPress 5.8.1) you'll need to grab the user meta separately, either with the get_user_meta() function or the magic methods. For instance:

Assuming that these host are physically connected to 1 switch, the obvious answer would be a->b possible, b->a not possible.

The picture is however a bit more complicated. If you test this with wireshark, the problem becomes immediately visible.

Host a A will initiate the communication. It will send-out an ARP packet "who has 192.168.1.1? Tell 192.168.0.200." So Host B will say: "hey, that's me, eh, I'm not on that network" It depends a bit on the IP stack of host B, but in general will not send an ARP reply to host A. Since host A does not get an answer to its ARP request, it will assume that the host B is unreachable.

B sees that host A is not in its subnet. Therefore, B will send the packets to the gateway, which is not mentioned here.